similar to: X11 forwarding to IPv6 enabled host not working.

Hi, openssh-1.2.2p1 seems to have 2 problems on ipv6 (and ipv4 mapped addresses). 1. "BREAKIN ATTEMPT" warnings from ipv4 node 2. X forwarding The following patche fixes them. Thanks. diff -ru openssh-1.2.2p1/canohost.c openssh-1.2.2p1-20000308/canohost.c --- openssh-1.2.2p1/canohost.c Fri Jan 14 13:45:48 2000 +++ openssh-1.2.2p1-20000308/canohost.c Wed Mar 8 00:25:18 2000 @@

On Linux (and others that define DONT_TRY_OTHER_AF) x11_create_display_inet() will only use the first entry returned by getaddrinfo(). When binding sockets to "ANY" this is fine on Linux since a PF_INET6 socket bound to ANY will also include IPv4. However when x11_use_localhost (X11UseLocalhost) is set, this is a problem. getaddrinfo() will then return an AF_INET6 entry with IPv6 address

Hi, I think we should try other AF for "x11_use_localhost" case. --- openssh-3.1p1/channels.c Tue Mar 5 10:57:45 2002 +++ openssh-3.1p1-fix/channels.c Thu May 2 21:26:28 2002 @@ -2356,6 +2356,13 @@ continue; } } +#ifdef IPV6_V6ONLY + if (ai->ai_family == AF_INET6) { + int on = 1; + if (setsockopt(sock, IPPROTO_IPV6, IPV6_V6ONLY, &on, sizeof(on)) < 0)

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1309 Summary: X11 forwarding doesn't work with X11UseLocalhost=no Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.3p2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org

leanneHi OpenSSH team, I am still able to reproduce this problem with openssh50 code both on hpux. Seems like OpenSSH didn't fix this problem completely. how to reproduce: 1. root at sshpa4# uname -aHP-UX sshpa4 B.11.23 U 9000/800 3267743753 unlimited-user license 2. sshd_config X11Forwarding yesX11DisplayOffset 10X11UseLocalhost no // must not use "yes" to bind

After upgrade from previous version I can't run rsync. 2004/05/09 10:40:54 [18630] rsyncd version 2.6.2 starting, listening on port 873 2004/05/09 10:40:54 [18630] rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at socket.c(466) strace shows that there is problem with listen() I've found patch on this lists: --- rsync-2.6.2/socket.c.orig 2004-05-08 23:25:11.979473336 +0200 +++

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164 ------- Additional Comments From yoshfuji at linux-ipv6.org 2002-05-18 09:44 ------- Created an attachment (id=97) Try to set IPV6_V6ONLY if available. Open ::1 and 127.0.0.1 if x11_use_localhost is set. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Hey All, In a two node glusterfs setup, with one node down, can't use the second node to mount the volume. I understand this is expected behaviour? Anyway to allow the secondary node to function then replicate what changed to the first (primary) when it's back online? Or should I just go for a third node to allow for this? Also, how safe is it to set the following to none?

Hi, Dear OpenSSH support, I'm writing to ask whether this bug is fixed in your openSSH 6.0. If no, do you have any plan? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640857 Regards, Carol

Hi, You need 3 nodes at least to have quorum enabled. In 2 node setup you need to disable quorum so as to be able to still use the volume when one of the nodes go down. On Mon, Apr 9, 2018, 09:02 TomK <tomkcpr at mdevsys.com> wrote: > Hey All, > > In a two node glusterfs setup, with one node down, can't use the second > node to mount the volume. I understand this is

removes HAVE_BOGUS_SYS_QUEUE_H and always use our queue.h. ok? Index: acconfig.h =================================================================== RCS file: /var/cvs/openssh/acconfig.h,v retrieving revision 1.122 diff -u -r1.122 acconfig.h --- acconfig.h 26 Feb 2002 16:40:49 -0000 1.122 +++ acconfig.h 12 Mar 2002 02:11:39 -0000 @@ -14,7 +14,6 @@ /* SCO workaround */ #undef

When I run gluster v heal datastore full errror into log is gfapi: Error disabling sockopt IPV6_V6ONLY The brick are up. Version is 3.13.2 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20180223/44c58392/attachment.html>

Is there a particular reason that sshd sets IPV6_V6ONLY on listen sockets? ---- Scott Neugroschl XYPRO Technology Corporation scott_n at xypro.com 805-583-2874

On Solaris 10 (SPARC & x86), I'm seeing the following error: error: Failed to allocate internet-domain X11 display socket. I tracked this down to this code change between openssh 4.7p1 and 5.0p1: *** openssh-4.7p1/channels.c Mon Jun 25 03:04:47 2007 --- openssh-5.0p1/channels.c Wed Apr 2 15:43:57 2008 *************** *** 1,4 **** ! /* $OpenBSD: channels.c,v 1.270 2007/06/25 08:20:03

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1648 Summary: Fix IPV6_V6ONLY for -L with -g Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: jan.kratochvil

On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 12:49:14AM +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote: > ------- start of forwarded message ------- > From: <mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org> > To: Matthew Vernon <matthew at empire.ucam.org> > cc: <openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org> > Subject: Re: [patch] GNU/Hurd compatibility patches > Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 12:39:32 -0500 (CDT) > > > We

Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes: > I've recently found that at least on my test box the `LISTEN *` line had > only set up an IPv4 `0.0.0.0` listener but not an IPv6 `::0` listener for > `upsd`. Interesting. On one system I checked, I have 4 explicit directives for 127.0.0.1, ::1, and the LAN on v4/v6. On another, I have an empty

Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes: > I've recently found that at least on my test box the `LISTEN *` line had > only set up an IPv4 `0.0.0.0` listener but not an IPv6 `::0` listener for > `upsd`. Interesting. On one system I checked, I have 4 explicit directives for 127.0.0.1, ::1, and the LAN on v4/v6. On another, I have an empty

On 4/9/2018 2:45 AM, Alex K wrote: Hey Alex, With two nodes, the setup works but both sides go down when one node is missing. Still I set the below two params to none and that solved my issue: cluster.quorum-type: none cluster.server-quorum-type: none Thank you for that. Cheers, Tom > Hi, > > You need 3 nodes at least to have quorum enabled. In 2 node setup you > need to

Wayne, I have been using the rsync snapshot from 1/25 for the last few days and everything seems quite solid so far. I include below a few nit-picks in case you're looking for thing to tidy up. I'm also looking forward to hearing news about the --filter option. I'm thinking it is going to be very useful for backup purposes. What I would want to be able to do is, on a