Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Blacklisting repeated login tries"
2003 Nov 28
2
GLM FITTED VALUES TABLE
Hi all
I have the following generalized linear problem.
In a study of allergic responses, patients arriving at a clinic in
Groote Schuur hospital were tested for sensitivity to a number of
substances. Three of these were moulds: Cladosporium (C), Alternaria
(F) and Aspergillius (T). Their level of sensitivity was measured on
the Rast Scale as: 0: not allergic 1: mildly
2008 Oct 30
0
(PR#13209) Arith ops dropping S4 *and* 'object' bit [Was: ...]
>>>>> "JMC" == John Chambers <jmc at r-project.org>
>>>>> on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:50:38 -0400 writes:
JMC> The asymmetry is just the symptom of a more fundamental
JMC> issue: There are no operator methods currently defined
JMC> for "vector" classes, either combined with each other
JMC> or with a non-S4 object.
1999 Oct 13
1
dataframe transposition
Dear R-helpers,
I wonder if I could impose upon you for forther assistance, this
time with dataframes: hopefully this will be of general interest,
as I personally have found them hard to get to grips with.
I was trying to transpose rows and cols and move col1 to the names.
Then all sorts of things go wrong. Although the end result looks
the same, page() shows the structure to be quite
2002 Oct 02
0
How to mount NT share & maintain NT share permission via SMB for LTSP user??
When a regular user (say, "jmc") logs onto my Linux (LTSP, Samba, DHCP)
server via his LTSP terminal I need an NT drive share to be mounted with
the permissions that NT intends.
Our NT file print server has a directory named "private" which contains
subdirectories for each user. Each user has NT read/write permissions to
his/her private subdir and no others. I need for each
2007 Oct 29
5
Stuck Voicemails?
This question is about 1.2.x asterisk. Please no flames, or "you should
upgrade to 1.4".
Does anyone know what might be the cause for 'stuck voicemail's in
1.2.6asterisk? By stuck, I mean the phones show a voicemail, and if
you log in
you get "you have 1 new voicemail", and if you delete it it says 'deleted',
however it remains. Going into the mail
2004 Mar 01
1
glm logistic model, prediction intervals on impact af age 60 compared to age 30
Dear R-list.
I have done a logistic glm using Age as explanatory variable for some
allergic event.
#the model
model2d<-glm(formula=AEorSAEInfecBac~Age,family=binomial("logit"),data=emrisk)
#predictions for age 30 and 60
preds<-predict(model2d,data.frame(Age=c(30,60)),se.fit=TRUE)
# prediction interval
2003 Sep 18
0
non-numeric binary ops?
Has there been a recent change in the behavior of binary operators?
In SparseM it was, until quite recently ok to do scalar multiplication
but now,
> A*4
Error in A * 4 : non-numeric argument to binary operator
> 4*A
Error in 4 * A : non-numeric argument to binary operator
> A%*%A
An object of class "matrix.csr"
Slot "ra":
[1] 1 1 1
Slot "ja":
[1] 1 2 3
2010 Oct 11
2
Why WOL? ( WAS: Re: Getting Wake on lan to work )
On a semi-related subtopic,
Why do I want WoL? What concrete examples are there where it's useful?
I understand what it is and how it works but the "why" has eluded me.
--
Drew
"Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be understood."
--Marie Curie
2008 Sep 09
2
[LLVMdev] Integer questions
On Sep 8, 2008, at 4:30 PM, OvermindDL1 wrote:
>> The Verifier pass is recommended; it catches a lot of
>> invalid stuff and be configured to abort, print an error to
>> stderr, or return an error status and message string.
>>
>> It doesn't catch everything though; codegen's error
>> handling today is usually an assertion failure, assuming
>>
2000 Jan 05
0
Statistical Software Prize
Dear colleagues:
This summer, the ASA will award a new prize for statistical software.
This note is to encourage you to apply or nudge someone you know to
apply.
The award is for software that contributes to better use of computing
in statistical research and applications, written while the applicant
was a student. There is a $1,000 prize plus the opportunity to give
an invited talk at the
2016 Apr 02
0
Upgrading Samba 3 to Samba 4 - Domain Controller unreachable
[global]
server max protocol = SMB2
# Line above added by lbarone - March 30, 2016
name resolve order = host wins lmhosts bcast
write list = @domainadmins
passwd chat = *new*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *updated*
admin users = machine,add,lbarone, at domainadmins
smb ports = 139
lock directory = /var/cache/samba
preserve case =
2016 Apr 02
0
Upgrading Samba 3 to Samba 4 - Domain Controller unreachable
OK, I've tried commenting the line out. Ran /etc/init.d/samba reload, but
no change. Should I try a full server reboot then?
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote:
> On 02/04/16 17:37, Luke Barone wrote:
>
>> [global]
>> server max protocol = SMB2
>> # Line above added by lbarone - March 30, 2016
>> name
2006 Oct 24
2
as.missing
(I'm not sure if this is a request for a feature, or another instance
where a feature has eluded me for many years.)
Often I have a function which calls other functions, and may often use
the default arguments to those functions, but needs the capability to
pass along non-default choices. I usually do this with some variation on
foo <- function(x, foo2Args=NULL or a list(foo2defaults),
2016 Apr 02
0
Upgrading Samba 3 to Samba 4 - Domain Controller unreachable
OK, I'm rebooting the server now. Removed that line first.
SELinux and App Armour are not installed on the servers. Tested with the
firewall down (iptables), ulimit is not being reached, still lots of memory
and hard drive space available... Since it's the weekend, no one else is in
the building except for me.
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>
2002 Aug 07
0
FW: [R] [ and setMethod conflict?
John Chambers suggested that I forward this thread (first posted to r-help)
along to r-devel...
Thanks,
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: John Chambers [mailto:jmc@research.bell-labs.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2002 6:31 PM
To: Bartz, Kevin
Cc: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [R] [ and setMethod conflict?
Definitely something funny going on, but perhaps a little less sweeping
2016 Apr 02
0
Upgrading Samba 3 to Samba 4 - Domain Controller unreachable
On 02/04/16 18:46, Luke Barone wrote:
> OK, this is working with the Windows 7 clients now. Looks like it was
> just a reboot. Now I have an issue with the Windows 10 clients... I'll
> open a new thread about that...
>
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Luke Barone <lukebarone at gmail.com
> <mailto:lukebarone at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> OK, I'm
2005 Nov 19
6
[LLVMdev] LLVM + GCC Integration Proposal
FYI:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-11/msg00888.html
It remains to be seen how well this will be accepted, but it gives some
insight on what is being worked on. In any case, this probably won't have
a large impact on the LLVM community, other than potentially more people
working on it.
-Chris
--
http://nondot.org/sabre/
http://llvm.org/
2008 Jun 03
2
Please, read and reply it to me.
How do you do?
I am a deaf and I am working at Gallaudet University as IT technician. For
troubleshooting computer problem, I fixed over 4000 computers with different
CDs such as Windows XP SP2, Dell 32bit Diagnostic Tools, Windows Memory
Tester, Acronis True Image, ERD 2005, and others. Everyday, I brought many
different CDs to different building for services. Really, I wanted to
develop
2005 Nov 19
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM + GCC Integration Proposal
If copyright is assigned to the FSF, would they change the license to GPL?
Also, would they be allergic to the VC++ suppport that currently
exists? After all, if they're not careful, going down this route may
result in a gcc that can be bootstrapped with VC++ :)
Chris Lattner wrote:
>
> FYI:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-11/msg00888.html
>
> It remains to be seen how
2005 Nov 19
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM + GCC Integration Proposal
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005, Jeff Cohen wrote:
> If copyright is assigned to the FSF, would they change the license to GPL?
We would work something out. That is a huge 'if'.
> Also, would they be allergic to the VC++ suppport that currently exists?
> After all, if they're not careful, going down this route may result in a gcc
> that can be bootstrapped with VC++ :)
I