similar to: scp forces original access permissions when owner lacks write access

Folks-- I'm working with an old system I set up to copy files from one local directory to another. I was using rdist for this, but I would prefer to shift it over to rsync. The one thing I'm missing is the trivial ability to force the group owernship of the destination files to a specific group. A read through the manpage and various searches on the web do not turn up any helpful hints

Hello, I have one question about the ALU scheduler. If for example I have one UNIFY volume which is using ALU scheduler with the following config: volume unify type cluster/unify option namespace afr-ns option scheduler rr option scheduler alu # use the ALU scheduler option alu.limits.min-free-disk 3% # Don't create files one a volume with less than 5% free diskspace

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4220 Summary: --backup causes "stat" failed message when trying to delete a directory Product: rsync Version: 2.6.0 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

Hi, I've been attempting to use rsync 3.1.2 to copy files from a macOS 10.12.2 system to an AFP mounted share. The command I'm using is: rsync -avAX -M--fake-super ./testDir ./mnt/testDir/ This works fine and all the extended attributes are copied and readable. I then try to use rsync to copy these files back with: rsync -avAX --fake-super -M--super ./mnt/testDir/ ./testDir2/ This

Assuming you are aware Apple 10.12.1/2 did a number on crypto, broke SSH, HTTPS to "legacy" servers. R/ Everett Batey / Skype: wa6cre-10 / efbatey at gmail.com Please visit So Calif Linux Expo http://www.socallinuxexpo.org On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Steven Kilby <stevenkilby2 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I've been attempting to use rsync 3.1.2 to copy

Jan, since i can not cc you mail address when filing a bug on oss bugzilla,just paste the bug description here. Testing env, Kernel version:latest linus's mainline 2.6.27 Testing Nodes:test5/6 Description: Jan,i used your provided quota tools,now it works for me:),currently,i'm doing a sanity check for the quota on ocfs2. Found a strange thing when comparing with the ext3,the quota

Dear r-helpers, I am looking for an R-equivalent for the eval-function in javascript which can interpret a string as code on runtime, thereby allowing things like for (i in c(1:2)) { eval(items + "i") <- read.csv(eval(filename+ i), dec=","); } which would execute (with filename="testfile"): items1 <- read.csv(testfile1, dec=","); items2 <-

Hello, I'm using samba 3.0.2(acl) and kernel 2.4.24+acl, libacl-2.2.23. Following problem: When I create a file in an directory with extended ACLs, samba applies the "create mask" in a wrong way (IMHO). The normal behaviour of tools like chmod is that the second (middle) permission field is mapped to the "mask" ACE if the file has an extended ACL, so that the change

Hi, I've a question about the syntax of the valid users option. Any help is greatly appreciated! Here is the Background: samba 3.0.4 Linux as Domain Member Active Directory, not in Native Mode Compiler opions: --with-winbind --with-pam --with-smbmount The goal is to authenticate via the Windows Domain and allow access via Windows groups. The syntax in my smb.conf looks like this:

Hi all I am still unsure of the correct way to configure member servers. I have one PDC (Samba 3.026a on Solaris 9) and several member servers (including Samba 3.026a on Solaris 9 and 10, and Samba 3.024 on Fedora core 6.) Each machine uses NIS for unix accounts. The "Samba by Examble" Book indicates that even if I am using NIS for user accounts, and not using LDAP for a idmap

> Normally a group cannot 'own' files etc, Unix uses ugo permissions and > when you chown a file you would use something like this: > > chown foo:somegroup somefile > > this would make 'foo' the owner of the file and possibly allow > 'somegroup' access to it, this would depend on whatever permissions you > set with 'chmod' > > So,

On 01/28/15 14:04, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 28/01/15 18:45, Alberto Valdes Gonzalez wrote: >> Hi Rowland: >> >> voyager /data/company # ls -la folder1/ >> insgesamt 56 >> drwxrwxr-x+ 1 administrator dom?nen-benutzer 744 26. Sep 12:45 . >> drwxr-xr-x 9 root root 4096 25. Sep 23:33 .. >> drwxrwxr-x+ 1 user dom?nen-benutzer 200

I now have one PDC (Samba 3.026a on Solaris 10) and several member servers (including Samba 3.026a on Solaris 9 and 10, and Samba 3.024 on Fedora core 6.) Each machine uses NIS for unix accounts. If I start smbd and nmbd on a member server, I can connect to a share from a windows 2000 or XP client. If I look at the permissions on a folder, if shows "Unix Account/someuser" or

Hello, I want to access a shared folder on my linux from a windows machine. The smb.conf has this entry ?? [samba_share] ??????? comment = QEMU share place ??????? path = /media/samba_share ??????? valid users = mahmood vb ??????? public = no ??????? writable = yes ??????? printable = no ??????? create mask = 0777 Then I added a user to samba with "smbpasswd mahmood". The folder mask

I realize batch mode is still experimental, but I was hoping there might be a workaround for a problem I am getting. I have been trying to run some tests and I get the below error when I use the --read-batch option to. I can successfully create an initial set of batch files, then a second set based upon a few modified test files from the first batch. When I first run the --read-batch option

> OpenSSH_3.4p1, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090607f > AIX 4.3.3.0 Maintenance Level 10. > > I have run a test on my boxes and found the following: > > > scp test <remote_machine>:~/test > test 100% |*****************************| 16000 > 00:00 > > > > scp works fine, but when I tried to redirect stdio/stderr to files they >

Hello I'm running some tests to compare performance between Gluster FUSE mount and formated sparse files (located on the same Gluster FUSE mount). The Gluster volume is EC (same for both tests). I'm seeing HUGE difference and trying to figure out why. Here is an example: GlusterFUSE mount: # cd /mnt/glusterfs # rm -f testfile1 ; dd if=/dev/zero of=testfile1 bs=1G count=1 1+0 records

Hi, Recently I noticed file.copy() would discard the file mode information. Is this the expected behaviour or a bug for file.copy()? > file.create('testfile') [1] TRUE > file.info('testfile') size isdir mode mtime ctime testfile 0 FALSE 644 2011-03-05 17:06:39 2011-03-05 17:06:39 atime uid gid uname grname

Hi, Recently I noticed file.copy() would discard the file mode information. Is this the expected behaviour or a bug for file.copy()? > file.create('testfile') [1] TRUE > file.info('testfile') size isdir mode mtime ctime testfile 0 FALSE 644 2011-03-05 17:06:39 2011-03-05 17:06:39 atime uid gid uname grname

Hi Dmitri, On 22/09/17 17:07, Dmitri Chebotarov wrote: > > Hello > > I'm running some tests to compare performance between Gluster FUSE mount > and formated sparse files (located on the same Gluster FUSE mount). > > The Gluster volume is EC (same for both tests). > > I'm seeing HUGE difference and trying to figure out why. Could you explain what hardware