similar to: Bayonne and Asterisk

Hi, there are still some questions to be answered by OpenSS7.com in order to decide, whether E400P-SS7 is a good choice for the asterisk SS7 support. In the meanwhile I'm also in negotiations with another manufacturer (whose name I currently may not tell due to a NDA) of SS7 hardware, who gets likely persuaded to offer a cheap SS7-PCI-card which would be suitable for asterisk. Asterisk users

Folks, I love Asterisk, have been using it for a while now. I'd like to know if anyone has some good comparison points on Asterisk vs. Vocal (Vovida) vs. GNU Bayonne. I know only a little about the later two. Also, one drawback I've hard about Asterisk (not for me, but for general consumption/deployment) is easy of configuration -- people like GUIs. They want point-n-click. I'm a

Could someone familiar with both break down the most memorable pro's & con's and why you have decided to use Asterisk? Thanks _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

I found an old Dialogic card in an abandoned PC, that I think is a Dialogic D/41EPCI based on some googling.. The lspci output says: 00:09.0 Bridge: PLX Technology, Inc. PCI <-> IOBus Bridge (rev 01) Subsystem: Dialogic Corp: Unknown device 0529 I'm just getting started with Asterisk to build a SOHO system. Any suggestions for what I can do with this card? It would be

Hello, I am very new to Asterisk, so please forgive me for my basic question. I couldn't find a good answer to this on the info boards. I'd like to know if the following is possible and reasonable to accomplish: I'd like to configure a voice recording system using Asterisk and a Tormenta2 Quad T1 card. A co-worker was able to create this system a while back with Bayonne and a

Hi i have an application developed with bayonne. Recentely i'm experiencing some problems and i am planning to migrate to asterisk. I would like to know if i can do these things whit asterisk: - IVR integration with database (mysql, insert,delete,update,select) - TTS - record exploration (for example, check if some resources are available in the database, and list them to the user (via

I was trying to do a little searching to see if there has even been a comparison between Asterisk and VOCAL or any of the other OSS packages? "Practical Voice Over IP using VOCAL" published by O'Reilly and Associates, attempts to make a strong case about how scalable VOCAL. Of course, considering that the book is written by the makers of VOCAL, it tends to have a one sided slant.

ClueCon is coming in 2 weeks so we urge everyone who plans on attending to register today so we get a proper headcount! ClueCon was put together by Asterlink, the same team of people who helped shape Asterisk into what it is today by writing features, fixing bugs, offering IRC support and assisting with the management of the development effort. We have produced several real-world solutions based

Hi, i am in the process of prototyping a small (inter-)network game client that is intented to run on windows. I don't have the time nor desire to create a dedicated linux port of it, but as some users may want to use it on linux, i'd like to know what points could be important to make a win app run as smoothly on wine as possible with little extra effort. Development system will be

Hi Andy, One of the issues that I found not intuitive, is that when an ExecutionEngine is deallocated, the memory manager's destructor is also called. This resulted in having to write two objects in my case, one as a per JIT request memory manager and one global JIT memory manager. The per request JIT memory manager gets memory from the global manager, but both ended up implementing

Hi, I've been running Squid successfully on CentOS 7 (and before that on 6 and 5), and it's always been running nicely. I've been using it mostly as a transparent proxy filter in school networks. So far, I've only been able to filter HTTP. Do any of you do transparent HTTPS filtering ? Any suggestions, advice, caveats, do's and don'ts ? Cheers from the snowy South of

Hi there, Sorry, I don't have the thread history to reply to since I normally read llvmdev through the archives, but wanted to give my .02 of feedback anyway. As far as I understand, this change is wanted because the LLVM infrastructure derives no value from knowing the types, and there's a cost in terms of code spent to support all of it. I've been creating a frontend that mostly

Hi Dirkjan, Are you using JIT or MCJIT? Cheers. ________________________________________ From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] on behalf of Dirkjan Bussink [d.bussink at gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2013 8:18 AM To: Kaylor, Andrew Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Memory clean for applications using LLVM for JIT compilation Hi Andy, One

Thanks for the reply, nice to have some validation. I thought of another approach which might be preferable: generate relocatable code, use a JITEventListener to grab each function and copy it to my own memory, let all the LLVM stuff die normally then use my copy of the code. However when I call setRelocationModel(Reloc::PIC_) on the engine builder I get code that seg faults. The assembly looks

Hello, In Rubinius we're seeing an occasional crash inside LLVM that always happens inside getenv(), which is used for example when creating a MCContext (inside lib/MC/MCContext.cpp, it checks getenv("AS_SECURE_LOG_FILE")). The problem is that getenv() and friends aren't thread safe and Rubinius provides a multithreaded system. We can relatively easily get locking setup around

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Antoine Pitrou <antoine at python.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan <at> ochtman.nl> writes: > > > > As far as I understand, this change is wanted because the LLVM > > infrastructure derives no value from knowing the types, and there's a > > cost in terms of code spent to support all of it.

Hello all, When using the JIT on ARM, I get the following error message. The code works fine on both X86 32 and 64 bit architectures. rbx: /home/dirkjan/llvm-3.3.src/include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineOperand.h:260: unsigned int llvm::MachineOperand::getReg() const: Assertion `isReg() && "This is not a register operand!"' failed. Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.

I'm not sure I see why the delegating memory manager feels wrong to both of you. That's exactly the kind of usage model I would envision for clients that needed to handle multiple ExecutionEngines that had reason to share a memory manager. I'm saying this as an invitation to discussion, not to be argumentative. We certainly could change things if it would make the design better.

... and that's kind of annoying when I'm trying to debug something. Also, it doesn't seem like openssh.org lists the IRC channel (even though it's referenced) anywhere. Cheers, Dirkjan

Hi Dirkjan, > I've tried looking for this error, but can't seem to find any more information on what the cause of this could be. This looks like a backtrace from the legacy JIT. Unfortunately that's known to be broken on ARM and you should use the MCJIT instead (see tools/lli/lli.cpp for an example of how to enable it). We're hoping to get rid of the old one soon, but there