similar to: Compile error with CVS HEAD zaptel

I had a compile problem with the CVS I downloaded on 21 June. I have a Debian box with 2.4.18 kernel (version needed for support of Conexant ADSL). There is a difficulty with Zaptel build regarding HDLC detection. It tries to build it in and then results in unresolved kernel symbols and fails to load. I have had to comment out the entire HDLC defines in zconfig.h to get a driver to install at

Hi, I have Debian Linux with kernel 2.6.6. The all packages compiled except ZAPTEL where I have the following error: voipgw:/usr/src/zaptel# make make -C /usr/src/linux-2.6 SUBDIRS=/usr/src/zaptel modules make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.6' CC [M] /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.o /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c: In function `zt_net_open': /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c:1165: warning:

Hi iam installing zaptel 1.2.10 on my FC5 when i make iam getting following error any one suggest me whats wrong, i have installed source also in the same server. grep: /lib/modules/2.6.15-1.2054_FC5/build/include/linux/autoconf.h: No such file or directory ZAPTELVERSION="1.2.10" build_tools/make_version_h > version.h.tmp if cmp -s version.h.tmp version.h ; then echo; else \

I greatly appreciate the help at last Monday's installfest and especially am grateful to Chris and Lenny. Now I am reconfiguring the installfest computer to add Zaptel using the instructions at http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+Zaptel+Installation There is now a Digium 4 port card installed. In regards to Zaptel there are some questions on zconfig.h. Should I: #define

I'm trying to get zaptel 1.0.2 compiled on FC2 or FC3 and I'm getting compile time errors. Systems include: FC2: Linux xxxxxxxxxxxx 2.6.9-1.3_FC2 #1 Mon Nov 15 14:46:43 EST 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux FC3: Linux xxxxxxxxxxxx 2.6.9-1.681_FC3 #1 Thu Nov 18 15:13:22 EST 2004 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux /usr/home/bwright/zaptel-1.0.2> make linux26 ... make -C /usr/src/linux-2.6

While trying to compile zaptel 1.2.8 on a FC5 I get the following error: /lib/modules/2.6.19-1.2288.fc5smp/build make -C /lib/modules/2.6.19-1.2288.fc5smp/build SUBDIRS=/usr/src/zaptel-1.2.8 modules make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.19-1.2288.fc5-smp-i686' CC [M] /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.8/zaptel.o In file included from /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.8/zaptel.c:40:

CC [M] /home/silentm/MessageNet/digium/zaptel-1.4.10/kernel/wcte12xp/vpmadt032.o CC [M] /home/silentm/MessageNet/digium/zaptel-1.4.10/kernel/wcte12xp/GpakApi.o CC [M] /home/silentm/MessageNet/digium/zaptel-1.4.10/kernel/wcte12xp/../voicebus.o LD [M] /home/silentm/MessageNet/digium/zaptel-1.4.10/kernel/wcte12xp/wcte12xp.o

I hope someone can offer me some help with this. Basically, the current CVS version of Zaptel will not compile under Fedora Core 4. I have closely followed the directions in http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+Fedora+Core+3 using the versions given in the FC4 distro with no luck. Here's the output when I run "make linux26". Any help would be great. TIA.

I keep running into the dead end that it can't find config.h in the source tree. It looks like newer kernels don't use it anymore. Someone ran into this awhile back when compiling 1.2 and it looks as though the issue was never resolved. Any ideas? Last time I tried this, I was on fedora core 5 64bit and all went well. It's not working on this newer setup Any ideas on what I can do

I am attempting to deploy a TE210P with one port configured (all 24 channels) as Cisco HDLC, currently running 2.6.11 FC4 with HDLC module compiled. HDLC (RAW) appears to work fine, however, using Cisco HDLC (via sethdlc & sethdlc-new) results in no traffic being encapsulated or transmitted via the hdlc0 interface. Is there anybody here currently running a similar configuration on a

All, I have upgraded by home machine from Fedora Core 5 (FC5) to the recent FC6 and am struggling to build Zaptel-1.2.10 and Asterisk-1.2.13 on the box... which is an Intep P4 2.8GHz HT processor box with 845 chipset, hence the kernel installed is 2.6.18-1.2798.fc6-i686 so we hve this: [root@gate zaptel-1.2.10]# uname -a Linux gate.tubby.org 2.6.18-1.2798.fc6 #1 SMP Mon Oct 16 14:54:20

I'm using bristuffed Asterisk with ISDN/ZAPHFC I have VERY ugly (outgoing) sound through ISDN/HFC if echocancel=yes in zapata.conf, but without echocancel I have bad (incoming) echo Through PSTN/FXO sound is ok with or without echocancel. I tried other echo cancellers (in zconfig.h) two times: ECHO_CAN_KB1 (this was default) ECHO_CAN_MARK2 ECHO_CAN_MG2 after any change I compiled (make

Hi, I'm still strugling with getting an easy to use conference system implemented. I did have app_conference running, but today I upgraded asterisk to 1.0.9 and it stopped working. I've tried following the instructions for compiling app_conference on 1.0.7 but it didn't work. So I went back to ztdummy (I've not had any luck getting this to compile on FC2). Anyhoo, I've

Thank you for the suggestions Andrew. I have not come across some of them before and will give them a shot. Based on my reading, changing the motherboard should have minimal impact unless that motherboard and the TDM400P don't get along (aka. IRQ sharing). I have disabled everything that is not needed and I do not believe I have any IRQ problems and I am NEVER wrong ;). Calls are crisp and

Problem: Zap Channels Disappear @ random intervals. (Channels have disappeared on both gateways twice this week). My Setup: I have 2 Dell 1850 Power Edge Servers - Configured as. P4 2.8Ghz 512 ECC Memory SCSI Array (2 Drives Mirror) Configuration is really simple the boxes are setup as PSTN termination gateways: (SIP/ZAP) - We are running a SER/Asterisk Hybrid. My asterisk

Hi list, would like to know if some of you have tested asterisk connected to an EADS 6550 analogique PBX (also know as Nexpan50). Our set up is a Dell Optiplex with 1 TDM400 4 FXO, 1 TDM400 4 FXS, (no other card, each of them have their own IRQ) all ports connected to the EADS. We have GS ATA286 as EP. Calling from ATA to ATA give a perfect sound. Calling to PSTN numbers or reverse side,

Dearest List, I guess I missed this point: Is it true that if you change the echo canceler in zconfig.h, and then recompile/install your zap modules, that for this to be taken into effect by * you must then recompile/install *? I would have figured that the zap echo cancellation method was independent of *, and I don't recall seeing any docs mentioning either way. Sincerely, Brent A.

Just updated from CVS 12-23-03 to tarbal 0.7.1. Identical settings in zconfig.h for echo cancellation (MARK2, aggressive OFF). The echo got worse, much worse. It takes longer to train and overspeak now disables cancellation, which it did not before. In fact, I now have echo on VoIP to VoIP on our local network, which I never had before. Was something changed with the echo supression which

I think I have a bad FXS module on my TDM400P. Channel map: >> >> Channel 01: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) >> Channel 02: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 02) >> >> 2 channels configured. >> ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: No such device or address (6) The zaptel loads ok, but the wctdm reports No such device or address and stays loaded. The

I figured I'd answer my own thread and document what it took to get rid of the echo at my location. For those of you trying to get rid of echo, let me tell you, "what worked for that guy, probably won't work for you". I think we've all heard that before, and it's true. Let me assure you that echo can be removed from your phone lines. At 20 hours into my 40