similar to: Installing Xen on Ubuntu 11.10 desktop

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "Installing Xen on Ubuntu 11.10 desktop"

2011 Nov 08
3
ubuntu 11.10, system V runlevel compatability
I''m having a problem with the boot sequence hanging indefinitely at "stopping system V runlevel compatibility". Here are the steps I took to get to this point: 1) installed a single boot, server version of ubuntu 11.10 (intended to be dom0) 2) apt-get install xen-hypervisor-4.1-amd64 xen-utils-4.1 xenwatch xen-tools xen-utils-common xenstore-utils 3) updated grub as follows: -
2019 Jan 09
2
LTO, ifuncs, and lld
It's at this point where I think about filing a full bug report with llvm. Any hints before I do? On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 04:00:02PM -0500, Shawn Webb wrote: > It looks like this commit breaks CSU initialization with > statically-compiled applications. > > With a very simple application at [1], compiled with: > cc -g -O0 -flto -static -o pid pid.c > > The application
2018 Dec 01
2
LTO, ifuncs, and lld
Thanks for providing the patch! I got around to testing it this morning and it appears it fixes compilation, but produces a non-working system. I know that's kinda vague and I'll have more details soon, including sample binaries. I at least wanted to give a status update so you didn't think you were being ignored. Thanks, -- Shawn Webb Cofounder and Security Engineer HardenedBSD
2018 Nov 29
2
LTO, ifuncs, and lld
Hey Peter, Here you go! https://hardenedbsd.org/~shawn/2018-11-28_reproduce-01.tar Thanks, -- Shawn Webb Cofounder and Security Engineer HardenedBSD Tor-ified Signal: +1 443-546-8752 Tor+XMPP+OTR: lattera at is.a.hacker.sx GPG Key ID: 0x6A84658F52456EEE GPG Key Fingerprint: 2ABA B6BD EF6A F486 BE89 3D9E 6A84 658F 5245 6EEE On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 05:30:57PM -0800, Peter
2013 Sep 10
0
[LLVMdev] [lld] buildbot configuration on using -fsanitize options
FYI We have an upstream bootstrap bot ( http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap) that does a number of things including running llvm/clang tests under ASan/MSan. Probably we can add a couple of steps that would checkout lld and run check-lld in ASan-ified/MSan-ified build trees. On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org>wrote:
2013 Sep 10
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] buildbot configuration on using -fsanitize options
Does it build with libstdc++? I've got this with fresh clang, -std=c++11: In file included from ../projects/lld/lib/ReaderWriter/ELF/./SectionChunks.h:19: In file included from ../projects/lld/include/lld/Core/Parallel.h:28: In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/condition_variable:38:
2013 Sep 12
0
[LLVMdev] [lld] buildbot configuration on using -fsanitize options
Hi Evgeniy, Can you add the step to checkout lld and build and run the unittests then ? Thanks Shankar Easwaran On 9/10/2013 4:59 AM, Evgeniy Stepanov wrote: > Does it build with libstdc++? I've got this with fresh clang, -std=c++11: > > In file included from ../projects/lld/lib/ReaderWriter/ELF/./SectionChunks.h:19: > In file included from
2008 Jul 10
1
Boot fails unless "noacpi" option is present.
Hello, I am using Xen 3.2.1 and I cannot boot it on my machine unless I use the noacpi option. As far as I know noacpi option is incompatible with SMP, so I must not use it, because my machine is SMP. I am describing the problem in more detail below. If you could point me in the right direction, I''d greatly appreciate it. I downloaded Xen 3.2.1 official source distribution tarball from
2012 Feb 16
1
Samba4 gid-to-sid question
Hi. We used info from a SID created using samba-tool group add to posix-ify it and then add a posix-ifed domain user to it. The AD doco defines two sorts of SID. Ones that change, and ones that don't. Here is a search on our posix-ified group: ldbsearch --url=/usr/local/samba/private/idmap.ldb 'xidnumber=3000012' objectSid: S-1-5-21-980186919-4150830324-975011627-1121 We set the
2016 Feb 12
3
[cfe-dev] Buildling with/without AddressSanitizer causes divergent execution behaviour
On 11 February 2016 at 17:08, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Dan Liew via cfe-dev > <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> > Can you somehow verify that this heap-use-after-free is happening? >> > E.g. print all the pointer values coming from memory::allocate, coming >> > into >> >
2018 Nov 29
2
LTO, ifuncs, and lld
Hey LLVM folks, I've run into an interesting assertion. In one of HardenedBSD's feature branches, we're working on integration llvm's Cross-DSO CFI implementation. Using Cross-DSO CFI requires building libs with LTO, which causes clang to emit LLVM IR intermediate object files rather than ELF intermediate object files. I've found that with lld, attempting to link LLVM IR
2006 Feb 06
2
panel.levelplot() for 2D histograms
Dear R-wizards, I'm trying to plot "binned scatterplots", or 2d histograms, if you wish, for a number of groups by using the lattice functionality it works fine for one group at a time, and probably I could find a work-around, but I prefer to do it the elegant way here's an example of what I want, what I tried and where it goes wrong: require(gregmisc) require(lattice) #toy
2015 Jan 29
2
[LLVMdev] LNT install
I followed the lnt quickstart <http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html> directions but got this diagnostic when doing the setup: bash-3.2$ ~/mysandbox/bin/python ~/lnt/setup.py develop /Users/dcallahan/mysandbox/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py:284: UserWarning: The version spec\ ified requires normalization, consider using '0.4.1.dev0' instead of
2007 Apr 25
1
Centos 5 Reproducible Reboot
Guys, I've just setup 5.0 and can reproduce a crash/reboot every time. Details; x86_64 Install Using Xen Kernel System fully updated including Xen Kernel (latest 1.1 update) Intel Dual Core E6400 4gb RAM I've installed vmware server 1.0.2 from rpm. It has been configured and is ready to create new machines. I have successfully created a new machine but when I attempt to power-on the
2012 Feb 26
1
Samba4 xidNumber and idmap.ldb
Hi everyone The s4 Domain Users group has xidNumber: 100 and the Linux users group has gidNumber=100. I've been mapping xidNumber <--> gidNumber for s4 posix groups I've added myself, but this causes a name collision for Domain Users. This also has implications on Linux as local users have access to the group owned stuff of Domain users. I've changed the xidNumber in
2001 Jan 02
1
best encoding
I've got some songs that I need OGG-ified as high quality as possible for my site, and I'm not sure how to go about doing it. I've checked out the tools available, but I'm wondering if there's anything else I should know about the process (above and beyond how to run the apps). Any advice in this area would be greatly appreciated. These suckers have got to be PERFECT...
2015 Jan 30
1
[LLVMdev] LNT install
Hi David, That's weird, I have setup LNT in multiple different distros and have never seen this. Looks like no one ever tested on the system you're running. Can you share a bit more of your environment? Also, you can check the setup.py to see if it does any stripping of package names, which could go wrong in the wrong environment. cheers, --renato On 29 January 2015 at 20:13, David
2007 Mar 21
6
Converting Rails app to desktop with XUL?
Hi, We are thinking about choosing Rails as our weapon of choice for our next project, which is basically a text editor on steroids, whith some functionality that need an Internet connection. In the first step we are going to develop it as a plain web app (AJAX-ified, yay!), however, in the next step we would like to port some of the functionality (such as the editor) to a desktop app (which can
2017 Jul 06
3
Should we split llvm Support and ADT?
Sure, I guess that splitting the arrayref/stringref headers out is a fine first step. -Chris > On Jul 5, 2017, at 5:07 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: > > Re-writing StringRef / ArrayRef etc to use the exact same API is a good idea long term, but there's a lot of ugly messy details that need to be dealt with. There's thousands of uses of take_front /
2013 Sep 09
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] buildbot configuration on using -fsanitize options
On 9/8/2013 11:48 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org>wrote: > >> Do you know if llvm itself gets tested as a complete build with the >> fsanitize options ? >> >> Enabling tsan seems to be a good idea too. >> > We test it very regularly with all of the sanitizers. We've not been