similar to: H.323 Seg faulting

Can anybody recommend a good web interface for asterisk that actually works. I am looking for a web interface that can show how many callers are on the phone, should be able to transfer the calls and disconnect. I have tried using the flash operator but has been unsuccessful in making it work. thanks -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com

In the greatest tradition of Next > Next > Next > Next > Next > Next, the Xiph.Org Foundation releases an Installer for the Xiph Quicktime Components under Windows. Before I upload it to //xiph.org I would appreciate if someone would test it for me. The implementation is simple, and I did test it, but better safe than sorry. //saoshyant.paramnesiac.net/temp/XiphQT.exe That's

In the greatest tradition of Next > Next > Next > Next > Next > Next, the Xiph.Org Foundation releases an Installer for the Xiph Quicktime Components under Windows. Before I upload it to //xiph.org I would appreciate if someone would test it for me. The implementation is simple, and I did test it, but better safe than sorry. //saoshyant.paramnesiac.net/temp/XiphQT.exe That's

In the greatest tradition of Next > Next > Next > Next > Next > Next, the Xiph.Org Foundation releases an Installer for the Xiph Quicktime Components under Windows. Before I upload it to //xiph.org I would appreciate if someone would test it for me. The implementation is simple, and I did test it, but better safe than sorry. //saoshyant.paramnesiac.net/temp/XiphQT.exe That's

On 21/07/2007 23:51:28, Chris Lattner (sabre at nondot.org) wrote: > Evan's solution is the right one. However, your code is valid, so it > shouldn't > crash. I think it dies because linux does not guarantee that > the stack is 16 byte aligned, and the vector operations expect this. The > code generator should compensate and dynamically align the stack on entry >

EvilPenguin schrieb: > > I installed wine today according to the Linux Half-Life HOWTO (guess > what I was going to use it for?). The configuration and building > reported no errors, but when i went to run the install program (for HL), > I got the following error: > > evilpenguin@paladin:~$wine Setup.exe > FIXME:pthread_rwlock_rdlock > FIXME:pthread_rwlock_unlock >

All, I had updated to 1.2.4 right when it came out. I had been working just fine. Today I seem to be having recuring seg faults. can explain it. How can I find why? Anyone else experiencing this? I am running (2) TDM04B cards (has been working since 1.0.9) I have a handfull of UIP200 phones and 1 cisco 7960. I have a unused broadvoic connection that I commented out the registration statement

Everything on Centos 7 seems fine - except - my program. I am trying to compile and run on centos 7. Everything compiles/runs on C6, the executable from C6 runs on C7. when I compile and run on C7 - I get a SEG fault. when I debug: gdb program break main run I get a seg fault at or before main What might I be looking for in this case? Thanks, Jerry

On 06/05/2015 04:18 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: > when I debug: > gdb program > break main > run > I get a seg fault at or before main > > What might I be looking for in this case? Even if it segfaults before main(), you should be able to examine the stack to see what's going on. Beyond that, any advice we give you would be blind guessing. My blind guess would be a symbol

Thanks for the suggestions. My case ended up being a large local variable (stack data)that was fine before and not fine on CentOS 7. If found it by #ifdef entire main function, my program then ran. I then just started letting in chunks of code to narrow it down. jerry

I am running * in a development environment, adding functionality as I go. The * box has a X100P card in it which ztcfg enabled as channel 1 with fxsks signalling (fxsks=1). Everything worked fine and I was able to make inbound and outbound calls to/from the PSTN, the only issue being that some exchanges wouldn't handle the dtmf signalling, but I put that down to a peculiarity with some AU

Hi, I''m using ferret and running into troubles with it seg faulting during searches. The index I''m searching is static and is only updated in an offline way once every couple weeks. The segfault isn''t deterministically reproducible, but if I hammer ferret hard enough I can reliably get it to crash. The problem seems to have something to do with how memory is shared

I have a instance of Asterisk 1.2.14 that is being run from safe_asterisk. Asterisk is seg faulting and NOT generating a core dump. Why would that be? How can I make it dump core? Is there a setting in the safe_asterisk script that I am missing? Thanks, Doug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hey, Ferret is repeatedly seg-faulting my mongrel servers on the same line: /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ferret-0.10.11/lib/ferret/index.rb:718: [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby 1.8.5 (2006-08-25) [i686-linux] I''m using ferret 0.10.11. I haven''t had the time to dig into yet, it''s on the backburner right now - I just keep several spare servers and restart them

I am fairly confident that these issues are related to killing the scriptindex process ungracefully causing blocks that were queued for writing to disk to not get written. I mention to send you the file because it could be that you would see almost immediately with the situation is. Thanks > ----- Original Message ----- > From: oscaruser@programmer.net > To:

Hi Chuck! On Jul 20, 2007, at 11:36 AM, Chuck Rose III wrote: > Hola LLVMers, > > > > I’m looking to make use of the vectorization primitives in the > Intel chip with the code we generate from LLVM and so I’ve started > experimenting with it. What is the state of the machine code > generated for vectors? In my tinkering, I seem to be getting some > wonky

I am fairly certain this is right. Chuck, can you do a quick experiment for me? Go back to your original code but make sure the alloca instruction specify 16-byte alignment. The code should work. If not, please file a bug. Thanks, Evan On Jul 24, 2007, at 1:58 PM, Evan Cheng wrote: > Hrm. This problem shouldn't be target specific. I am pretty sure > prologue / epilogue inserter

On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Chuck Rose III wrote: > I'm looking to make use of the vectorization primitives in the Intel > chip with the code we generate from LLVM and so I've started > experimenting with it. What is the state of the machine code generated > for vectors? In my tinkering, I seem to be getting some wonky machine > instructions, but I'm most likely just doing

Hrm. This problem shouldn't be target specific. I am pretty sure prologue / epilogue inserter aligns stack correctly if there are stack objects with greater than default stack alignment requirement. Seems to be the initial alloca() instruction should specify 16 byte alignment? Evan On Jul 21, 2007, at 2:51 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Chuck Rose III wrote:

You have to run ./tools/wineinstall as a normal user, not root. Ivan.