similar to: RTP stream path : please help!

Hi everybody, I'm trying to configure * for make SIP calls. Now I'm doing several test but I have some errors. Firstly I will describe my scenario. Client Software (Private IP 192.168.0.181, SJ Phone over Windows 2000) ---- Router Adsl (Public ip A.B.C.D, and NAPT on port 5060 to 192.168.0.181) ----- FW+Router ----- Asterisk (Public IP E.F.G.H + e400p)------ Spain ISDN I

Here is the setup: Phone A (in NYC) on own bandwidth. Phone B (in LA) on own bandwidth. Asterisk box in Houston,TX on own bandwidth. Both phones contact asterisk to register. Not much bandwidth used for this as it is a few packets every hour or so. Phone A calls Phone B. Phone A sends a call request to asterisk and asterisk calls phone B. Both phones are connected and both people are talking.

FYI, asterisk DOES now support g723, but you have to pay for it: http://store.yahoo.com/asteriskpbx/asteriskg729.html -----Original Message----- From: Dan Fernandez <danfernandez00@hotmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 17:33:05 -0300 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Has anyone gotten SIP_CODEC= to work? Basically, since I?d like to use g723 for sip

I'm running a Samba 3.0.0 server in production in security = ADS mode against a W2k ADS server. Works just fine, thanks! We're sort of under pressure to regrade to a 2003 AD server, which sent me trying stuff out a bit. Meager results. The 3.0.0 I have (linked with MIT krb5-1.2.8) refuses to verify incoming tickets: [2003/10/28 16:27:36, 3]

Hiyas, Is there a patch for the 2.4.x series to do ip6tables bridging of IPv6 packets? I was unable to go to 2.6 due to issues with large packets so still living in 2.4 land. If there are no patches, any ideas on what gets patched in IPv4 to allow this bridging? -Scott __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Gregory Sloop <gregs at sloop.net> wrote: > I love the idea of a low-power high-performance appliance. A NAS will > work fine for storage, but it's not going to act as a DC etc. [At least > none that I'm aware of and would trust.] > > Even appliances sorta like this, that I've seen, are easily five times the > price. > >

Hi! I have a new problem with my SIP device.I have done some changes and now I receive continuosly a SIP message: "501" "Not impelmented" back from the SIP Gateway. I can see that it doesn't register to Asterisk. I have in the SIP device: Registrar 1: UnRegistered to: 2222 registrar: 188.208.12.237 5060 expires: 2000 name: gateway passwd: 123 My

Hi all, I have setup a dispersed cluster (2+1), version 3.12. The way our users run I guessed that we would get the penalties with dispersed cluster and I was right.... A calculation that usually takes about 48 hours (on a replicaited cluster), now took about 60 hours. There is alot of "small" reads/writes going on in these programs. Is there a way to tune, optimize a dispersed cluster

Dear r-help members, Could any of you help me with this model, please? This model gives error when some value touch whatever border and I do not know how to correct it. The 80% of the seeds produced by a plant will fell into the parent cell, the 15% in the first ring according to the king movement (in chess), and a 5% in the second ring defined by the queen2 matrix. Someone said me the functions

I am having some problems with g729 with SIP and ZAP channels. 1) I have two g729 licences. Very frequetnly (I don?t know what triggers the error) I get the following warnings and error when I try to place a call via SIP to my X100P. The only way to get out of this is through a restart of *. When the error ocurrs there are no other calls in place. Any ideas? Error Opening channel:2 not

Hiyas, I''m trying to make a mediactrl with no parent or with my application as the parent, so it can play music in the background (I''m making a simple alarm app), but I cant seem to get it workin. Any ideas or does it need to have a frame as a parent? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi all, I have setup a dispersed cluster (2+1), verision 3.12. I guessed that we going to get punished by small read/writes... and I was right. A calculation that usually takes 48 hours took about 60 hours and there are many small read/writes to intermediate files that at the end get summed up. Is there a way to tune, optimize a dispersed cluster to work better with small read/writes? Many

Hi All, I'm using gluster as dispersed volume and I send to ask for very serious thing. I have 3 servers and there are 9 bricks. My volume is like below. ------------------------------------------------------ Volume Name: TEST_VOL Type: Disperse Volume ID: be52b68d-ae83-46e3-9527-0e536b867bcc Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 1 x (6 + 3) = 9 Transport-type: tcp Bricks:

Dear list, This is a question about overdispersion and the ML estimates of the parameters returned by the glm.poisson.disp (L. Scrucca) and glm.nb (Venables and Ripley) functions. Both appear to assume a negative binomial distribution for the response variable. Paul and Banerjee (1998) developed C(alpha) tests for "interaction and main effects, in an unbalanced two-way layout of counts

On Mar 20, 2024, at 13:16, Wayne Barron <wayne at cffcs.com> wrote: > In Windows and Linux web servers, we can create a forest for our web servers. > Send traffic to different servers to even the workload. > > Can we do something like this with the Icecast servers? > (or) > Will we have to install new VMs, add the heavy stations on that one, > and send the new traffic

Dear all My 5 cents (or Rappen in CH) if it comes to serving many clients. We are running a 4 node cluster since several years ? rock solid and w/o any issues. This cluster serves many thousands of listeners from all over the world. Our source transcoder sending the audio streams to each Node. Hence, transcoding power is not an issue here. The four Nodes a geographically dispersed in 3

If you add bricks to existing volume one host could be down in each three host group, If you recreate the volume with one brick on each host, then two random hosts can be tolerated. Assume s1,s2,s3 are current servers and you add s4,s5,s6 and extend volume. If any two servers in each group goes down you loose data. If you chose random two host the probability you loose data will be %20 in this

Hi, I've been disappointed today with some of my Xapian results. Here is the issue : - I am searching for the terms "ipod vid?o 60" (with the OR operator) - the first results sorted by relevance are : (name / description) 1. Etui en cuir Shinnorie EZgoing pour iPod avec vid?o 60 Go - Blanc Etui en cuir Shinnorie EZgoing pour iPod avec vid?o 60 Go - Noir - With the SA1

Hi Mauro Tridici, >From the information provided it appears like you have placed 2 bricks of a subvolume on one host. Please confirm. The number of hosts that could go down without losing access to data can be derived based on the brick configuration/distribution. Please let us know the brick distribution plan. Regards, Sunil kumar Acharya Senior Software Engineer Red Hat

I'm working on upgrading a set of our gluster machines from 3.7 to 3.10- at first I was going to follow the guide here: https://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Upgrade-Guide/upgrade_to_3.10/ but it mentions: > * Online upgrade is only possible with replicated and distributed > replicate volumes > * Online upgrade is not supported for dispersed or distributed >