similar to: iLBC support in Asterisk after Google's acquisition of GIPS

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "iLBC support in Asterisk after Google's acquisition of GIPS"

2011 Sep 23
0
Asterisk 1.8.7.0 Now Available
The Asterisk Development Team announces the release of Asterisk 1.8.7.0. This release is available for immediate download at http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk/ The release of Asterisk 1.8.7.0 resolves several issues reported by the community and would have not been possible without your participation. Thank you! Please note that a significant numbers of changes and fixes have
2011 Sep 23
0
Asterisk 1.8.7.0 Now Available
The Asterisk Development Team announces the release of Asterisk 1.8.7.0. This release is available for immediate download at http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk/ The release of Asterisk 1.8.7.0 resolves several issues reported by the community and would have not been possible without your participation. Thank you! Please note that a significant numbers of changes and fixes have
2003 Apr 16
4
iLBC
i tried asterisk ilbc codec against kphone. when the call got connected, i started to immediately get these kind of message to the console: WARNING[14350]: File codec_ilbc.c, Line 141 (ilbctolin_framein): Huh? An ilbc frame that isn't a multiple of 52 bytes long from RTP (50)? WARNING[14350]: File codec_ilbc.c, Line 141 (ilbctolin_framein): Huh? An ilbc frame that isn't a multiple of
2008 Apr 13
1
compilation of asterisk 1.4.19 with ilbc already on system
I already have ilbc installed on my system. The files are: /usr/include/ilbc/iLBC_decode.h /usr/include/ilbc/iLBC_define.h /usr/include/ilbc/iLBC_encode.h /usr/lib/libilbc.a /usr/lib/libilbc.la /usr/lib/libilbc.so -> libilbc.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib/libilbc.so.0 -> libilbc.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib/libilbc.so.0.0.0 However, if I do a "make" in asterisk-1.4.19, it will not detect that libilbc.a
2004 Sep 27
0
Speex/ILBC buggy with * 1.0 and X-Lite/Pro?
I'm playing with codecs at the moment and have found some notices errors when x-lite/pro connects to asterisk with Speex or ILBC. Initially I was getting garbled sound, but after changing magic number for both codecs to 97 (as per http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk%20phone%20xten%20xlite and http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000918) I was able to get normal voice. BUT,
2006 Feb 13
1
iLBC issue: An ilbc frame that isn't a multiple of 50 bytes long from RTP (38)
Hello all, I've started implementing iLBC on some of the ATAs we have floating around clients' homes, but I'm coming against this error message with most of them: codec_ilbc.c: Huh? An ilbc frame that isn't a multiple of 50 bytes long from RTP (38)? The ATAs in question are various Grandstream models - the HT486 being the predominant one. Looking at the list archives, it's
2005 Oct 05
0
call transfer problem - something strange
Hi, I try to set up planet VIP-050 with asterisk. Everything works fine instead of the call transfer. When I press # console says something like this: >Oct 5 11:11:20 DEBUG[25104]: chan_sip.c:2222 sip_rtp_read: Oooh, format changed >to 1024 >Oct 5 11:11:20 WARNING[25104]: codec_ilbc.c:144 ilbctolin_framein: Huh? An ilbc >frame that isn't a multipleof 50 bytes long from RTP
2004 Jul 09
1
RE: ATA 186, firmware SIP 3.1 and codec g.726 + now SIPURA SPA-2000
To me it's a error if I can't complete calls using the ATA configured to use the g726 codec. I just tried it usign a sipura SPA-2000 (preferred codec: G726-32) and I received NOTICES and WARNINGS, but I can't complete a call. On a zap channel: -- Executing Dial("SIP/2007-e4d8", "Zap/1/2217008") in new stack -- Called 1/2217008 -- Zap/1-1 answered
2004 Sep 25
1
ilbc problem
Hello, I'm going to use * as SIP<->H.323 proxy (codecs doesn't matter - only pass through). I compile * (v1.0.0) without any problems as far as H.323 stack (pwlib, etc). But when I'm trying execute asterisk -vvv I'm getting error message: [codec_ilbc.so]Sep 25 15:15:43 WARNING[16384]: loader.c:248 ast_load_resource: /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_ilbc.so: undefined
2005 Sep 06
0
Speex or iLBC?
>>> Steve Underwood <steveu@coppice.org> 9/6/05 2:05:53 AM >>> > However, most other systems either don't support iLBC, > or throw it in as an extra because they have the ROM space, and it costs > them nothing. It costs them nothing as long as they can afford to run real time floating point code, which is the only one released as open source and
2008 Apr 02
0
Asterisk 1.4.19 and Asterisk-addons 1.6.0-beta3 Released
The Asterisk development team has released version 1.4.19 of Asterisk and 1.6.0-beta3 of Asterisk-addons. The new Asterisk-addons release contains a few bug fixes over the previous version. http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk-addons/tags/1.6.0-beta3/ChangeLog?view=markup Asterisk 1.4.19 contains a large number of fixes over the previous release, 1.4.18. For a full list of changes, see the
2008 Apr 02
0
Asterisk 1.4.19 and Asterisk-addons 1.6.0-beta3 Released
The Asterisk development team has released version 1.4.19 of Asterisk and 1.6.0-beta3 of Asterisk-addons. The new Asterisk-addons release contains a few bug fixes over the previous version. http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk-addons/tags/1.6.0-beta3/ChangeLog?view=markup Asterisk 1.4.19 contains a large number of fixes over the previous release, 1.4.18. For a full list of changes, see the
2007 Mar 14
1
strange things on call transfer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm setting up an Asterisk system which is connected to an Alcatel 4400 PBX. On the * I permit g729 and gsm as codecs. If I try to transfer a call by hitting the # key, I get this messages and nothing happens on the phone: WARNING[30110]: codec_ilbc.c:175 ilbctolin_framein: Huh? An ilbc frame that isn't a multiple of 50 bytes long from
2004 Jul 13
1
segmentation fault on asterisk startup
Hi, I write to this list, because I didn't find anything on the net. I installed asterisk using bristuff-0.0.2 without any errors, but when I start asterisk with "asterisk -vvvc" I get following error: [codec_ilbc.so] => (iLBC/PCM16 (signed linear) Codec Translator) == Registered translator 'ilbctolin' from format ILBC to SLINR, cost 127 Segmentation fault Removing
2007 Apr 27
4
Unable to find a codec translation path from ilbc to ulaw
Hi! As the upstream of my DSL-connection is very slow, I'd like my sip-phones to use iLBC to connect to my *. My gateway provider only allows ulaw. Hence, I'd like to use the follwing setup: SIP-phone <--iLBC--> Asterisk <---ulaw----> PSTN-Gateway I get the following error: "Unable to find a codec translation path from ilbc to ulaw" Setup SIP-phone: disallow=all
2005 Sep 05
2
Speex or iLBC?
Hi kind developers, I need select soon the best freeware VOIP codec, I see that all competitors are using iLBC because of the separate packets management. How speex behave in case of packets drop? Why other choice all iLBC? Thank you for any kind answer. Best regards. ------------------------------------- Roberto Della Pasqua Http: www.dellapasqua.com Email/Msn: roberto@dellapasqua.com
2011 Jun 22
1
iLBC re-licence
Does anybody know if the updated licence on iLBC makes it safe to include in Asterisk when used in a commercial environment again? https://sites.google.com/site/webrtc/ilbc-freeware It seems to require that the Google iLBC licence document is on the box, but that otherwise it is free-to use by all in any way (BSD licence style). I believe that prior to that there was a requirement to register
2006 Apr 29
2
Codec G729 no longer works.
I upgraded my server from Fedora Core 4 to Fedora Core 5. I was wondering if anybody else has run into the problem and know's the fix? I recompiled asterisk and if I don't have the /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_g729a.so file in place it works. I use or used to use the licensed G729 Codec from Digium. This is the error message from asterisk -vvg: [app_playback.so] => (Sound File
2005 Sep 21
0
Speex and Builder
> 1) May I know how Speex compared with GIPS codec? It seems that Google, > Yahoo, and Skype are licensing from GIPS. Are there any good benchmarking > or fair comparisons? I think these two emails sum up my opinion about Speex vs. iLBC: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2005-June/003410.html http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2005-September/003652.html > 2) In
2005 Jun 11
0
Comparison
Le vendredi 10 juin 2005 ? 21:27 -0400, SteveK a ?crit : > I'm not an expert either, but I see people choosing iLBC over speex > all the time with asterisk; partly it's because they have more > market share in hardphones, and partly it's because of marketing and > such. (another reason is that iLBC source is included in asterisk, > and speex is only compiled in