Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "anyone with a used analog card for sale or trade?"
2003 Oct 24
2
asterisk config files
Would anyone mind sending me a working set of config files for asterisk and their softphone settings? I am really looking for very basic setup stuff as I just want to show that the system works to my management before they will allow me to spend the money on phones and a telco card. Server is a redhat 7.3 w/ 512 RAM and dual 550's. Asterisk tar ball has been laid down, configured, make,
2003 Nov 05
6
recording calls
Hello,
You can use ZapBarge as an extension in your dialplan to listen in on
conversations going on in Zap channels(Zaptel device channels)
As for recording you can use the Manager interface command StartMonitor to
start recording of a Zap channel and StopMonitor to stop it.
Zap channels are pretty much the only ones right now that you can directly
monitor and record through Asterisk.
If
2003 Dec 05
0
Budgetone phones
Of the 4 BT-100's I've had 2 where the ethernet ports failed. And another one which finally one day would just refuse to boot. Warranty replacement took care of all of them.
Jonathan Hopper
"Todd Wallace" <twallace_list@touchstonetel.com> wrote ..
> Anyone ever have the Ethernet port on a Budgetone phone quit working.
> For
> some reason, it stopped link'ing
2003 Nov 06
5
FW: recording calls
Sorry that got accidentally sent incompleted, here's the full post:
OK, here is the long drawn out description of how I am using Zap Barge and
Monitor:
Zapbarge(listen in on live calls):
Very simple actually I just added this to my dial plan(extensions.conf):
; barge monitoring extension
exten => 8159,1,ZapBarge
exten => 8159,2,Hangup
Then when you dial 8159 on
2006 Jun 16
0
RailsConf ticket for sale or trade
Hi, everyone,
I have a RailsConf ticket available for sale or trade (your time coding
on one of my projects as an alternative to paying for the ticket. I''ll
also consider paying for airfare, hotel, etc.). The ticket is $400. If
you''re interested in a trade, check out:
http://jennyw.dangerousideas.com/articles/2006/06/16/a-ticket-to-ride-the-rails-to-chicago
Jen
2005 Dec 24
1
best way to design uknown depth of subcategories
Hello,
What would be the best way to design a table of posts that belong to a
unknown depth of categories. Say i wanted to display the posts of data (i.e.,
craigslist) but the category could be something like
NewYork/RealEstate/Housing/ForSale/ByOwner. Would acts_as_tree work best
here and assign each sublevel to a different id? just trying to take the
easiest approach here using the best
2011 Feb 03
3
R Data Manipulation - Transposing Data by a Given Column, Like User_ID
Hello,
I'd like to transpose data to create an analysis-friendly dataframe. See
below for an example, I was unable to use t(x) and I couldn't find a
function with options like PROC TRANSPOSE in SAS.
The ideal solution handles variable quantities of SITE - but beggars can't
be choosers. :-)
Thank you in advance,
Mike
## INPUT DATA
USER_ID<-c(1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,4)
SITE
2004 May 18
1
VoIP Termination w/ 402 or 712 area code?
I realize this is a shot in the dark, but I'm trying to find a VoIP provider
that offers 402 or 712 area code DID numbers. I'm almost completely
convinced that no one offers these area codes (eastern Nebraska, western
Iowa), however considering the wide audience of this mailing list I thought
this would be a good place to ask.
I would prefer a provider that allows for Asterisk use, but I
2008 Sep 24
1
string to numeric question
this seems l ike it shouldn't be that hard but i give up.
if i have a string say, temp<-"01", I want to increase it by 1 so that
it becomes "02". but the following code obviously won't work when the
input string is say "10" because then it gives "011" when I just want
"11". uuugh.
does someone know an easy way ( i guess hard is
2010 Feb 05
0
[LLVMdev] Basic block with two return instructions
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Russell Wallace
<russell.wallace at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah! I didn't know about verifyFunction; it does indeed catch it,
> thanks! I'll leave that call in my code for all cases for the moment,
> should help identify problems like that.
>
> Is there a recommended way to avoid this problem when compiling a
> language that has an
2015 Dec 21
2
Hash of a module
| (canonicalizeOperands swaps arguments of an and and then ReassociateExpression swaps them back).
That feels like its own bug, canonicalize and reassociate having different opinions of canonical order. Just saying.
--paulr
From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Artur Pilipenko via llvm-dev
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 9:11 AM
To: Russell Wallace
Cc: llvm-dev
2013 Aug 26
1
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM 3.3 on Win64
... Or maybe not? I just tried it again in the exact same configuration
that did work before, and this time it fails at an earlier stage with a
different error:
[ 66%] Building CXX object
lib/Target/Mips/CMakeFiles/LLVMMipsCodeGen.dir/Mips16FrameLowering.cpp.obj
Mips16FrameLowering.cpp
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'C:\PROGRA~2\MICROS~2.0\VC\bin\cl.exe' : return
code '0xffffffff'
2007 Dec 16
0
Running default rake tasks?
I installed via piston and when in vendor/plugins/backgroundrb, I
attempt to run the default rake task:
(in /home/wallace/new_bdrb-wheels/vendor/plugins/backgroundrb)
rake aborted!
no such file to load -- spec/rake/spectask
/usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in
`gem_original_require''
/usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `require''
2016 Mar 29
0
JIT compiler and calls to existing functions
Other advantages of keeping things symbolic:
1) You can use function attributes to provide optimization or semantic
information.
2) Linking modules works as expected when one of them contains the
definition.
3) You can get better code generation (i.e. pc relative addressing for
local symbols, etc..)
If the inttoptr scheme makes you happy, go for it. I'm not telling you
its wrong, merely
2016 Mar 29
0
JIT compiler and calls to existing functions
There is no documentation I know of. Rough sketch:
1) Create a subclass of SectionMemoryManager
2) Create an instance of this class and add it the EngineBuilder via
setMCJITMemoryManager
(Make sure everything runs without changes)
3) Override the getSymbolAddress method, have your implementation call
the base classes impl
(Make sure everything runs without changes)
4) Add handling to map
2016 Mar 30
1
JIT compiler and calls to existing functions
We use an explicit relocation step to deal with this. We generate code
into a temporary memory location, then relocate it into a reserved area
of memory which is always within a small relative offset of other
interesting code. This allows us to get pc relative calls.
Philip
On 03/30/2016 05:53 AM, Matt Godbolt wrote:
> For what it's worth we did a similar thing, but
> overrode
2010 Feb 28
3
[LLVMdev] Large integers as first-class values
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Russell Wallace
> <russell.wallace at gmail.com> wrote:
>> What's the largest integer such that something like 'return ((a * b) /
>> c) >> d' works correctly on all major platforms?
>
> Twice the size of a pointer, i.e. 64 bits on
2010 Feb 05
0
[LLVMdev] Basic block with two return instructions
Did your test include running llvm::verifyFunction(...) on the function in question?
I guess I should test this, but I would have thought this would catch the issue.
Garrison
On Feb 5, 2010, at 12:13, Russell Wallace wrote:
> Fair enough. In that case, is there an elegant way to test whether a
> basic block already has a terminator instruction?
>
> (I can think of several ways to
2010 Feb 05
2
[LLVMdev] Basic block with two return instructions
Ah! I didn't know about verifyFunction; it does indeed catch it,
thanks! I'll leave that call in my code for all cases for the moment,
should help identify problems like that.
Is there a recommended way to avoid this problem when compiling a
language that has an explicit and optional return statement?
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Garrison Venn <gvenn.cfe.dev at gmail.com> wrote:
2016 Mar 30
0
JIT compiler and calls to existing functions
Can't the code generator do this opportunistically? That is, generate the
more compact instruction sequence if the address happens to be within four
gigabytes, otherwise generate the longer form?
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Matt Godbolt <matt at godbolt.org> wrote:
> For what it's worth we did a similar thing, but
> overrode RTDyldMemoryManager directly This allowed us