similar to: S-ata controller

Dear Soeren, a couple of months ago, namely > revision 1.8 > date: 2003/05/01 06:20:50; author: sos; state: Exp; lines: +17 -2 > I'm pleased to announce that Promise is now supporting the FreeBSD > project by providing documentation (under NDA) and hardware for > testing. This commit is the first result of the cooperation, and > adds support for several of their new

Hiya, Is there any reason (and anything to worry about) if disk target IDs don''t start at 0 (zero). For some reason mine are like this (3 controllers - 1 onboard and 2 PCIe); AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: 0. c8t0d0 <ATA -ST9160314AS -SDM1 cyl 19454 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> /pci at 0,0/pci10de,cb84 at 5/disk at 0,0 1. c8t1d0 <ATA -ST9160314AS -SDM1

Hello. I would like to know if promise RAID cards are compatible with CentOS / RHEL ? I have seen that only SATA is supported on the RHEL hardware compatibility list. The other ATA raid cards seems not to be compatible. They give source code and promise grants compatibility with RedHat 8 and 9 but not RHEL. I would like to know if somebody tried a ATA raid card like Fasttrack TX2000, SX4000,

We're using a storage solution involving two SunFire X4500 servers using DRBD to replicate a 15TB partition across the network with ocfs2 on top. We're sharing the partition from one server over NFS and the other is mounted read-only at present. The DBRD backing store is software RAID 60 on 40 disks. We've been seeing periodic issues whereby our NFS clients (Debian Lenny) are very

Dear Everybody, I am telling you the whole story, perhaps you can give me a better idea. Almost 3 years ago I purchased Arima HDAMA rev. G motherboard with integrated Silicon Image Sil3114 Serial ATA 4 Ports SATA I adapter. ( http://www.arimacorp.com/ViewProduct.asp?View=86 ) . BIOS version is 2.13. My intention is to make a file server, using linux software raid, so I bought 2 new shiny 1TB

Hi, With the pcibackend feature of Xen 3.0.2, I pass a S-ATA card to a domU. This card is recognized with the sata_uli module but not the disk. # lspci 0000:02:09.0 Mass storage controller: ALi Corporation ALi M5281 Serial ATA / RAID Host Controller (rev a1) # modprobe sata_uli sata_uli 0000:02:09.0: version 0.5 ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xC800 ctl 0xC402 bmdma 0xB400 irq 16 ata4: SATA max

I''ve been trying to get either smartctl or sg3_utils to report properly. They both have the same low-level problems which leads me to suspect either I''m doing something wrong OR there is a problem in the marvell88sx / sd / SATA etc framework. I can access drive name/serial number of all drives on the SAT2 card and the temperature is returned from the IE log page on my two

From: Harald Finn?s > You seem to know what you're talking about, Seems v. Knows is a whole new ballgame. But I have been deploying SCSI on Linux since 1993 (Advansys, now owned by LSI, was the first vendor to formally support Linux), SCSI RAID on Linux since 1997 (large ICP-Vortex), through 3Ware's original FPGA ASIC designs in the AccelATA and Escalade 5000 series in 1999+. For a

Hello friends, I'm having a problem with my home server (ASUS A7V133 motherboard) which has a horrible performance with ATA disks connected to an integrated promise controller. Below you can see iozone results of the same disk connected to the primary/ secondary controller versus the promise one. Promise ATA100 controller: ========================= Version 1.02a ------Sequential

I'm trying to install 4.8 from cdrom. I get to the kernel config menu, select the first option, install without configuring a kernel, and the boot process hangs accessing the cdrom. ad0 (the hard drive) is recognized fine. The cdrom does: acd0: MODE_SENSE_BIG command timeout - resetting ata1: resetting devices .. done over and over. Finally I get to the screen "Probing devices, please

Hi All, I'm about to clean and re-initialize a Maxtor 160GB disk that shows a weird problem but I think I've found a bug in RELENG_4_7 somewhere so if preserving my disk can help conquer one more bug I'm happy to wait a couple of days and help solve that bug. Here's the story: While upgrading from 4.3-STABLE to 4.7p4 and at the same time reorganizing my vinum volumes I copied

Marcel Moolenaar wrote am 17.03.2008 17:28 (localtime): > > On Mar 17, 2008, at 3:33 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> phk 2008-03-17 10:33:23 UTC >> >> FreeBSD src repository >> >> Modified files: >> sys/sys ata.h >> sbin/atacontrol atacontrol.8 atacontrol.c >> sys/dev/ata ata-all.c ata-all.h

Hi people, I am building a cheap remote rsync backup server using a software raid 5 array of 4 500GB disks. What I have available on the market is: 1. HITACHI GST Deskstar T7K500 500GB 7200rpm 16MB cache Serial ATA II-300 2. SEAGATE Barracuda 7200.10 with NCQ 500GB 7200rpm 16MB cache Serial ATA II-300 3. Western Digital 500GB SATAII RAID EDITION Caviar SE16 7200rpm 8.9ms 16MB cache I am

Hello all, I am new to this list and hope that my mail is not OFF TOPIC. After looking around for 2 months now, to find a solution, I will try it here now. Now the scenario: I bought a new cool dell laptop: INSPIRON 8100, 512MB RAM, NVIDEA GeForce2Go 32MB, 30GB Hitachi hard disk and a DVD. I bought it with WinME preinstalled, because it wasn't possible to get it with linux nor without an

hello again, i've reported a problem with the intel scb2 ata board and syslinux a few days ago. now i've more details: the scb2 ata board has an onboard promise raid controller. when the option bios of this ide raid controller is disabled syslinux works fine - but if the option bios is enabled (which has to be if i want to boot form the harddisk) the boot of the fails (kernel version:

Hi All, I'm writing to announce a workaround to the problem with various Promise ATA RAID controllers, discussed previously on this list and mentioned on http://syslinux.zytor.com/hardware.php. To recap, the Promise BIOS overwrites random locations in low memory, whether booting from it or not. This screws with PXELINUX. In our case, we got around the problem by disabling the Promise BIOS

For all thos Asterisk users not on the FWD list, it works for me!: -----Original Message----- From: Free World Dialup - The Future of Dialing [mailto:FWD@LISTSERV.PULVER.COM] On Behalf Of Leonidas Piagkos Sent: donderdag 12 juni 2003 0:58 To: FWD@LISTSERV.PULVER.COM Subject: Re: [FWD] FWD losing Registration Hi Don, All you have to do with your ATA is to set the following parameters as :

I see that there's now a 2.16.1 upgrade path for Cisco ATA-186 devices, dated (variously) July 11 or July 14 2003. Here are some interesting bugs that claim to be fixed. Most notable is CSCeb17953, at least from my perspective, as I've hit this bug before. CSCea42480 The Cisco ATA ignores the Require:100rel header and processes call. CSCea69889 The Cisco ATA builds a 302 Moved

Hello list, i am using: asterisk CVS-10/13/03-11:54:33 chan_capi-0.3.0 ATA-186 V2.16.1.ms over MGCP Situation: ISDN calls ATA ISDN speaks with ATA ATA-Phone presses Flash and speaks to another one (SIP/snom200) ATA-Phone hangs up ISDN talks to SIP/snom200 snom200 hangs up The incoming extension of ATA keeps busy for a time (20 sec?), even its not off-hook anymore! Any ideas? -- Swapping

Hi All, I have a GSM box, which needs to connect to a analogue phone line. I've plugged the GSM box to a Grandstream ATA (386). This ATA has extension number 600. Now what I want to accomplish is the following: - If a mobile-number is chosen by a user, asterisk needs to call the ATA (600), wait for a few seconds, and then send the mobile-phonenumber. Or, if it's possible, define the