similar to: WANTED: Toll-Free gateways in Europe/Asia/Africa/South America

The freenum.org beta continues to roll forward. If you have an Asterisk or SER SIP gateway/proxy, please see if you can make some sense of the examples below and install them in your system. Your users will hopefully be able to dial toll free numbers in various nations just like they dial regular numbers in those same country codes. I'd like to get some additional people trying to make

Here's a segment of my dialplan, I'm working on the freenum/ISN functionality: same => n,Set(isnresult=${ENUMLOOKUP(${EXTEN},sip,,1,freenum.org)}) same => n,GotoIf($["${isnresult}" != ""]?:fn-CONGESTION,1) ; set up our outgoing call state same => n,Set(SIPFROMUSER=${CALLERID(num)}) same => n,GotoIf($["${GLOBAL(FREENUMDOMAIN)}" ==

I'm running into errors when using Enum lately. I can't figure out what the problem might be as I've had Enum up and running in the past. I'm running the latest CVS-Head compiled version. I've also tried using the new Enum function with the same results. When doing a lookup on a number that exists in the enum server I get the following results: -- Executing

Since e164.org added DNC and ADDRESS records my enum configuration has failed. Using both the old EnumLookup app and the new ENUMLOOKUP function, the lookups have consistantly failed since e164.org added E2U+ADDRESS and E2U+DNC records. Mar 6 17:39:44 WARNING[14222]: enum.c:235 parse_naptr: NAPTR Regex match failed. Mar 6 17:39:44 WARNING[14222]: enum.c:354 enum_callback: Failed to parse naptr

Hi, I've two yocto questions about the syntax of dialplan: 1. What's the "official" notation of each line: "=>" or "=" ? In the wiki of Asterisk, I see very often "=>", however, what's the reason for both syntaxes authorized ? Historical ? 2. To write info in logs/console, you have two commands: NoOp and Verbose. Verbose seems to be

I'm setting up a private enum zone to simplify/centralize dialplans for a number of Asterisk servers. In several dialed number situations, there are a handful of possible destinations for the call, and I'd like to have * try ENUMENTRY1, ENUMENTRY2, .., ENUMENTRYN just in case the first result is temporarily unable to handle the call. In at least some cases, I'd also like the order in

Does anyone have a better ENUM lookup handler than the built-in ENUMLOOKUP() function? The built-in function does not properly handle multiple return values such as: 8.9.9.3.2.8.8.6.6.8.1.e164.org has NAPTR record 200 10 "u" "E2U+SIP" "!^\\+1866(.*)$!sip:1866\\1 at tollfree.sip-happens.com!" . 8.9.9.3.2.8.8.6.6.8.1.e164.org has NAPTR record 200 10 "u"

On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Ludovic Gasc wrote: > 1. What's the "official" notation of each line: "=>" or "=" ? In the > wiki of Asterisk, I see very often "=>", however, what's the reason for > both syntaxes authorized ? Historical ? I'm not 'official,' but I have a strong preference for just '=.' Using

Hi all, In my server dialplan, it first tries to dial possible SIP URI contacts returned by DNS lookups using the ENUMLOOKUP function; it only sends calls to PSTN when there aren't any NAPTR records of the dialed number. Problem arises when my Internet connection is down to some locations, which inhibits my Asterisk server to reach the DNS servers to do those lookups. In those cases, calls

Hi all, Does ENUMLOOKUP can query multiple DNS servers without having to replicate the same code in which the only thing replaced is the server? If I use ENUMLOOKUP(${exten}), Asterisk will parse enum.conf file to find the list of DNS servers in order of preference to be queried, but, I pretend to use something like this: ${ENUMLOOKUP(+${ARG1:2:},sip,c) which does not seam to care about

Hello all you Gurus out there! Please could you explain something to me: Currently I try to get ENUMLOOKUP() working. Naturally I do all the testing with my own number. I registered my number at e164.org I paid for registration of my number at a registration agent for e164.arpa (I know, I don't need both. I just did the .arpa registration first and later discoverd the free .org service....)

2015-06-26 17:11 GMT+02:00 Steve Edwards <asterisk.org at sedwards.com>: > On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Ludovic Gasc wrote: > > 1. What's the "official" notation of each line: "=>" or "=" ? In the wiki >> of Asterisk, I see very often "=>", however, what's the reason for both >> syntaxes authorized ? Historical ? >>

I would like to implement enum lookup in my dial plan but searching for solution / implementation I'm getting confused what is current standard. On some pages I read that the ENUMLOOKUP is not in development anymore and suggesting on using Enumlookup.agi scrip , some are saying that Asterisk 1.2.0 comes with a new powerful ENUMLOOKUP. So there is probably no need to use this script anymore;

Hi All, For a 1.4 version asterisk, whats the recommended mechanism for dialling with ENUM lookup? At the moment I user SIPbroker, but am getting tired of it hanging on certain numbers, so I was thinking about implementing it myself. I've seen various vo-ip.info pages (http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+cmd+EnumLookup) talking about the func ENUMLOOKUP instead of EnumLookup

ENUM lookups at e164.org return a IP route for ALL toll-free numbers. I was surprised to observe that ALL toll-free numbers get a hit at e164.org. It appears that ALL toll-free prefixes have been delegated, thereby publishing an IP route for YOUR TOLL-FREE NUMBERS, my toll-free numbers, and even toll-free numbers that have not been allocated. :-) See below Should I care? Even though this

I am working on getting freenum.org ISN/ITAD numbers integrated into my exiting dialplan however I am having trouble getting the extension matches to work "as expected." I would like to be able to do something like: exten => _X.*.,1,Macro(isn-outbound...) Where I would expect that any extension that starts with at least one number, but includes a literal "*" followed by

I'm helping with an article in "New Scientist" on the use of ISN (http://www.freenum.org/) and the reporter with whom I'm working is trying to get some quotes from users of "normal" ENUM services (e164.arpa, please) from a telco perspective as a comparative basis. If you run an SS7 interconnected telephone switching system that incorporates VoIP via ENUM (hopefully

In several places online, and in the Asterisk F.O.T. book, there is a warning against using '_.' saying: "[it] should probably never be used". However, the need often arises act on numeric extensions that begin with *'s and #'s, and '+', and of course _X. does not match I have tried exten => _[0-9*#+]. but that seems to be the functional equivalent to _X.

Hi, I use Asterisk 1.2.17 in my site, and now I'm trying to configure ENUM lookup in my server. When someone calls a number that has multiple ENUM entries, randomly Asterisk seems to fail to return a correct answer, and dial by ENUM fails. I've goggled a bit on this, but didn't get any good conclusion. There is some RFC Compliant ENUM Macro that can be used that is announced

Ok, so you've read the Wiki and gotten call routing using ENUM to work (http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20E164%20Call%20Routing) with your own ENUM-alike domain, e164.example.com. But how do you populate it with data? You can do it manually, but that gets very tedious very quickly. Or you can use the nifty DDNS updating program that comes with bind9. The first thing is