similar to: hdlc setup routing question

I got it figured out now. In case anyone else comes across it - this is what I had to do: Sethdlc hdlc0 mode ansi Ifconfig hdlc0 up ***NO IP INFO SET*** Sethdlc hdlc0 create <dlci number> Ifconfig pvc0 <local ip> pointopoint <remote ip> up Then set your default gateway to the <remote ip> listed in pvc0. That's about it!! Hope it helps! -----Original

All, I am trying to configure hdlc support on T100P Digium card - everything seems ok... but it just does not work at all. I was able to compile all drivers, the light on the card becomes green when I plug T1 link.... but I even can't ping default router IP... there is no data coming back to me, so I am confused completely now. Also I tried both protocols - raw hdlc and cisco hdlc. The

Hello lartc! I have strange problem setting load balancing over 4 interfaces. Something won''t accept more than 3 interfaces, While setting: ip route add default scope global \ nexthop via 0.0.0.0 dev pvc0 weight 1 \ nexthop via 0.0.0.0 dev pvc1 weight 1 \ nexthop via 0.0.0.0 dev pvc2 weight 1 It''s ok: ip r l default nexthop dev pvc0

Hello everyone, We have recently turned up a new T1 from McLeod (Midwestern CLEC). It is configured like so: /etc/zaptel.conf: loadzone=us defaultzone=us span=1,0,0,esf,b8zs ;(also tried 1,1,0,esf,b8zs) bchan=13-23 nethdlc=1-12 dchan=24 /etc/zapata.conf: switchtype=national context=pri-in signalling=pri_cpe group=1 channel => 13-23 I can get hdlc0 (and pvc0) up just fine after the

Hello, I''m trying to boot kernels from the 2.6.23.x line as paravirt domUs, 64-bit xen-3.1.0 and xen-3.1.2 are used on the test boxes. xm create starts up the domU without any problems according to the logs, however, the started domU does not output anything apart from a single tab (if I start it with -c option ), and eats up 100% CPU. Config file of the domU is as follows: ----

Hi List, I am sorry that I may bring the old question to the community. My question is 1. How can we determine if asterisk is working normally or not ? what kind watchdog process do we have at this moment ? 2. In case the running asterisk is mulfucntion, is there any available way to auto restart asterisk ?? Please advise if you could. Thanks.

hi below is sysvinit script for handling tcng-script .... please excuse my bad bash skils, correct me where i''m doing stupid things :") what is left... many things, if i have time i will implement them too : - start [devices] - and then correct handling of service lock files i.e. per device lock file - stats blah ... - all ideas are welcome !! - test or some such, i mean the

Hello all, I tried these commands (taken from lartc HOWTO). #tc qdisc add dev pvc0 root handle 1: prio #tc qdisc add dev pvc0 parent 1:1 handle 10: sfq #tc qdisc add dev pvc0 parent 1:2 handle 20: sfq #tc qdisc add dev pvc0 parent 1:3 handle 30: sfq When I try to watch at the qdisc statistics with the command: #tc -s qdisc ls dev pvc0 I have this response: qdisc sfq 30: quantum 1516b

Hi, I believe the issues raised by this message are the same as mine, more on a commercial sense than for self use, but mostly the same. I've seen posts where real-life installations are mentioned, but not a reference to how Asterisk is working on production (and productive) environments. Any experiences would be very welcome I believe, not only on pure technical, but wider, sense. Thanks

List members; I have been reading the digest for some time now and I would like to ask some conceptual questions. I am a telecommunications systems designer and not a software guy, but I have tried and used a number of the tools availabel in the LARTC and Iptables, and many of the other great things included in Linux. We are designing commercial products and I don''t want to ask my

my target is to produce a linux router with T100p to Fract T1 24chan to ethernet and TDM 4channel FXO. I have not been able to get nethdlc to work, just get zaptel networking not configured if I set bchan and dchan the card comes to life, but I don't believe this is correct for what I want to accomplish. according to markster@ this is the way they do it. using (multiple distro versions

All, I'm having a heck of a time getting hdlc to work on kernel 2.6.11.9 .. I compiled hdlc, hdlc_gen, hdlc_cisco, hdlc_raw, into the kernel (note into, and not 'modules'). System comes up, I configured zaptel.conf span=1,0,0,esf,b8zs nethdlc=1-24 modprobe wct4xxp ztcfg sethdlc hdlc0 cisco ifconfig hdlc0 up All of this works fine, believe it or not. I have a T1 cross plugged

I'm setting up a T1 for both voice and data and was wanting to know the steps involved. I've recompiled zaptel for ZAPATA_NET support and setup my /etc/zaptel.conf: Fxsks=1-10 Nethdlc=11-24 Modprobe wct1xxp works fine and my voice lines work. Now when I use the provided sethdlc, I use the following commands: Sethdlc hdlc0 mode ansi Ifconfig hdlc0 <ipaddress> <network>

I have my Linux 2.6 kernel with the necessary HDLC config and also recompiled zaptel accordingly. On modprobe, I get: Found a Wildcard: Digium Wildcard T100P T1/PRI Debug: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:2000 in_atomic():0[expected: 0], irqs_disabled():1 [<0211e605>] __might_sleep+0x82/0x8c [<02144643>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x1d/0x57 [<42ad7a2c>]

Hello! I want to use TE121 for E1 data link to cisco. Really only for tests now. So I wrote: span = 1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 #span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs nethdlc=1-31:hdlc0 may be first line is wrong, problem is somewhere else anyway. Just because I get: # dahdi_cfg DAHDI_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: Function not implemented (38) This is centos 6.4 box with dahdi 2.7.0.1. Could you tell me is it

Hello I have the following scenario: [mynicecontext] exten => 2000,1,Dial(SIP/deviceA&SIP/deviceB&SIP/deviceC) As expected, by dialing 2000, all three devices will ring. And that's fine. However, there are situations where I only want "deviceA" and "deviceB" to ring. I would like to have an extension to dial in order to modify the dialplan. Here is what I

Hi, I''m trying to configure QoS on my linux in the following manner: I have a main link with 64K, so I divided it in 3 classes of 18K, 14K and 9K with an excess (not used for classified traffic, just to be shared) of 23K. This excess should be distributed proportonally among the 3 classes, that is, the class that has more rate should borrow more bandwidth. What is happening is

dev seems to be slow to respond, so maybe someone here has accomplished this... I''m trying to bridge an hdlc0 interface to a guest, but I believe the network-scripts only support eth* devices. Any clue on how to get my hdlc0 p-t-p link interface bridged? Any tap suggestions/syntax? Simply adding hdlc0 with brctl is incorrect syntax. Thanks in advance. -Cody Tubbs Systems Analyst

Hello * community, I have 2 * boxes spanning a t1 with hdlc. I'm trying to route packets so people on a subnet seperate of the * boxes can browse the boxes on the * spanned subnet. The * boxes and the boxes on subnet controlled by * can see everything. The boxes on the seperate subnet inside the company can only see so far as the first * box and can't ping across the span.

A site I administer has dual T1''s. We have this set up according to NANO-HOWTO[1] using Julian''s routes patch on a late model 2.4 kernel. All is well, has been working well for a long time. Recently one of our T1 providers went belly up and we got something better. Now we have a /28 where previously we only used one IP per interface. Present interfaces: eth0 - T1#1, single