similar to: Mailing list email masquerading.

Please disregard previous posting. My mail client is nuts .. Thanks, Alexander -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Asterisk online forums Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 7:48 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Mailing list email masquerading. Why mailing

Hello all, Last couple weeks we had a lot of business discussions on mailing list, however some people don't like it, some people don't needed it, etc. I had couple discussions with Asterisk community members, who is interested to have business discussions about Asterisk, including but not limited to : business implementations, reselling , Asterisk commercial packages, IP phones,

Hello all, Our Asterisk unofficial online forums (http://asterisk.xvoip.com) are moving forward and are alive. Thanks to all Asterisk guru's who helped to achieve it. Everyday more and more new members are joining this community, however not everyone is using mailing list or knows how to use IRC, this is why they are coming to web-based forums. We believe that together with Digiums

well, asterisk unofficial forums are online since Nov 2003. http://asterisk.xvoip.com We have 500 registered members as of today and forum is alive. About 1000 uniqe visitors are hiting forum everyday. We will post link to your forums to provide users with more info. http://asterisk.xvoip.com I agree, the Wiki is Step #1 for any Asterisk user. The Wiki is a great reference, but you

Re: Per the discussions about spam on this list. Sending a confirming message to an unregistered poster is not a good idea. The return/reply-to addresses in spam is forged, and that is just adding to some victims e-mail. Filtering runs the risk that a legitimate message gets lost, and the sender does not realize it. Filtering is also the most expensive and innefficient way to deal with

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > I stated pure observation on at least two pairs of primary - backup MX I > maintain. Still I made backup MXes with greylisting as well (they are > separately hit by same bad spammers scripts, at a rate about 10 times > smaller than primary MXes are and absolutely independently). I think

Hi, This topic has come up previously, across the R e-mail lists and the spammers need not be subscribers (but could be), but simply reasonably competent HTML scrapers. If you look at the online archives of the R lists, for example R-Devel for this month: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2016-December/thread.html <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2016-December/thread.html>

Did anyone here use the * forums over at asterisk.xvoip.com? I've been unable to connect for a few days now and was wondering if anyone knew if they're down for good. It'd be a shame if they are since * newbs like me need every resource we can find. Joel Moore

I get two or three of these a day. They are not from Gmail but have a "reply to" address that is a Gmail account. The messages cone from an email account that passes SPF and DKIM. So the sender and reply domains differ, but that isn't unique. I have email that I need that arrives like that. I am on the Postfix list where this does belong, but I looked at the problem and decided it

I agree that no action should be taken. It's somewhat mystifying that the robot known as "Amy Kristen" responds so quickly after my post, and with such regularity (so far twice per hour), using perhaps several email addresses - and using the correct "Reply-To" headers. But more mystifying is that she keeps the same name the whole time. And lucky, I guess, because otherwise

On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 05:02:03PM +0800, Plutocrat wrote: > On 11/06/2020 16.26, Marc Roos wrote: > > I know it is not dovecot who should fix this. But anyone using dovecot > > is using an MTA, and receiving spam ;) I know how to look at email > > headers. Spf and dkim is not solving anything here. > > You can configure this sort of thing in postfix, exim etc. The

Hi! Not just an gmail issue. After my last reply I have gotten tons of spams from "Samantha Smith". Keep hitting my "rank as spam"-button in the hope that my MUA could learn :) Best, Kimmo ti, 2018-04-17 kello 19:34 +0000, Ding, Yuan Chun kirjoitti: > No, I do not use gmail, still got dirty spam email twice.? > > -----Original Message----- > From: R-help

On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 09:53 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Thanks a lot! The most difficult part of this I noticed is to make sure > they responded with report of what discovered and which actions were > taken, and if this didn't happen to have the whole block of IPs registered > to them blocked off (at least this is what I am doing where I can). (1) Not all complaints about

On Fri, February 13, 2015 11:52 am, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Valeri Galtsev > <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >> >>> Otherwise it accept junk that your primary rejects >> >> Not exactly. If greylisting on primary is set, but on backup MX is not, >> still what is killed by greylisting by primary MX, almost never

Hello, Nor do I, no gmail, also got spam. Rui Barradas On 4/17/2018 8:34 PM, Ding, Yuan Chun wrote: > No, I do not use gmail, still got dirty spam email twice. > > -----Original Message----- > From: R-help [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Fowler, Mark > Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 12:32 PM > To: Luis Puerto; Peter Langfelder > Cc: R-Help ML

On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Patrick Masotta <masottaus at yahoo.com> wrote: >> As per >> prior discussions, the "From:" field should remain >> with the >> original sender. One (important) >> reason is that frequent participants >> in the >> Syslinux Mailing List tend to use the "From:" >> field, for >> instance

Hello, everyone. I've proven to myself, via throw-away addresses, that individuals and robots sift thru archives and mailing list subscription lists, gathering addresses to sell on CD's to spammers. No list is immune, especially if it or its archives are available over the web. I've been spammed within a very short while of my address appearing on a posted message. If you go to

hi, I am using shorewall 2.0.14 on debian and it is working but for a small problem. I want to allow masquerading only for a few ips in the network to some certain site for ftp, ssh etc. Masquerading will be blocked for other users amd they will access internet thru proxy server. How can I do this ? thanks. wrodrigues. Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.

Seems it must be the R-list. A horde of ?solicitation? emails began arriving about 27 minutes after I posted about not seeing any! Had left work by that time, so did not encounter them until now. From: Mark Leeds [mailto:markleeds2 at gmail.com] Sent: April 18, 2018 12:33 AM To: Rui Barradas Cc: Ding, Yuan Chun; Fowler, Mark; Luis Puerto; Peter Langfelder; R-Help ML R-Project; Neotropical bat

Hi, FYI, I started receiving spam to the email address I use only for this mailing-list, about one week after I posted a couple messages onto it. So the nut mailing-list is definitely used by spammers for email addresses harvesting :-( -- Michel Bouissou <michel at bouissou.net> OpenPGP ID 0xEB04D09C