similar to: 486 Busy message - SNOM 200

Hi folks, in order to establish backward compatibility we made an image that automatically detects if the other side does not support RFC3264. Please try it out, we would be very interested if this image is a progress! http://snom.com/download/share/snom200-2.03b-SIP.bin Thanks, CS

As a follow up to my earlier posting, the problem with the Snom 200 Busy signal was the firmware! I reverted back to 1.16x and everything's OK. That made today pretty complicated, since I already had a new kernel and a new Asterisk build I was trying all at once.... Hopefully someone else will benefit... - Matt

I have 2 Snom 200 and would like to get them to work properly with Asterisk. With the Firmware 2.02t I am able to use the phone. But only one line configured. With there newer firmware 2.03o it will not allow me to make calls. But I can get calls on the unit. Again the 2nd line is not able to be registered. Is this an issue with Asterisk or Snom? I could use some example configuration

On 15.4.2019 3.33, Larry Rosenman via dovecot wrote: > ?72% [ler at thebighonker.lerctr.org:~] $ doveadm search mailbox > lists/freebsd/ports-commiters? body 'sysutils' > [ler at thebighonker.lerctr.org:~] $ doveadm fts rescan > [ler at thebighonker.lerctr.org:~] $ doveadm index -q > lists/freebsd/ports-commiters > ?64% [ler at thebighonker.lerctr.org:~] $ tail -f

On 15/04/2019 08:09, Larry Rosenman via dovecot wrote: > Note the hits after the fts rescan/index. > > Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/ghei36> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> > *Sent:* Monday, April 15, 2019 12:55:07 AM > *To:* Larry Rosenman; John Fawcett

On 15/04/2019 10:31, Larry Rosenman via dovecot wrote: > It always shows the autoindex. And yes built from sources.? I'm the > FreeBSD port maintainer for mail/docecot.? This has been happening for > several releases. > > Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/ghei36> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* dovecot

On 15/04/2019 01:39, Larry Rosenman via dovecot wrote: > > full solr.log at: > https://www.lerctr.org/~ler/solr.log > > The search DOES make it to SOLR: > ?77% [ler at thebighonker.lerctr.org:~] 130 $ grep sysutils > /var/log/solr/solr.log > 2019-04-14 18:31:34.749 INFO? (qtp349420578-7538) [? ?x:dovecot] > o.a.s.c.S.Request [dovecot]? webapp=/solr path=/select >

Hi all! I updated my snom200 to 2.02t and now MOH from * don?t works anymore... only the MOH from snom server and if i clear the MOH server field in the phone i have no MOH at all..( with the transfer button, moh plays using a extension). Someone with that problem? I downgrade to 2.01s but nothing changes. Miklos -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi I am setting up an Asterisk System in an office environment, Incoming and Outgoing calls are working ok, but i am having a few strange problems regarding call waiting. With the SNOM 200 (firmware 2.02t) phones, if you are on a call and a 2nd call comes in, the call waiting beep is played and the light flashes, but if you hang up the 1st call, instead of the phone ringing, it connects the

With a recent update to Asterisk CVS, and versions 2.02r and t of the Snom 200 firmware, I'm getting the Snom phones stuck reporting "Busy.": -- Got SIP response 486 "Busy Here" back from 10.12.34.248 -- SIP/3064-b07d is busy They're on-hook, not doing anything. They are registered fine. I can pick them up and call out over Zap or IAX fine. I just

I'm using the SNOM 200 latest SIP beta (so that I can have the GSM codec, etc). Everything seems to be working fine, but the music on hold doesn't play when I use the HOLD button on the snom. Any suggestions? Thanks, --Ernest

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040106/dd10d5ef/attachment.htm -------------- next part -------------- Hello Today I observed this strange problem, as soon as I called from my SNOM IP phone (910) to CISCO IP Phone 7905G (810), I got following warning messages and call didn't connect. But after couple of minutes this

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040729/4cfa3258/attachment.htm -------------- next part -------------- ? Hi all, I would like to study the asterisk source code(Program). I dont' know from which file i've to start reading the code. can anyone helpme. Regards Shan.

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040810/16371a21/attachment.htm -------------- next part -------------- ? Hi, I'm using TE410P card with four T1 lines. I've configured all the channels in my /etc/zaptel.conf file. In zttool i'm getting "OK" for the "Span-1" but the other three spans giving

I recently got an e-mail from Christian at SNOM saying that he's fixed GSM in the snom. Can anyone confirm that? Mark

Looks like this phone has redirection or DND set. Anything on the display? If it still a mystery send us the settings of the phone, then it should become clear. BTW if you have a snom trouble ticket, you can also go to http://www.snom.com/onlinesupport.html (scroll down to set up an account). CS > -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com >

I have a Snom 190 that refuses to accept calls after upgrade to firmware 3.60s, latest. I get "SIP 486/Busy Here". No change in the dialplan, nor settings in the phone. Calls out fine. I did 30 other phones yesterday with 3.60s with no problem, this is the only one. In the phone's log I get: [5]22/9/2005 17:01:00: timeout::callback: Registering with timeout of 0 ms [5]22/9/2005

AHA! # 1 is the case! Seems the user was fooling around with the phone after the firmware upgrade. Shame that that setting couldn't be locked out. Thanks to Mr Tahir and Mr Stredicke for their spot on responses. -----Original Message----- From: Usman Tahir [mailto:Usman.Tahir@snom.de] Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 12:34 AM To: ColinA@landmarkmasterbuilder.com Cc:

Hi, I have more or less decided to do with the SNOM phones for the next stage of testing with Asterisk becasue they seem to be the best value for money and have support for the GSM codec and easy upgrades.. But now I have to decied wheather to get the 100 or 200 and if its the 200 then I need to have some justification for the extra cost.. Can someone who knows these 2 phones tell me what the

The following error messages were observed in /var/log/asterisk/messages: Sep 22 10:26:42 NOTICE[1133735216]: File chan_sip.c, Line 5099 (handle_request): Unknown SIP command 'PUBLISH' from '212.23.220.236' Sep 22 11:32:50 WARNING[1133735216]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4519 (handle_response ): Got 200 OK on REGISTER that isn't a register The phone was a Snom 200 running v2.01t