similar to: pseudo zap channel - how to get rid of it ?

Dear List members, After succesfully installing the * on a couple of systems, and putting them on test, I observed that there is an intermittent call drop on PSTN line. The systems are - Dell Optiplex P3/500MHz/128MB - Built-in ethernet - 1 X100P (Motorolla chip) card on PCI - 10G HDD etc. - Asterisk April 17 CVS. - 2 Mediatrix FXS ATA (4 phones) - 2 Grandstream phones. - sip.conf, zaptel.comnf

The machine in question is a DL360 G3 R03 Xeon DP 3060-512/533 (part number: 322471-421). It's the first HP-branded model we've had so far (previously all Compaq branded). It has 1Gb of memory and a couple of drives on the on-board SCSI controller (setup for mirroring in the SCSI bios). No SMP is setup right now (doesn't get far enough to do anything with it!). In any case, this

Hello: Does anyone know how to configure any of the Cisco 79XX phones to get custom ringers when using chan_sccp with Asterisk? I've currently got Asterisk's 05-24-04 CVS-HEAD and Zozo's 0.2 release of chan_sccp. I've tried using ringlist.dat, but that appears to only be for the SIP phones... Thanks for any input, Andrew

Kevin Walsh noted that his SPA-2000 takes time from his local NTP server in a post back on Fri June 25. Q: Where do you tell it to use NTP? I'm a bit confused as to where my SPA-2000 is currently getting its time. I told it GMT-5 in the misc section but it doesn't really tell me where its going for this. Is it just broadcasting looking for ntp? The net of my problem is that it is 1 hour

Hi I have found in http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2004-July/056111.html (Hack to make * -> (H323) -> CCM -> IOS GW work) that i need a special version of chan_h323, because of the External RTP problem. Do you know exactly which version is it? Or do i need an unofficial patch? Thanx Andr?s

Hi, On Friday we changed our Telco-Provider (from German Telekom to Mnet) and recieved new Numbers. I changed the extensions in extension conf to match the new numbers. But i always get: Jul 18 12:10:39 WARNING[245776]: pbx.c:1780 ast_pbx_run: Channel 'CAPI[contr1/89064934]/0' sent into invalid extension 's' in context 'default', but no invalid handler I only changed the

I've tried to compile rate-engine 0.5.2 on Fedora Core 1, Redhat 9 and OpenNA Linux 1.0 and all give me an "Error 1" after typing "make" but with no real reason given. Just a few standard/non-critical warning messages, and then suddenly "Error 1" Anybody successfully compile Rate Engine? The least cost routing module for Asterisk? Thanks in advance.

Folks, My question concerns the SIP Notify that is being sent to ... device. You can see it in the following line: Voicemail: 0/0 Shows no Voice mail but I did leave a voice mail at the extension. Any suggestion on what I should look for in my * setup. I am not worried about the 481 coming back for the other side yet. Once I get a handle on the Notify, I'll work on the 481.

Happens quite often. X100P FXO card puts the PSTN line offhook, so that no calls go out or come in. The outside callers get a busy siganl while inside callers cant dial PSTN. Its a DELL optiplex P3 128MB ram 500MHz processor. Here is some more info: (see the zapata.conf in the end) Please direct me where to look for problem. Thanks!!! ======================================== pbx1*CLI> zap

Is it possible to get a few 7960's and asterisk to allow all of the 7960 phones to use one extentsion and can only be used by one person at a time, have it indicate on the other 7960's when one of the others has the line engaged. Basicly so like I can setup a rule when an incoming call comes from IAX to divert to this extension, it will ring the extension (thus all phones), and allow me to

So IMO, if we modify the VF calculation for targets/subtargets using TTI where higher VF is supported The vectorizer’s scope will become wider. Did/do you foresee any issue with this? Thanks, Shahid From: Nadav Rotem [mailto:nrotem at apple.com] Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2014 2:47 AM To: Shahid, Asghar-ahmad Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Vectorization factor limitation in

I am having problem with Samba 2.x. I am be able to login to Samba without a problem :). When I login to "Shahid" account it directed to "/home/shahid" but I can still can see another user home dir too? why that so like I login as "shahid" account then can see "/home/shahid" but why I can see " /home/test" too - it shouldnt be? Each user

Hi Shahid, Thank you so much for your response. You suggested approach is what I am right now using. However, it seems that the overhead is a little bit high because we are introducing two more instructions. I was wondering if there was a cheaper way to do it. Best, Zhi On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Shahid, Asghar-ahmad < Asghar-ahmad.Shahid at amd.com> wrote: > Hi Zhi, > >

Hi Nadav/Devs I am exploring Loop Vectorizer to vectorize i8 scalar operations into 8xi8 vector operation. I was expecting the Loop Vectorizer to analyze the profitability for vectorization factor(VF) of 8, However it is not doing so due to the widest type calculation done for the blocks inside the loop. May be I am missing something, however, I am curious to know why Loop Vectorizer limits the

Hi Asghar-Ahmed, I saw your last ping - sorry, I'm away on vacation and back on Wednesday. Generally, I'm not sure that having both absd/hadd and sad are compatible with the discussions going on in other threads, for example my thread about min and max. Given that those two intrinsics are fairly trivial to match , I don't see the need to have two different canonical forms. James On

Hello, Can someone recommend me where is best place to find Asterisk Expert/Consultant for freelance work? If you are interested to work as a freelancer, you can email me directly. Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20150902/5a99cbfe/attachment.html>

Thanks, Shahid. It is fixed now. On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Shahid, Asghar-ahmad < Asghar-ahmad.Shahid at amd.com> wrote: > Hi zhi, > > > > You have to also pass the value type to getDecalaration() API such as > > > > Value* sqrtv = Intrinsic::getDeclaration(M, Intrinsic::x86_sse2_sqrt_pd, > v->getType()); > > > > Regards, > >

Hi All, I would like to introduce intrinsics to generate efficient codes for 'absolute differences', 'horizontal add' and 'sum of absolute differences' Idioms used by user programs. Identifying these idioms at lower level (Codegen) is complex. These idioms can be identified in LV/SLP and vectorized using above intrinsics to generate better code. Proposal: 1. Add

On 4 May 2015 at 08:37, Shahid, Asghar-ahmad <Asghar-ahmad.Shahid at amd.com> wrote: > My worry is regarding the query for cost calculation for specific SAD > instructions such as ‘psad’ (X86) or ‘usad’ (ARM) in Loop Vectorizer. Hi Shahid, The vectorizer's cost model has the ability to return different costs for the same instruction based on the arguments (scalar/vector,

> why in order to add this particular instruction (sum elements in a vector) I need to add an insrinsic? Adding intrinsic is not the only way, it is one of the way and user WILL-NOT be required to invoke It specifically. Currently LLVM does not have any instruction to directly represent “sum of elements in a vector” and generate your particular instruction.However, you can do it without