similar to: Strange SIP registry behavior

Can I adjust the ssh daemon to log IP addresses instead of hostnames? I assume this situation is feasible... * 10.10.10.10 attempts to ssh to the server * reverse dns resolves to "somehost.domain.com" * ssh daemon logs "somehost.domain.com" in messages * foward dns on "somehost.domain.com" resolves to 10.10.10.20 Thus it causes some of my scripts a problem if the

Mark has fixed the REGISTER issues to be more RFC compliant. I've created a new thread so that those of you who got bored with the old thread might read this new one. The feature that has just been added was added a while ago, but now it actually seems to _work_. :-) If you have a SIP server to which you are trying to REGISTER, and they demand valid domain (the part after the

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:43:59AM -0500, Mahmoud Al-Qudsi wrote: > Hello all, > > I know that one of the original design goals of libhivex was to be > resilient to corrupt, invalid, or malicious registry hives. I've > encountered some undefined behavior in libhivex when attempting to open > registry files that are too small. I'm not sure if this is a known issue >

Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: >I wasn't talking about bandwidth but rather lengthy >Dial() commands... > >exten => s,1,Dial(SIP/someuser&SIP/someuser&SIP ...... > >kind of thing... seems awfully unwieldy. That's why you would stick the members into a global variable [globals] DIYCALLGROUP => SIP/111&SIP/112&SIP113 etc. then dial using

Hello all, For some reason I am not showing registration in SIP. Can anyone give me an idea what can cause this? asterisk1*CLI> sip show registry Host Username Refresh State -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050311/bd3a7577/attachment.htm

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752 Summary: Lack of Message file and Eventlog Application Source registry entries result in event log errors Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: Cygwin on NT/2k Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2

> On Nov 11, 2014, at 1:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > Yes I was also meaning to do that after reading lcamtuf's postings. Yup. That's the one. > I just started a run now .. Will let it run for a few days and report > any issues on the list. Thank you. Do you mind running it under valgrind to catch out-of-bound reads? Mahmoud

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752 kevin.m.smyth+mindrot at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin.m.smyth+mindrot at gmail | |.com --- Comment #4 from

Greetings: I've just attempted to upgrade from openssh-2.1.1p1 to openssh-2.1.1p3 and I'm having problems with the server component. My system runs RedHat Linux 6.2 (x86 version) with all currently released updates applied. The sshd daemon is being spawned by xinetd with the -i option and worked fine with the p1 level release. Now, when a remote client attempts to connect to the daemon,

Hello all, I know that one of the original design goals of libhivex was to be resilient to corrupt, invalid, or malicious registry hives. I've encountered some undefined behavior in libhivex when attempting to open registry files that are too small. I'm not sure if this is a known issue per-se or not, so I figured I'd ask here on the mailing list before I jumped in and started adding

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 09:26:30PM -0500, Mahmoud Al-Qudsi wrote: > On Oct 29, 2014, at 3:39 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >> Or is it expected that certain sanity checks would be performed prior to > >> passing along any files to libhivex? What would those checks be? > > > > No, hivex should definitely have those checks.

Using: Redhat 7.1 wine release 20011004 Windows 2000 Any time I run wine, whether the windows app I'm calling works (like sol.exe) or bombs (like iexplore.exe), I get the following error messages: Line 8848: Key is too long '[Software\\Microsoft\\Protected Storage System

Every morning I check my SIP registry to the SIP-provider. And I must conclude that during the night somewhere registry has failed. asterisk*CLI> sip show registry Host Username Refresh State Reg.Time 85.119.188.3:5060 092779077 105 Failed Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:11:40 asterisk*CLI> sip reload [Jul 6 10:30:43]

http://voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+bounty+SIP+simultaneous+registry From the WIKI: Contributions Manager: Daniel Jimenez (cuban) Bounty: $50 USD Date opened: July 10, 2004 Contributors: cuban ($50) Detail Yes, Yes I know you could do all sorts of fun with the dialplan to produce a similar effect, but I still would like to be able to do this. Plus it's easy money :). I

Hi, In installed a new Trixbox-based system on Friday and initially had some problems with the system registering with our service provider (voip.co.uk), which I put down to the router's configuration. Anyway, the system was finally 'fixed' and worked well until Monday and then just stopped registering with voip.co.uk and I have spent the whole day trying to encourage it back online.

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.11.22.161:10000;branch=z9hG4bK-a860600e\x0d\x0a From: Jian Gao <sip:8181234567 at my.provider.com>;tag=7e9c4091bfc704bco0\x0d\x0a To: Jian Gao <sip:8181234567 at my.provider.com>\x0d\x0a Call-ID: daf96244-769f952c at 10.11.22.161\x0d\x0a CSeq: 48998 REGISTER\x0d\x0a Max-Forwards: 70\x0d\x0a Contact: Jian Gao <sip:8181234567 at

Hi, My asterisk's version is 1.6.0.26. I've couple sip providers and I've for new SIP provider I need define outbound proxy. Everything is ok in peer section (outboundproxy=192.0.2.1). But what about SIP REGISTER messages? I need send SIP register messages also via outbound proxy. How to write SIP OUTBOUND call register statement and send this to proxy? If I define in general

Dear dovecot developers, I have an issue with the Pigeonhole IMAPSieve Plugin and the order in which administrator scripts are executed. Although I cannot find anything about the order in which the scripts are executed, I would expect they are executed in the order they are defined: the one defined by imapsieve_mailbox1_* before the one defined by imapsieve_mailbox2_* in case both match. I

Hi folks, I find that nmblookup seems to be receiving responses to name queries, but ignoring them. Here's what's happening: # nmblookup somehost querying somehost on x.y.255.255 name_query failed to find name somehost But watching the transaction with ethereal on the local host, I see that: 1. nmblookup on local udp port nnnn (some random number above 1024) sends an nbns

I have a Cisco 2600 which understands the "gsmfr" codec, which appears to be what Asterisk calls "gsm" -- at least it ends up using it. I also have a PSTN gateway which is speaking ulaw. When the 2600 calls through Asterisk to the PSTN, it negotiates the g711ulaw codec, but when the PSTN calls through Asterisk to the 2600, it seems that Asterisk is doing translation, and it