similar to: OpenSSH compatibility with Tru64 version 4.0F?

Hi Fei Jia, What revision are you using? I suggest you to try C backend with the most recent LLVM version, if possible. I recall I had some similar C backend breakages in July-August: structs definitions were lost somewhere. To my understanding, the correct result should look like this: /* Typedefs */ typedef struct l_unnamed_0 l_unnamed_0; typedef struct l_unnamed_1 l_unnamed_1; /* Structure

On Sep 21, 2011, at 6:13 PM, Fei Jia wrote: > Could anybody provide me some links or pages or infos of the difference of bitcodes of C and C++? We have implemented an optimization pass on bitcode generated from C, and we are trying to find out whether it will work on bitcode from C++. Thanks! > Hi Fei, There isn't a difference in the bitcode format of a C as opposed to a C++ program.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1104 Summary: Compile error "ldLL" not declared in strtonum.c under Tru64 Unix 4.0f Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.2p1 Platform: Alpha OS/Version: OSF/1 Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: Build system

Could anybody provide me some links or pages or infos of the difference of bitcodes of C and C++? We have implemented an optimization pass on bitcode generated from C, and we are trying to find out whether it will work on bitcode from C++. Thanks! -- Best Regards, Fei Jia -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi Bill, Thanks for reply! I am sorry I didn't express my question clearly. Examples may explain well. Now I am trying to analyze the data flow of programs. I first compile the C code to bitcode, and then apply our algorithm to the bitcode to find the dependency between statements. But as to C++ code, there are class, vector, reference, I may need to revise my algorithm to analyze bitcode

I convert C to bytecode by LLVM, and then convert the bytecode back to C by LLC, but the generated C code cannot be compiled. Could anyone give me some suggestions? Thanks! The initial C file is rather simple (hello world): #include <stdio.h> int main() { printf("hello world\n"); printf("hello world1\n"); return 0; } The two commands:

Dear editor: I'm writing this letter to enquire where can I download the package of "lmtest". Can you send me this package? THanks a lot. Best regards, Shu-Fei Wu

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Long Fei wrote: > > This didn't work as I tried with 197.parser. it works without > "-Wl,-disable-opt" switch though. > > [197.parser]$ llvm-gcc analyze-linkage.c and.c build-disjuncts.c > extract-links.c fast-match.c idiom.c main.c massage.c parse.c post-process.c > print.c prune.c read-dict.c utilities.c xalloc.c word-file.c

This didn't work as I tried with 197.parser. it works without "-Wl,-disable-opt" switch though. [197.parser]$ llvm-gcc analyze-linkage.c and.c build-disjuncts.c extract-links.c fast-match.c idiom.c main.c massage.c parse.c post-process.c print.c prune.c read-dict.c utilities.c xalloc.c word-file.c strncasecmp.c -Wa,-disable-opt -Wl,-disable-opt -lm -o llvm_parser [197.parser]$

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Long Fei wrote: > which suggests the compiling command: > gcc -DSPEC_CPU95 -O2 -o spec_go g2.c g22.c g23.c g25.c g26.c g27a.c g27b.c > g28.c g29.c g2eye.c g2jlib2.c g2jos.c g2list.c g2reas.c g2s2.c g2s3.c g2shp.c > and the running commandline: > ./spec_go 50 9 2stone9.in > < are these correct ? > I believe that we only include test/train inputs for

So, before I waste another couple of hours at this, is it possible to compile Samba 3.0.x on Tru64 at all? If so, can you tell me what the ./configure switches are? Thanks, Nate

On 22 September 2011 03:30, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >> I am trying to find such difference of bitcode between C and C++. > > There isn't any difference in that sense... in IR, a constructor is > just a function call, a reference is just a pointer, etc. Hi Fei, While Clang (like others) lowers C++ into C semantics and lower that into IR, there are

This fixes a bug in changeset 22526:7a5ee3800417, where the wrong value is read when deciding whether to flush the VTd tables. The effect is minor: in situations where the p2m entry is changed but the mfn is the same, the VTd tables will be unnecessarily flushed. old_entry is left untouched in the second case, since having a present old_entry will cause the an unnecessary check to be taken at

Another difference is the presence of exceptions in C++, which would require you to handle more IR instructions. This might not matter depending on type of analysis you do. See: http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#i_invoke (Note that there is a substantial rewrite of exception handling going into 3.0) Anna. On Sep 22, 2011, at 3:29 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 22 September 2011 03:30, Eli

Some of the run commandlines don't seem to be the *default ref* configuration. For instance, in 099.go, what's in the script is: LEVEL = ../../../.. BM=099.go ifeq ($(RUN_TYPE),test) STDIN_FILENAME = /dev/null STDOUT_FILENAME = null.out RUN_OPTIONS = 40 19 else STDIN_FILENAME = 2stone9.in STDOUT_FILENAME = 2stone9.out RUN_OPTIONS = 50 9 endif include ../../Makefile.spec95

Long Fei wrote: > > I am investigating some inlining issue, so I did > > llvm-gcc aaa.c bbb.c ... nnn.c -o output > opt -inline -inline-threshold=xxx < output.bc | llc -march=c > > output_inline.c I am unsure of whether the LLVM GCC frontend does any inlining. However, I do know that your methods above run the LLVM inlining pass, albeit indirectly. If you use

FEI: the CVS changelog is no longer updating. cras's commits look like this: date: YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS +TZDD; author cras; state Exp; lines +1 -0 but cvs2cl.pl (2.50) demands: date: YYYY/MM/DD HH:MM:SS; author cras; state: Exp; lines +1 -0 cvs2cl.pl version 2.55 still can't parse these lines. I patched my cvs2cl.pl so I could still follow dovecot, but I'm not certain these

Dear Sir, I remember that I can use multibyte NETBIOS name (just as Traditional Chinese) in Microsoft Windows to talk with the previous version of samba (maybe 2.0.7). But since I use 2.2.3a (which is included in RedHat 7.3), the log file name is incorrect when the client use multibyte NETBIOS name. And when I use the newest version (2.2.6), if the client use multibyte NETBIOS name, then the

Dear R users, I've been trying to find an R package which does the PL estimation of spatial GLMMs especially with the negative binomial model. so it would be something similar to the "proc GLIMMIX" with the PL method in SAS. I've looked up some possible packages related to GLMMs, but it doesn't seem to be anyone using the PL estimation. Thanks for your help! Fei He UCR

On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Fei Jia <j.jiafei at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Bill, > Thanks for reply! I am sorry I didn't express my question clearly. > Examples may explain well. Now I am trying to analyze the data flow of > programs. I first compile the C code to bitcode, and then apply our > algorithm to the bitcode to find the dependency between statements. But as