similar to: # of T400Ps in a machine

Are they any issues still with hyperthreading processors, I've read and been told by a few people to make sure its disabled in bios if I want to use * on a hyperthreading machine. Kind Regards, Chris Bond

Hi, Has anyone had success using a TE410P card in an HP-Compaq DL380 G4 server? For me the card is detected fine, but the system just never sees an interrupt from the card. I've tried everything I can think of. The card definitely works. Its Fedora Core, but we also tried a stock 2.6.10 kernel. We tried with and without Hyperthreading, with "noapic", we disabled all the

Hello, I`ve got a problem which I can`t deal with. I own 2 cards - TDM2400P and TE410P. I`ve put them into a HP Proliant DL380 G4 server, compiled the drivers according to the manual. Unfortunetly there are both cards channels are configured in zaptel.conf file the first module (in this file) sends an error. For configuration: span = 1, 1, 0, ccs, hdb3, crc4 fxsks = 21-24 bchan = 25-39,

Hello all, Been a while since I've strolled this way. Apologies in advance if this is a common line of questioning. I've just bought a new Intel 865G based board with a P4 Hyperthreading processor. I believe I've gotten SMP set up correctly: in the menuconfig I specified SMP and told acpi to enumerate processors. Did I leave out anything? Anyway, the dmesg looks good and the

I just tried to install CentOS (x86_64 4.4 and i386 4.3, not both at once, when I found the 64bit version didn't boot, I tried the 32bit version, same result) on a dual Naconda Xeon system. I get an OOPS just after the IDE info is printed on the screen during boot (this is booting off the CD during the install phase). After mucking about with the bios settings (and many reboots later), I

Hi, I have been trying to get Hyperthreading to work in a Windows HVM on Xen 4.1.2 as described in ''xmexample.hvm''. I think I have set it up correctly, but I can''t seem to get it to work. There is not much documentation on it and most topics are from years ago. I''m curious to know to whether this functionality is still supposed to work. I''m aware that

can someone overthere help? the server specs are as follows HP DL380G4 Dual Intel Xeon 3.2GHz processor with 4GB RAM, running fedora core 3 asterisk-1.2.5 ss7-0.8.3d. using sip as advised to receive calls from another gateway in US. using g729 in transcoding way. however, I noticed the call hit the 51 active calls which is 102channels, I run "top" to check the system resources usage

My Dell 2800 Dual 64bit Proc. machine came in with hyperthreading enabled. (they call it virtual processor??) I have been intending for a month to disable it. Tonight, I rebooted, turned it off, and let the system come up. zaptel loaded and asterisk loaded, but both of my t1s were red. (it is a TE411P) /proc/interrupts looked OK, zttest gave OK numbers. I doublechecked all of the files in case

I've to setup Asterisk on a Dell PowerEdge 1750 server. Its dual Xeon 3GHz with Hyperthreading. People on this list who have experience with this server please advise me how is the performance of Asterisk on this server, what flavour of linux is good on it etc. Is Hyperthreading going to be a problem or not. I once read somewhere that hyperthreading caused some voice quality problems in

Hi, I can''t get rid of an annoying domU machines hanging issue with Hyperthreading enabled in my BIOS. Hardware config: IBM x325 series 2 * CPUs Intel Xeon 3.06 Ghz Xen version: 3.0.0 Kernel version: 2.6.12.6 Linux distrib: Debian Sarge 3.1 r1 I run 1 domU machine on my dom0, here is my Xen config: . xen0: /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp : (dom0-num-cpus 0) .

I could swear that I remember seeing some announcement somewhere that Zaptel now supported drop-and-insert across spans on a TE410P, but now I can't find it. Am I imagining this? We just got our TE410 up and running, and if we could cross-connect digital channels with it, I think we'd buy another one for the remote end (instead of using the T100P we have). Searching Google ("zaptel

Hi, with regards Intels L1TF vulnerabilities, it seems they are somewhat non-committal on whether turning off HyperThreading is required, suggesting people > Consult with your hypervisor vendor for more guidance. https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/architecture-and-technology/l1tf.html#faq-answers-10-0 What is the consensus in the Libvirt community about the risks (or not) of leaving

I''m trying to start a number of lvm-backend domUs on a Dell Poweredge 2850 (i''ve got nousb on the grub command line, and no usb in the kernel). Some domUs are created and started successfully. However, quite a few of my domUs don''t start properly. I get the correct Started Domain messages... but then the domain doesn''t "go anywhere", meaning

Does anyone know if you can have multiple TE110P cards in one chassis? -Thermal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061011/adbceeb5/attachment.htm

Hello, I read an interesting article on 2cpu.com that talks about the performance differences between a P4 processor with Hyperthreading(HT) enabled and disabled. http://www.2cpu.com/articles/ht_explored/index.html The bottom line of the article is that processor intensive applications greatly benefit from HT being enabled, but memory intensive applications can actually see a slight decrease in

That's the problem we had with Asterisk and HT on a 2.4 Kernel: whenever Asterisk was staying in the RTP stream, and HT was enabled (on a Dell Dual Xeon system), we had choppy audio. After disabling HT, everything was fine again. Nothing measurable, indeed, but you could definitely hear it. So there *must* be something. -Manuel -----Messaggio originale----- Da: Peter Corlett

Hi, my video sharing website (politube.org) that I developed with rails, runs on lighttpd/fcgi (I know it is obsolete by now) and is severely under load and regularly blocks because the lighttpd process chews up 50% of RAM (1GB). So now I want to move the system to a new server with 8GB, 64bit , Quad core processor (intel i7 920) but I am not sure if hyperthreading will really do anything better.

On 04/19/2017 12:18 PM, PJ Welsh wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org > <mailto:johnny at centos.org>> wrote: > > On 04/18/2017 12:39 PM, PJ Welsh wrote: > > Here is something interesting... I went through the BIOS options and > > found that one R710 that *is* functioning only differed in that

On 04/18/2017 12:39 PM, PJ Welsh wrote: > Here is something interesting... I went through the BIOS options and > found that one R710 that *is* functioning only differed in that "Logical > Processor"/Hyperthreading was *enabled* while the one that is *not* > functioning had HT *disabled*. Enabled Logical Processor and the system > starts without issue! I've rebooted 3

In the past, there have been reports of problems with Asterisk with multiple processors and/or HyperThreading. I'm having a !@#$ of a problem with an HPDL380 with 2 3.4gHz Xeon processors, 2 gb RAM -- if I got 24 hours I'd think I had died and gone to heaven :) Am I missing something obvious like "Asterisk is single CPU, single core?" I can't access the ILO so I