similar to: MeetMe: Zap channels don't ever disconnect. . .

As far as I can tell, after discussing this matter with other asterisk users in my area, my telco _does_ provide disconnect supervision.. It seems that the problem is actually related to the Sangoma A200 card I'm using, as two other people both using this same card have expressed the same problem.. Are there any other users on this list using the Sangoma A200 FXO port card, and experiencing

> > > > I would be grateful if anybody could tell me what I should > > tell Verizon > > in NJ so they would enable "disconnect supervision" for my lines. > > > > Apparently "remote hangup notification" or "disconnect > supervision" or > > "calling party control" is NOT the magic phrase for them. Although >

Hey all, anyone know the status of disconnect supervision on POTS lines in India? Set up an asterisk box, TDM cards, in Mumbai, and doesn't seem to have disconnect supervision...... Thanks -- Chris Earle System Solutions Specialist

I'm starting to shop for my first channel bank and one of the features that eveyone seems to recommend is "far end disconnect supervision". What other terms do various manufactures use to describe this same feature ? Is "calling party disconnect" the same as "far end disconnect supervision" ? Thanks

Hi all I'm using sangoma a200 cards in the UK and have the ongoing, often noted problem of disconnect supervision with BT POTS lines. Just noticed this post on http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/UK+Asterisk+Details stating that potentially someone's got a solution : "TDM400P & Not Detecting Hangups: Got a TDM400P installed and having problems with Asterisk not detecting

Does anyone have disconnect supervision working on their TDM400P or X101P cards (to/from the telco)? Googling "telco disconnect supervision," I found the following description: http://mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/telecom-archives/TELECOM_Digest_Online/1559.html [cut] Re: How Do I Get "Kewlstart" From my Phone Company? Paul A Lee Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:58:16 -0400 ... It

Ok so this is officially driving me crazy. I have an Asterisk 1.6.1.6 install with DAHDI/DAHDI tools (latest) and an OpenVOX TDM400 card with 1 FXO port and 1 FXS port. I have a POTS line from my phone company attached to the POTS line. I have asked for "disconnect supervision" to be provisioned on my line and they claim to have added it. However, my scenario is as follows: I receive a

When someone calls into our asterisk server over a PSTN line, dials an extension and then hangs up, the SIP phone related to the given extension will ring about 4 or 5 times before asterisk shows that the channel has been hung up in the console. This isn't such a big deal on its own, but what's happening now is that if a user calls in from a PSTN line, gets voicemail on the extension, and

Thanks for the reply. Forgive me for being na?ve, however have jumped in to this asterisk project at work due to some circumstances beyond my control and I don't know a lot about carriers and how this all works. I am figuring it out, but it's a lot of trial by fire. As far as I know, we only use 1 carrier for our system. We have a PRI from NuVox and we use 7 channels for our asterisk

Hello Everyone, We are looking to interconnect with a local ILEC over an OC-n transport layer. They basically gave us two options in terms of mapping the SONET to the DS3: * VT1.5s mapping * DS1s mapping The second option is quite clear. We would MUX the connection, and plug the lines into qaud t1 cads etc... The tech mentioned that with the second option we would also need a DACS to convert

The FXO lines on my TDM400 are connected to PSTN lines in Israel. As far as I know, the lines around here have disconnect supervision (I've seen some other Israelis on this list, anyone know for sure?), because it's worked on Dialogic cards, which reported hangup, not busy detect (while when I connect a Dialogic card to a PBX, I have to measure the busy signal's frequency/cadence or

Can anyone help me with the term that SBC uses to refer to disconnect supervision? I have an Adit 600 channel bank which has helped improve the disconnect detection time down to about 8 seconds. This is still causing some issues in particular with call progress enabled in * we are having a few disconnects while calls are in session (about 2 reported in first 5 days of use). I have talked both to

Asterisk 1.0.6-BRIstuffed-0.2.0-RC7k is installed I have a x100p card and it doesn't detect a hangup from the calling party when going in voicemail(). My PSTN provider is sending open loop disconnect (voltage decrease for a given moment of time). Actually Progress Detection is HIGHLY EXPERIMENTAL so it should not be required to fix this problem. I wonder if disconnect supervision is the

so i have been running v1-0 on all of my test boxes for about a month now testing iax/sip/res_xxx. I decided to put it into production so I updated a box that was running 0.9.? that had been working perfectly for months and low and behold the inbound line from telco now intermittantly doesn't clear and none of the other channels can dial out on that line. I have tested the line in this

Sorry for the off-topic, but perhaps this will be of interest to other asterisk based ITSPs. We are starting service in a rural area where the ILEC has the rural "monopoly". From what we have read in the FCC docs this does NOT exempt them from number portability, but what does it take for us to qualify to receive their numbers? To date we simply have a few voice trunks to them,

Does anyone know if it is possible to use the following disconnect tone setting with an x100p card? Disconnect Tone: 350@-19,440@-19;4(.25/.25/1+2) This tone was written for a Sipura SPA-3000 for a Panasonic KX-TD1232. The Panasonic does not support disconnect supervision, so this tone is the only thing that will detect a disconnect. It is not a standard fast busy or offhook tone.

I'm attempting to use an asterisk box with a Digium TDM01B as voicemail for an existing Meridian/Norstar PBX with an ATA-2 adapter. We're having problems where hangup is not always (but sometimes) detected. It's not detected probably 70% of the time or more. (The users transfer callers to an extension--caller then has to navigate a menu to get to the appropriate user). After

> Watch the output of 'pri debug span 1' on the Asterisk server while > placing the call - bug #4468 (http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=4468) > might be relevant. Yes, this is exactly what is happening. Thanks a lot. I am thinking about adding a special case for the IBM 800 number since it is the only one my company is complaining about. Currently I have this in my dialplan:

Dear all, I have an FX0 card installed in * and connected to a PBX. Calling works ok ( both in bound /out bound) but after the call, I have to press the '#' key to terminate the call, otherwise the line stays busy. Anybody has a fix for that? Thank you. Anthony

Hi, I have a legacy Norstar system that I'm looking into integrating with my Asterisk setup. My first attempts have worked, which involves a Wildcard X100P FXO card in the * box connected to the Internal ATA (FXS port) on the Norstar system. Calling from SIP -> Norstar works fine, since the SIP caller initiated the call and generally will be sane enough to hangup the phone when