similar to: using round-robin dns for sip registrations

Hi everybody, I've got a very strange problem: As far as I remember I didn't change anything on my Asterisk side. I have 2 SIP providers to which I can place outbound calls. Today I noticed that outbound calls to provider "inode" fail (and inbound from this provider too). On the CLI I get every 20 seconds following messages: Nov 9 20:01:07 NOTICE[952]: chan_sip.c:5422

Hello, I have a problem with an LAN-Server behind an NAT-router. Asterisk Version 1.2.1 or 1.2.2 doesnt matter 10 minutes after starting Asterisk I loose all registrations at external SIP-proxys. The reason seemed to be that Asterisk send every second an request to every sip-proxy "Request: OPTIONS sip:sip.domain.tld". Every request is responded by the sip-proxy. After some minutes

Hi, Digging on this case : 2009/5/26 Olivier <oza-4h07 at myamail.com> > Hi, > > In my sip.conf, I've got : > [general](+) > ; register=>tcp://trunk4ipbx:password at 192.168.100.129<trunk4ipbx%3Apassword at 192.168.100.129> > register=>trunk4ipbx:password at 192.168.100.129<trunk4ipbx%3Apassword at 192.168.100.129> > > When

Let me set up a Very Dumb Question (VDQ). My apologies in advance for repeating much of this to those who have been of such vast help getting me this far. (Followup to: is set as gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general) I have a testbed machine which currently has /dev/hda1 - 6, according to qtparted, with sizes 102 MB, 14 GB, 13 GB, 13 GB, 12 GB, and 14 MB respectively (rounded to nearest whole MB or

Ok...I can't believe I'm still struggling with this!!! I've setup a SAMBA server using ARCH Linux 0.7 (Wombat) *what a distro!!* and everything is fine except when it comes to adding machines to the domain (aaarrrgghh). When I try to do it via windows, I get "the domain is no longer available". So I add a machine account manually, then go to windows and walla, I get the

Hi, I have a linux server running kernel 2.6.19 that is connected with 2 seperate 100Mbit links to the same isp: +---+ +---------------+ | I | +---------------+ | | | S | | | | eth0 --+--------------+ P | | |

Greetings I have been running * for about a month now. Configuration. (5) Cisco 79xx IP phones (1) XP100P Pentium III (300mhz) 192meg memory Redat 8.0 (updated) It seems to run for about 3-6 hours, then the process stops. I have noticed, that * does not stop, if I do NOT have it register to other sip servers. (FWD and PCH). Here is are the last few lines in the /var/log/asterisk/messages

Hello, I''m new to the list and iproute2 itself. I was searching for a way to simultaneously use several IPs on the *same network interface* for outbound traffic. Let me explain: I have eth0 interface to which I set 2 IP addresses; 192.168.0.1 and 192.168.0.2. Then I want to connect to Internet through 192.168.0.254 gateway using round-robin between those 2 addresses. The iproute2

> > Hi All, > > > > Customer is requesting 1 incoming toll free #, that dial out to 4 > > different terminating numbers, not ring all at once but ring #1, then > > #2, then #3, then #4, then back to #1 consecutively on inbound calls, > > regardless if someone is on #1. So this is not like a hunt group, > > more like an agent queue set with a round-robin

Hi, Using ctdb, is it a valid setup to have : CTDB_PUBLIC_ADDRESSES=/etc/ctdb/public_addresses containing only one ip address, thus with no round-robin. Is there a particular hard-coded limit that doesn't allow this? -- Nicolas Ecarnot

I was wondering if anyone has an easy way to emulate dialing in a round robin fashion like when you use Zap/r1 for Zap trunks. At the moment what I do is simply make a macro that will dial the sip trunks in order so if the first one fails it goes to the second and so on. The problem with this approach is that the first few SIP trunks will always be busy because of outgoing traffic. Is there an

I want to add another server to my existing Samba environment and use DNS round robin to do load balancing. Both will use same smb.conf. Is anyone out there using this kind of setup? I have few quick questions: 1. Can "interfaces" statement be used in DNS round robin. If yes, then how? 2. Should "preferred master= yes" be defined on both boxes? Thanks.

This is posed as a question more that a statement, so if you can show that I'm wrong, please feel free to correct / flame me. A couple of years ago, I identified a file corruption issue caused by two people attempting to edit the same file via two different Samba servers. The file was in a shared file space, mounted on both Samba servers via NFS. The problem, I believe, lies in the fact

> From: Martin Devera <devik@cdi.cz> > Subject: [LARTC] (E)SFQ suggestion > Hi, > just simple note. Maybe it is already in progress :) > > There are attempts to replace hashing routine in SFQ to > consider IPs or ports. > What about to use HRR - roundrobin around bunch of IP > adresses and then smaller WRR for ports per IP ? > It would solve both

Hello everybody, i have two gsm line (extra channels) and i'd like to schedule the outgoing calls with a round-robin strategy. If all the gsm lines are busy, the call must be sent to the pri lines with a linear strategy. here is the dialplan: exten => gsm,ChanIsAvail(EXTRA/r2&DAHDI/g1) same => n,GotoIf($["${AVAILORIGCHAN}" = ""]?unavail,1) same =>

Hi, Anyone knows if there is a way to play a list of sound file in a round robin mode (at specific interval) while someone in waiting in moh in a queue? Ok, you enter a queue and wait listening to moh, every X minutes a sound file is played from a list of sound files to be played. If that possible and if so how? Thanks for any pointers. Andre

Hello All, I've encountered a problem with OpenSSH_3.7.1p2 and krb5 authentication that I did not have using previous OpenSSH versions and krb5. I have a group of machines that are all listed as addresses for hostname.domain.blah via round-robin dns. When attempting to ssh to hostname.here.blah using krb5 auth, I get the following error: (client side) debug1: Authentications that can

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 ------- Additional Comments From dleonard at vintela.com 2005-06-08 22:16 ------- a workaround at http://blog.macnews.de/unspecific/stories/4581/ ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 simon at sxw.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |simon at sxw.org.uk ------- Comment #5 from simon at sxw.org.uk 2006-08-19 08:28 ------- There isn't an easy fix for this, at

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 ------- Comment #7 from jan.iven at cern.ch 2006-10-24 02:17 ------- Created an attachment (id=1202) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=1202&action=view) (simplified patch - no config option) Given that the GSSAPI library will (unconditionally) use DNS anyway, perhaps we don't need yet another client-side config