similar to: OpenSSH and Solaris SEAM/Kerberos

I'm trying to get openssh to work with SEAM(Solaris Enterprise Authentication Mechanism) on Solaris 9. I have a few questions. Any help would be appreciated. I am working with openssh 3.8. 1. First of all, does anyone know if it is possible to get openssh working with SEAM? 2. Which options do i need to use when compiling openssh? Do i need to use --with-kerberos5=kerbpath or --with-pam

i've compiled openssh with the gssapi patches on a solaris 8 system using sun's SEAM. gssapi isn't initializing properly it seems. debug2: input_userauth_request: try method gssapi debug1: Mechanism negotiation is not supported Failed gssapi for xxxx from xxxx port 33555 ssh2 sun's kerberized tools are working fine. any help would be appreciated. -- http://chemlab.org -

Hi, Thank you very much for you reply. Some people think storing the sensitive information in the LDAP is not very secure.They think the sensitive information and the public information should be stored in seperate place.So we want the samba PDC authentication can integrete the Kerberos authentication directly. John ---- Original Message ---- From: Yura Pismerov Date: Thu 10/31/02 18:39

Hi, Andrew, Thank you very much. I have read some information about the samba PDC kerberos authentication as below. >> Anyone worked with a combination of Samba (TNG, or 2.x) running as a PDC for >> a network of primarily NT workstations, with the passwords being >> authenticated back into a Kerberos IV database? or a Kerberos V? > >> I'm trying to get this

A few more questions and comments... related to this topic If Kerberos is the back-end to LDAP.. there is no need to synchronize or store a password in the LDAP tree.. just the principal for the user in the userpassword attribute: userpassword = {kerberos}name@domain in the smb.conf file do I need stuff like this? Unix password sync = yes passwd program =

Jonathan Higgins wrote: > > A few more questions and comments... related to this topic > > If Kerberos is the back-end to LDAP.. there is no need to synchronize or store a >password in the LDAP tree.. just the principal for the user in the userpassword >attribute: userpassword = {kerberos}name@domain That is correct. I did not mean sync between Kerberos and LDAP, I mean sync

I know it''s completely off topic, but I am having such a hard time with this that I thought maybe I might be able to get some answers here. I''m a Rails developer recently forced into a Java Seam/Richfaces project. The presentation layer is so convoluted with stuff that it''s virtually impossible for me to get the kind of presentation I want without creating multiple XML

Hi, Andrew, Thank you very much for your answer. Now our case is as below: 1, our client machine is the windows 2000 2, We want our Kerberos run in the Unix box. 3, We also want the samba as PDC for all windows user and machine. 4, We want integrate the Kerberos Authentication with samba authentication. So in this situation, can we get the kerberos login from the windows

Hi All, I was hoping someone would know the answer to this question I had... I know the rsync daemon has the "Max connections" module, which works great. However, I was wondering if there was a good way for me to: 1: Query rsync to get the number of live connections it thinks it has? 2: Or better yet, how does rsync itself check for the number of connections? I'm trying to

Hi, In the great tradition of web framework comparisons ;-) : here is a blog entry focused on a source code analysis of RoR, Django and Seam: http://www.mininglabs.com/2008/05/13/web-frameworks-a-free-software-oriented-study --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To

I am running Solaris 8 with the Basic Security Module (BSM) loaded and Sun's Enterprise Authentication Mechanism (SEAM) installed. Our servers are using Sun One Directory Services (LDAP) for authorization and Sun's Kerberos 5 implementation for authentication. We have been using OpenSSH 3.4p1 with OpenSSL 0.9.6f and everything has been working fine. We are updating our OpenSSH and OpenSSL

I have been frustrated with J2EE technology just like any other developer who has worked in that technology for a long time. This made me learn about Rails and I was excited about RoR. Today I came across JBoss Seam framework and I am not able to contain my excitement. My passion for JEE development is back. It seems like it is better than RoR. I would like to hear differnt opinions about this

I just tried to build the 4.7p1 on AIX 5.2, with Kerberos 5 enabled, using the IBM Kerberos implementation (krb5.client.rte, krb5.toolkit.adt, etc.) Is this supposed to work, or is the full MIT Kerberos distribution required? IBM provides an older version of OpenSSH (4.3p2), with Kerberos support, but there are some problems with it, and I was hoping the problems would be resolved with

Gang, For those who asked about making a Solaris system a Kerberos client to Active Directory, the magic document to have is: http://www.connectathon.org/seam1.0/files/c0101.htm See the section "How to Configure a SEAM Client Using a Windows 2000 KDC". SEAM was Sun's Kerberos client stuff in Solaris 8; it is just there as part of Solaris 9 and 10. These instructions apply if

Hi ya'll- I'm having this weird problem with the new version of OpenSSH compiled on Solaris, version 4.3p2. SSH and SSHD work fine, all is well. But when I try to sftp or scp something I get this: % sftp bullitt Connecting to bullitt... command-line: line 0: Bad configuration option: PermitLocalCommand Connection closed % "PermitLocalCommand" doesn't appear in

Hi. I've had this patch a while (and I posted an earlier version a while back): it tries to use krb5-config to obtain the Kerberos build options. If it's not available, or isn't in the path specified to --with-kerberos5 then the existing behaviour is kept. It seems to work for me with MIT and Heimdal. I got some feedback from one person, would any of the Kerberos-using folk care to

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1078 Summary: passing --without-kerberos5 still checks for some kerberos support Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Documentation AssignedTo:

Hi ya'll- I've got this odd openssh problem with Solaris 10 I was hoping someone could shed some light on. Not sure if it is a bug... Basically I'm trying to use pubkeys as an auth method, but am having issues. I can log in using passwords no problem, but as soon as it notices a matching public key it closes the connection. I ran the sshd server (on Solaris 10 box) in debug

I agree that this sounds like, and indeed is, a recipe for disaster. I was going to explain some of the woes of our environment but I don't think it's actually relevant after looking at my problem a bit more. If I'm way off base I'm happy to be herded back, but please tolerate me as I share what I am seeing today because I really hope to solve the narrow issue of SMB file access

> > When I try to > > access even an already-mounted NFS directory to which I have permission, > > gssproxy complains: > > > > Jul 10 08:55:51 smb gssproxy: gssproxy[1469]: (OID: { 1 2 840 113554 1 2 > 2 > > }) Unspecified GSS failure. Minor code may provide more information, > > Client 'host/smb.soe.ucsc.edu at AD.SOE.UCSC.EDU' not found in