similar to: * and Zap on AMD64/Opteron

i try another xen experiance on a AMD-Opteron 165 processor, but this happens: VmError: HVM guest support is unavailable: is VT/AMD-V supported by your CPU and enabled in your BIOS? cat /proc/cpuinfo: processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 15 model : 35 model name : Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 165 stepping : 2 cpu MHz : 1000.000

Package: xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 Version: 4.0.1-4 Severity: important *** Please type your report below this line *** Hello Debian Team, I have some strange behavior with a DL585 G7 with only two cpu sockets used (Opteron 6238 Interlagos). I use Debian 6.0 with a XEN Kernel. Every time when I start a DomU, the server makes a hard reset without any kernel panic or output. When I start the

Author: kucharsk Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: b1f167e9bcec854103004aa601a56ab937e1223c Log message: 6288246 amd64 kernel needs to detect AMD Opteron erratum 131 Files: update: usr/src/uts/i86pc/Makefile.workarounds update: usr/src/uts/i86pc/os/cpuid.c update: usr/src/uts/i86pc/os/mp_startup.c update: usr/src/uts/intel/sys/controlregs.h

Hi, I was wondering if anyone has had good experiences using R on Linux with dual AMD64 (Opteron) processors. I'm thinking of buying a couple of such servers, but I'd like to make sure R would work fine. The "R Installation and Administration" guide notes that there may be some problems with BLAS libraries. That's all I could find about R on AMD64. Please share your

Dear All, I have a K8S-MX Asus Athlon 64 Motherboard with a 754 pin 3000+ CPU, which I cam trying to install 4.1 Centos 64 bit. The problem seems to arise when installing onto Mirrored disks, I have noticed that from Centos 4 onwards it tries to rebuild the arrays as it installs which slows the whole process right down across all platforms I have tried it on. In addition, the install

I am considering buying a Quad Opteron for asterisk, However i'd like not to buy one and see that it aint working ;) -> would asterisk compile for opteron ? -> would ilbc compile for opteron ? -> would the g729 license work on opteron ? -> would zaptel compile and run ? (TE410p) And if not, would it demand a lot of work to get it running ? Would using 64 bit actually be faster

Hi folks, an Asterisk (www.asterisk.org) box will be built with the following specs and I wanted to know if CENTOS has a built process/config/parameter/special distro to target the AMD Opteron Dual Core plataform: 2 amd opteron 265 dual core 1.8 Ghz 2mb l2 cache 2x1024 ocz c2-6400 dual channel gold GX XTC 2 Seagate 16mb cache 300 GB barracuda 7200 drives another 2 Seagate 500 GB 16mb cache

Hi All, I've just started caring for a dual Opteron machine. It has a 3Ware 9500S-12 RAID controller, a Tyan S2882G3NR motherboard, 10 IBM 400GB disk drives, and a 650 watt power supply. It has been behaving itself quite nicely until recently. The poor behavior started when I upgraded the OS from CentOS 4.1 (32 bit) to Centos 4.1 (x86_64). When running in uniprocessor mode, the system

> From: Douglas Bates > > How does the Opteron perform on floating point? Can you try something > like > > > mm = matrix(rnorm(1e6), nc = 1e3) > > system.time(crossprod(mm)) > [1] 0.51 0.02 0.53 0.00 0.00 > > system.time(crossprod(mm)) > [1] 0.37 0.03 0.40 0.00 0.00 > > system.time(crossprod(mm)) > [1] 0.38 0.02 0.40 0.00 0.00 > >

Hi, Installed 1.4.0 libpri and 1.4.0 zaptel and everything went smoothly. I configured asterisk 1.4.0 with no problems (./configure), but when I compile it (make), it fails with this error: [LD] res_snmp.o snmp/agent.o -> res_snmp.so /usr/bin/ld: /usr/local/lib/libz.a(gzio.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile

Hey, I am currently considering a two machine Xen setup based on AMD Opterons, more precisely Dell R515s or R415s with dual Opteron 4274HE. Does anyone has some Xen setup(s) running on top of Opterons 4274HE, Opteron 4200 or Dell R515 machines and is willing to share some experience? In particular, I am interested in using Debian squeeze (Xen 4.0.1, Linux 2.6.32) for dom0 and most domUs. Any

Hello Can you share your experience with running XEN on different hardware? Does any body run XEN either 2.0.6/7 or 3.0devel on following machines: 1) nForce4 based motherboard either with single or dual core CPU 2) ASUS 1U server AP140R-E1 --- P4 http://www.asus.com/products4.aspx?modelmenu=2&model=137&l1=9&l2=40&l3=116 3) MICROSTAR Server Barebone K1-1000D (MS-9245) 1U ---

You can try to run "make" in the linux source-folder. I had the same problem Running FedCore 4 on a Dual Xeon Server and running make fixed the error ________________________________ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Chris Teesdale Sent: 15 February 2006 12:19 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject:

I've tested both 6.3 and 7.0-RC2, amd64 architecture, and have found the occurrence of an interrupt storm using an ASUS A8N-SLI Premium (nForce 4) motherboard with an AMD Opteron 175. Relevant dmesg output: atapci0: <nVidia nForce CK804 UDMA133 controller> port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xf000-0xf00f at device 6.0 on pci0 ata0: <ATA channel 0> on atapci0 ata1: <ATA

> I have been looking at XenSource 3.0 solution for running virtual > servers on opteron servers. According to XenSource''s documentation, it > runs on Opterons with pacifica feature. My understanding is that we > need this feature for following reaons: > - lower virtualization overhead. Theoretically, 3-5% overhead for > guest oses when virtualized > - running guest

Hi I'm setting up a SIP gateway, serving quite a few potential users, and I wonder if I should purchase a Opteron or Xeon based system. Xeon has it's HT, but is it worth it? Has anyone tested Opteron on asterisk? Does it work well? There'll be no transcoding in this system - G.711A all way through roy

> From: Douglas Bates [mailto:bates at bates4.stat.wisc.edu] > > "Liaw, Andy" <andy_liaw at merck.com> writes: > > > Sorry. I need to retract my claim. There seems to be a 3G > limit, even > > though the OS could handle nearly 8G. (I can have two > simultaneous R > > processes each using near 3G.) > > > > On another note, on

> From: Douglas Bates [mailto:bates at bates4.stat.wisc.edu] > > "Liaw, Andy" <andy_liaw at merck.com> writes: > > > Sorry. I need to retract my claim. There seems to be a 3G > limit, even > > though the OS could handle nearly 8G. (I can have two > simultaneous R > > processes each using near 3G.) > > > > On another note, on

hi there. anyone have any tips on params to pass to the kernel etc in order to install Centos4 or Centos5 32bit or 64 bit installed on this unit i can get it close to install, yet no cigar. it is a tyan MB and ill try to get more info if needed... for this case, please assume for now that the hardware itself is not "bad" thanks in advance... - rh Rackable Systems Dual Opteron 2.0

Hello, CentOS-virt list. The institution where I work has been donated some older IBM BladeCenters with IBM's LS-20 blade servers installed. These LS-20's are equipped with Opteron 275 processors (dual-core, dual-socket). In researching my virtualization options, I initially wanted to do oVirt, but after thoroughly investigating, it appears that oVirt, being based on KVM, will not