Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "list batching frequency"
2017 Aug 03
4
pam auth problem
>> auth: in openpam_parse_chain(): /etc/pam.d/dovecot(1): missing or invalid facility
> 
> I do not think that it has something to do with the dovecot settings
> itself but perhaps with the pam facility settings instead?
i can believe that.  any clues to debug?
randy
2017 Aug 03
2
pam auth problem
>> passdb {
>>   driver = pam
>> }
>> passdb {
>>   driver = pam
>>   name = pam
>> }
> Are those two passdb blocks intentional?
> 
> One of them is missing the name parameter.
doh.  first removed.
Aug  3 06:49:23 psg auth: in openpam_parse_chain(): /etc/pam.d/dovecot(1): missing or invalid facility
Aug  3 06:49:23 psg dovecot:
2004 May 22
4
sip call using name in sip.conf
i try to place a call
    exten => _X.,1,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN}@foo:5061,60,Ttr)
where sip.conf has an entry
    [foo]
    secret=torture
    callerid="local ext 103" <19146665555>
    type=friend
    fromuser=asterisk
    auth=both
    host=dynamic
    canreinvite=yes
    context=in-914
    mailbox=001
i get
    May 22 23:11:31 WARNING[140400128]: chan_sip.c:902 create_addr: \
2004 May 18
5
want to set a var in sip.conf
i have extensions in locations across a number of telco area codes.
when someone in seattle picks up and dials 91234567, it would be
nice to transform it to 92061234567.  i would prefer not to have
an extension context per area code.  it would be cool to be able
to set a variable in the sip.conf bit for each phone with it's
geographic default area code.
or other folk may have a better hack. 
2004 May 18
1
how does a sip://user@dom.ain url come in
if the dns has
   _sip._tcp.my.dom.   SRV     0 0 5060 asterisk.dom.ain.
   _sip._udp.my.dom.   SRV     0 0 5060 asterisk.dom.ain.
where asterisk.dom.ain. is an A RR of the asterisk pbx.
how does a call to sip://user@my.dom come in to asterisk
so i can route it?
do i just put in sip.conf
  [username]
  context = from-url-username
and extensions.com
  [from-url-username]
  exten =>
2004 Aug 12
9
Convert Cisco 7960 to sip
<div><br><div><br><br><br><br><br><font color="#990099"><br></font><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px;"><div><div><br>
  <asterisk-users-request
2003 Sep 07
5
@LongLink
what the heck is 
# ls -li /usr/\@LongLink 
3 ----------  1 root  wheel  111 Jan  1  1970 /usr/@LongLink
randy
2004 Jul 05
3
Randy Bush is a destructive force with a hidden professional agenda
.                                       Monday, July 5, 2004
                                        15:50:06 (-08:00hrs UTC)
Hello asterisk-users,
  From the following post:
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Joe Baptista wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jul 2004, Randy Bush wrote:
>> i did not criticize the protocol.  remember, my question started
>> with
>>
>> >> i am looking at iax to
2003 Sep 01
1
v6 in tonight's cvsup
just cvsupped to get the panic cure.  hosts with v6 enabled get
lock-ups.  no detail yet, as i am remote from them and am deciding
whether to wait for remote hands to power cycle or to start
driving.
but two of them got very very net soggy.  and i went in out of
band to the console, disabled v6 in /etc/rc.conf, rebooted, and
they're fine.  the third host is dead to the world :-(
[ and i can
2004 Oct 08
5
SPA3000 as a replacement for X100P
I am still haveing problems (echo) with my X100P but I'm thinking it has
more to do with the server it is in which is not a negotiable item at
this time. My question then is to the use of SPA3000's as a replacement
from the FXO standpoint.
1. Can you setup the FXO port to recognize distinctinve ring and call a
different context like you can do with Zap channels? Being able to call
a
2004 May 18
2
registering in sipphone
for inbound calls, i can register
    context = from-sipphone
    register => 1747xxxxxxx:passwd@proxy01.sipphone.com
but how do i configure to make outbound calls to them?
    exten => _1747XXXXXXX,1,GoTo(dial-sipphone,${EXTEN},1)
    ....
    [dial-sipphone]
    ;
    ; SIP to sipphone.com
    ;
    exten => _X.,1,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN}@??????)
                                     ^^^^^^
2004 Jun 17
4
7960 straight through?
if i go off hook and dial 666 from an internal sipura spa-x000
(at extn 141), it rings straight through to extn 666.
using the same dialplan, from a cisco 7960 with 7.1 sip code
(at extn 142), i have to
   go off hook
   hit NewCall
   punch 142  (or any valid extn in the dialplan)
   hit Dial
   then dial 666
wtf?
sip.conf for crisco
    [fiji]
    callerid="crisco" <142>
   
2004 Jul 05
9
iax or sip
i am looking at iax to see if it is applicable to my needs.  i
would appreciate any corrections of what i think i have understood
but probably have not.
iax uses udp and traverses nats.  neither of these seems useful to
me.  i loathe nats, and udp is not well-behaved in the sense of
congestion avoidance.
trunking will save some bytes in flight iff one has four or more
streams moving between two
2019 Aug 23
2
non-terminating processes
FreeBSD psg.com 11.3-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p3
dovecot 2.3.6 (7eab80676)  (latest from binary package system)
symptom: multiple imap4s users complain that they can not fetch mail
stopping and restarting dovecot is a temporary workaround
dovenull  3713    0.0  0.0  11036   6816  -  I    02:27       0:00.17 dovecot/imap-login
user19    3714    0.0  0.0   9464   4756  -  S    02:27      
2004 Apr 14
2
freebsd?
the freebsd port tree version is dead because of the openh323
issues.  before i start hacking, i am hoping someone else has
a freebsd version that will build on -current.  and i do not
care about h232.
dare i hope?
randy
2004 Jun 14
2
inviting an spa-x000
sip debug shows that my * is trying to invite my spa and
being told 404
    Reliably Transmitting:
    OPTIONS sip:42.7.11.194 SIP/2.0
    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 128.9.0.39:5060;branch=z9hG4bK43efe1d7
    From: "asterisk" <sip:asterisk@128.9.0.39>;tag=as39d40d19
    To: <sip:42.7.11.194>
    Contact: <sip:asterisk@128.9.0.39>
    Call-ID:
2007 Jan 13
3
Permission denied by op
i am invoking op from a python proggy which does an op.system() of
   op chmod 640 /usr/local/etc/tac_plus.conf
i get "Permission denied by op" 
% ls -l /usr/local/etc/op.access
-r--------  1 root  wheel  149 Jan 13 07:41 /usr/local/etc/op.access
% cat /usr/local/etc/op.access
# 2007.01.13
#
#DEFAULT users=src
#
chown   /usr/sbin/chown $* ; users=src
chmod   /bin/chmod $* ; users=src
2003 Sep 08
4
is one of my hosts a scanner?
so i just found that one of my hosts is GENERATING these probe
pairs, maybe every minute or two (note the sequence numbers):
seq     my host                       victim(s)
---     ----------------              ---------------
24)     192.168.0.2:1121    <-->      216.52.3.2:2703 
25)     192.168.0.2:1122    <-->      216.52.3.4:2703 
39)     192.168.0.2:1124    <-->     
2004 May 19
1
avoiding rtp triangle
so, is it safe to put
   canreinvite=yes
on a 7960?  on a 1750?  on a spa-x000?  an xten?
how the heck do i find out other than the hard way?
randy
--
ps: pun intended
2004 Sep 28
1
too many ex-(boy|girl)friends
instead of
   exten => 42/1,1,GoTo(hell,s,1)
   exten => 42/42,1,GoTo(hell,s,1)
   exten => 42/666,1,GoTo(hell,s,1)
   exten => 42/69,1,GoTo(hell,s,1)
i would like to do something like
    exten => 42/(1|42|666|69),1,GoTo(hell,s,1)
or better use a variable
   [global]
   poofs => (1|42|666|69)
   [foo]
   exten => 42/${poofs},1,GoTo(hell,s,1)
i keep circling the wiki