similar to: Linux Trademarked?

The "2005 Readers' Choice Awards" voting is in progress at Linux Journal, and CentOS is Nominated in the "distribution:" category. So ... all you guys and gals who think CentOS is the best thing ever, get over to: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8266 and vote for CentOS :) ------------------------------- Also, since write ins are allowed on the e-mailed ballot, if

Hi Sean, This is great, but it couples LogicalDylib too tightly to CompileOnDemandLayer. Does this alternative implementation of getLogicalModuleResourcesForSymbol work for you (unfortunately I don't have a local test case for this yet): LogicalModuleResources* getLogicalModuleResourcesForSymbol(const std::string &Name, bool

I needed to be able to update stub pointers for hot functions that get recompiled in a lazy JIT that uses CompileOnDemandLayer. In order to do this I added a method that allows pointers to be updated but does not expose any of the other internals of the COD layer. Does anyone have a cleaner way to do this? Has something to facilitate this already been added? Would it be possible to merge this

+Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com>, Master Regent of the Three <No, Two sir> JITs On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:31 PM Sean Ogden via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I needed to be able to update stub pointers for hot functions that get > recompiled in a lazy JIT that uses CompileOnDemandLayer. In order to do > this I added a method that allows pointers to

It does work. I just tested it on my JIT. Thanks! As for the part that couples them too tightly, would you recommend I just keep my own specialized version of CompileOnDemandLayer.h that includes this functionality, or do you have any ideas for a cleaner way to do this? I've noticed a couple of people asking for support for updating stub pointers for functions that are optimized at runtime,

Hi Sean, As for the part that couples them too tightly, would you recommend I just > keep my own specialized version of CompileOnDemandLayer.h that includes > this functionality, or do you have any ideas for a cleaner way to do this? My apologies - I wasn't very clear in my description of the issue. The only sense in which your original patch was tightly coupled was that it had

Interesting story at Groklaw...just thought I would share: http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20120913073511444 -- _ ?v? /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre Registerd Linux user No #267004 www.counter.li.org ****

Friends, Sorry to write this to a developer mailing list. I have already approached some OpenSSH/OpenBSD core members on this, including Markus Friedl, Theo de Raadt, and Niels Provos, but they have chosen not to bring the issue up on the mailing list. I am not aware of any other forum where I would reach the OpenSSH developers, so I will post this here. As you know, I have been using the SSH

Hi folks XenSource published a trademark policy[1]. I don't think we will be able to follow it if we want to support installation of different versions at the same time. Bastian [1]: http://www.xensource.com/company/legal.html -- There are some things worth dying for. -- Kirk, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3201.7 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was

All, I am trying to configure hdlc support on T100P Digium card - everything seems ok... but it just does not work at all. I was able to compile all drivers, the light on the card becomes green when I plug T1 link.... but I even can't ping default router IP... there is no data coming back to me, so I am confused completely now. Also I tried both protocols - raw hdlc and cisco hdlc. The

Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0-unstable-1-amd64 Version: 3.0-unstable+hg11561-1 Severity: serious It seems Xen has a similar trademark policy as the much discussed Mozilla one. Specifically http://www.xensource.com/xen-tm-faq.html says: | 16. If I distribute a changed version of the Xen? hypervisor, may I | say that the changed product is the Xen hypervisor? | | No. If you have changed an

http://blogs.computerworld.com/15082/omg_microsoft_patents_sudo_linux_and_macos_dead?source=CTWNLE_nlt_dailyam_2009-11-12 -- thanks ./francis -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20091112/1061174b/attachment-0003.html>

I'd like to address several issues raised by people in relation to my notice of the ssh(R) trademark to the OpenSSH group. Also, I would like to make a proposal to the community for resolving this issue (included at the end). First, I'll answer a number of questions and arguments presented in the discussion. > "the SSH Corp trademark registration in the US is for a logo

I'm not looking to start a discussion of the GPL on R-devel; I'm just giving a reference because the subject of the GPL, the license under which R is issued, has been brought up on this list. If you want to follow some of the legal discussion of the Free Software Foundation's General Public License (GPL), the web site groklaw.net is required reading. One reason is because Pamela

A new version of httpd is available for CentOS-3 i386 This fixes a missed trademark issue in previous build. https://bugzilla.caosity.org/show_bug.cgi?id=710 refers. Updated files are :- updates/i386/RPMS/httpd-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/httpd-devel-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/httpd-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2.src.rpm yum update httpd will be

I found an old ROM BIOS chip in my drawer with label Centos(r) Copyright 1994 on it. Then I found http://www.centos.com.tw/ on the net. Has anyone checked if you can use the name centos without any fear of litigation? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070101/3918e0cc/attachment-0001.html>

I would also like to mention that when I released TTSSH in May 1998, I had no concerns about violating any trademarks because I observed that the name "SSH" was already being used by several different parties for different purposes --- as the name of Ylonen's original SSH package and its derivatives, as the name of the protocol, and as a component of names of other implementations

Dear list, There is, I believe, a minor typo in the example section of influence.measures.Rd. In the final example the word `does` appears where I suspect `dose` is required: I couldn't remember exactly what format patches should be in, so here is one as diff would produce: Index: devel/src/library/stats/man/influence.measures.Rd

If you upgrade to sco 5.0.7, you get samba 3.0.20 5.0.6 had samba 3.0.14. so im wondering why your using samba 2.2.. samba 3.0x. is on the supplimental discs. Gr. Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: dave at anchor-tech.co.uk >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens David Nolan >Verzonden: vrijdag 22 mei 2015 14:12 >Aan: 'Mauricio Tavares' >CC:

Colleagues, What is the easiest means to embed a: ? (registered) or ? (trademark) sign in text in a graphic. I would like to use mtext and avoid plotmath, if possible. Ideally, the sign should be superscripted but I can easily sacrifice that. Optimally, I need a solution that works in both OS X and Windows (? XP) and with R versions ? 2.11 Thanks in advance. Dennis Dennis Fisher MD P <