similar to: meetme conf-background.agi

Hello everybody!!! I really need your help guys, I am using the AGI mode in meetme application, and I want that AGI should wait for an input from the client/user i.e. a digit and then proceed, but I have used that AGI function agi->wait_for_digit(), but no use....my agi just passes, or ignores this function, where AGI should stop here and wait for the input.... .....my extension in my

This gives EXDEV for clone operations that btrfs could otherwise execute and with slight change of circumstances will actually execute fine. Imagine we have a btrfs on /dev/mapper/foobar with subvols /foo and /bar. Let’s also imagine top of said fs in mounted at /mnt. In this case, a cross-subvol clone of /mnt/foo/srcfile to /mnt/bar/dstfile will succeed. However, if only the individual

Dear R-devel: The following code seems to allow one function to permanently modify a calling function. I did not expect this would be allowed (short of more creative gymnastics) and wonder if it is really intended. (I can see other ways to accomplish the intended task of this code [e.g. via match.call instead of substitute below] that do not trigger the problem, but I don't think that is

Hi all, assume the following problem: a function call takes a function object and a data variable and calls this function with this data on a remote host. It uses serialization to pass both the function and the data via a socket connection to a remote host. The problem is that depending on the way we call the same construct, the function may be serialized to include the data, which was not

I am using rsync in my project for copying database binary files over the network from active module to standby module. Once in a while files found to be corrupt on standby module when copying is done first time.When I checked the active module at that time files found to be proper. rsync is completing successful without giving any errors. On comparing both files I see a big hole in standby file

Hi R-Helpers: I?m trying to fit the same linear model to a bunch of variables in a data frame, so I was trying to adapt the codes John Fox, Spencer Graves and Peter Dalgaard proposed and discused yesterday on this e-mail list: for (y in df[, 3:5]) { mod = lm(y ~ Trt*Dose, data = x, contrasts = list(Trt = contr.sum, Dose = contr.sum)) Anova(mod, type = "III") } ## by John Fox or for

I initially sent this to the biocore mailing list - but it was suggested that r-devel would also find it interesting. Many of us use a macro like #define CALL_DEF(fname, nargs) { #fname, (DL_FUNC)&fname, nargs} for use in function registration for use with .Call. For example, using the example from R Extension manual, if we want to register a C function myCall with three arguments, we

Hi I am tryng to mirror a locked away, secure web service for testing purposes and am almost there. Hoever as part of the definition for the structure of the call to the webservice, I have this struct. class MyCall < ActionWebService::Struct member :username, :string member :password, :string member :"remote-ip", :string end However this does not work... Should

I would like to be able, inside a function, to create a new function, and use it as part of a formula as an argument to, say, gnls or nlme. for example: MyTop <- function(data=dta) { Cexp <- function(dose,A,B,m){...} Model <- as.formula(paste("y","~ Cexp(",paste(formals(Cexp),collapse =", "),")")) MyCall <-

I understand that HangUp() hangs up the calling channel. I want to hangup the called channel. SIP/mycall-xxxxx calls and bridges with DAHDI/1-1. I send SIP/.... to listen to a long, very long, file. GoSub(play-long-file,s,1) [play-long-file] exten=s,1, ;;; Here I want to hangup DAHDI/1-1, the called channel same=n,Playback(very-long-file) same=n,Hangup() How do I hangup the called channel,

On 03/16/2016 10:23 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Commit c3083c7082 ("nv50/ir: add support for BUFFER accesses") disabled / > commented out some of the old resource handling code, but not all of it. > > Effectively all of it is dead already, if we ever enter the old code > paths in handeLOAD / handleSTORE / handleATOM we will get an exception > due to trying to access the

I have just got a Cisco 7941G and am experiencing the exact same problem (phone is requesting .tlv file from TFTP server and never asks for .cnf.xml file). The phone originally had SCCP on it, but I downloaded and flashed with the latest Cisco SIP image (8.4(3) released 2009-01-13). In reading your message below, it looks like you were going to try an incremental upgrade?did you have any

On 9/12/18 1:22 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, at 2:19 PM, sean darcy wrote: >> I understand that HangUp() hangs up the calling channel. I want to >> hangup the called channel. >> >> SIP/mycall-xxxxx calls and bridges with DAHDI/1-1. >> >> I send SIP/.... to listen to a long, very long, file. > > Define "send". How are you

hello everyone, thanks to todd 1.2.21 is out :) every release getting better, i would like to get consensus on these "important" bugs: #252078 logtail: should depend on perl >= 5.8 sarge as any other modern linux distro use perl 5.8.x, it's even inside of its base. backports are under the peril of its author if no one voices up, i'll close that bug in the next days.

When I do rsync -av --backup --backup-dir=/dir1/dir2/Backup \ /dir1/dir2/dir3 machine:/dir1/dir2/dir3 I get /dir1/dir2/Backup/dir3/... /Backup/dir3/dir4/... i.e. the tree under 'dir3' (my source tree) gets created under .../Backup. This is fine. But when I do the same thing with a single file like rsync -av --backup --backup-dir=/dir1/dir2/Backup \ /dir1/dir2/file

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Simona Simona via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to add a new instruction after a given instruction in a basic >> block. >> Until LLVM 3.7, I was using the following code:

Hi First off, I apologise if this is covered somewhere and I just don''t get it... I''ve looked far and wide .... As a part of my current project I need to hook up to a particular XMLRPC webservice that won''t be available for me to use until close to launch date... So I am trying to recreate the webservice that mirrors the live one so I can test my application

Why not just use Instruction::insertAfter()? I->insertAfter(new_inst); On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Ryan Taylor via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Try incrementing the iterator before using. > > On Sep 5, 2016 10:26, "Simona Simona via llvm-dev" < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Daniel

Dear R people We have two packages, where the first package (geoR) is required by the second (geoRglmm). Both packages have functions calling C-code via .C(). We would like to call C-functions included in the first package from within the C-code in the second package. Is this possible? An appropriate header file was included in the src directory of the second package but this alone did not

Hi, This patch adds a BSD compatible install script (copied from gcc-2.95.2) to 1.2pre14. The script has a X-style license. The script will be used if configure doesn't find a proper install program on the system. Remember to run autoconf and set execute (755) permissions for install-sh when the patch has been applied. -- Niels Kristian Bech Jensen -- nkbj at image.dk --