similar to: 1800 Provider

We manage our own VOIP solution using Asterisk. Has anyone had success with an IP-PSTN provider? I'm looking for someone to terminate SIP calls to the PSTN in the Seattle, Washington area. (vice-versa as well if possible) Yes, I could do it myself via asterisk and digium cards but I would like to consider other options. Any opinions? Thanks, Chad -------------- next part

Hello, We are getting error: Call rejected: 407 Proxy Authentication Required - if a user is trying to call using * over a long latency network (around 600 ms). There is no problem when the same user is trying to make a call with low latency network (around 300 ms). I have included the debug and log messages for Asterisk. This call is done with SJphone, the same problem exists with ATA;

Hello, How can we monitor agents voice channels for training or quality control purpose. While agent is talking to a customer we need to be able to monitor voice channel (the actual voice conversation). If possible we would like to do that without putting agents in conference rooms. Is there any possible way to do that? Has someone done this? In addition when we tried to put the agent in

Hi, Can anyone please let me know what is the latest stable version of asterisk. Thanks, shailesh --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040118/fa0aba47/attachment.htm

Hi! I have a new problem with my SIP device.I have done some changes and now I receive continuosly a SIP message: "501" "Not impelmented" back from the SIP Gateway. I can see that it doesn't register to Asterisk. I have in the SIP device: Registrar 1: UnRegistered to: 2222 registrar: 188.208.12.237 5060 expires: 2000 name: gateway passwd: 123 My

? attached the dovecot -n, linked files, debug log lines during a standard client login root at buserver:/etc/dovecot/conf.d# doveconf -n # 2.2.13: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.16.0-6-amd64 x86_64 Debian 8.11 auth_debug = yes auth_debug_passwords = yes auth_mechanisms = plain login auth_verbose = yes auth_verbose_passwords = plain debug_log_path = syslog disable_plaintext_auth = no

Now the attributes are correctly read for the user test at onnet.ch <mailto:test at onnet.ch>, but other users are not able to authenticate anymore. root at buserver:/var/spool/postfix/virtual/onnet.ch/test/Maildir/.super# doveadm user test at onnet.ch field value uid 5000 gid 5000 home /var/spool/postfix/virtual/onnet.ch/test/ mail maildir:~/Maildir quota_rule *:bytes=1073741824 acl

May you please clarify that? Where should I omit the userdb_ prefix? Which of my attempts are you pointing at? As stated, I omitted the userdb_ prefix when working with an LDAP attribute. > On 7 Aug 2018, at 10:03, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > with ldap userdb, you need to omit the userdb_ prefix. > > Aki > > > On 07.08.2018 10:54, Simeon Ott

still the same? root at buserver:/etc/dovecot# doveadm user test2 at onnet.ch field valueuserdb lookup: user test2 at onnet.ch doesn't exist relevant config output from doveconf -n userdb { args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf driver = ldap result_success = continue-ok } userdb { args = username_format=%Lu /etc/dovecot/share.passwd driver = passwd-file result_failure =

Hello Is it possible to limit the ability of sharing it?s own mailboxes to only a few users? We have a few sensitive mailboxes of users where the ability to share via IMAP SETACL should be prevented. I tried the following so far? doveadm acl remove -u test at onnet.ch INBOX user=test at onnet.ch admin but when doing this the admin rights are still there doveadm acl rights -u test at

http://repo.dovecot.org/ <http://repo.dovecot.org/> Sami > On 8 Aug 2018, at 10.27, Simeon Ott <simeon.ott at onnet.ch> wrote: > > Okay, this seems to be due to the fact that the option ?use_globals_only" is supported only in v2.2.31+ > We are on Debian jessie with dovecot v2.2.13 ? even an upgrade to current stable stretch won?t help (dovecot v2.2.27). So we will

Hello, I have gotten an application to run well in Wine. However, when this application tries to print a text document, the size of the text is so small that it looks like dots on the page. It is not readable. The printing of graphics is better. Any advice on how to get the output text to be larger would be greatly appreciated. Aram J. Agajanian

Has anyone tried to wrap your SMB session inside another TCP protocol like SSH? I'm trying to sync files across two linux machines but my broadband provider is blocking SMB and port 139 traffic. If anyone has any information it would be greatly appreciated. Aram -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type:

Hello, I stumbled across a 5-year-old post on the dovecot list about changing the dovecot hierarchy separator to enable shared mailboxes (http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2011-January/056201.html <http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2011-January/056201.html>). At the moment I?m stuck in a pretty similar situation. Migrated from courier to dovecot 2 years ago and preserved the

Hi I had observed the following problem in R (also C, Matlab, and Python). sprintf('%1.2g\n', 3.15) give 3.1 instead of 3.2 whereas an input of 3.75 gives 3.8. Java's System.out.printf is ok though. > round(3.75,1) [1] 3.8 > round(3.15,1) [1] 3.1 Similar outcome with sprintf in R. However, the right answer should be 3.2 Regards Teckpor [[alternative HTML version

Hey everyone, I have a question about vif-common.sh. I run multiple bridges attached on dummy interfaces, which allow me to put guests in seperate subnets (routed through the dom0). As you might expect I already have quite extensive iptables scripts to accomidate this kind of routing. I was just hoping someone on this list can confirm, that I understand what the iptables lines in vif-common.sh

Ok, now thats a gadget i want to have :-) http://www.global-teck.com/english/newproduct.php http://www.global-teck.com/english/telecomproducts.php Anyone knows something similar that would work with asterisk, or any chances getting this to work? Regards, Andreas _________________________________________________________________ Need more speed? Get Xtra Broadband @

Hi, Im trying to compile kernel 3.0.4 inside Centos 5 DomU The steps I do are Make bzImage Make modules Make modules_install Depmod -a mkinitrd /boot/initrd.img-3.0.4 3.0.4 but them im getting this -bash-3.2# mkinitrd /boot/initrd.img-3.0.4 3.0.4 ls: /etc/modprobe.d/*.conf: No such file or directory No module ehci-hcd found for kernel 3.0.4, aborting. If I exclude the

Hey hope this opne is a "make senser". Has anyone tried the "Subject line" combo?, I''ve compiled a dozen src.rpm kernel 3.0 and 3.1 packages with no luck to try native upstream Dom0 kernel support with no success, just a kernel oops and constant reboots. I followed Fedora''s wiki on building a custom kernel, even used F16''s .config which also was a

Hey hope this opne is a "make senser". Has anyone tried the "Subject line" combo?, I''ve compiled a dozen src.rpm kernel 3.0 and 3.1 packages with no luck to try native upstream Dom0 kernel support with no success, just a kernel oops and constant reboots. I followed Fedora''s wiki on building a custom kernel, even used F16''s .config which also was a