similar to: Blacklisting repeated login tries

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Blacklisting repeated login tries"

2003 Nov 28
2
GLM FITTED VALUES TABLE
Hi all I have the following generalized linear problem. In a study of allergic responses, patients arriving at a clinic in Groote Schuur hospital were tested for sensitivity to a number of substances. Three of these were moulds: Cladosporium (C), Alternaria (F) and Aspergillius (T). Their level of sensitivity was measured on the Rast Scale as: 0: not allergic 1: mildly
2008 Oct 30
0
(PR#13209) Arith ops dropping S4 *and* 'object' bit [Was: ...]
>>>>> "JMC" == John Chambers <jmc at r-project.org> >>>>> on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:50:38 -0400 writes: JMC> The asymmetry is just the symptom of a more fundamental JMC> issue: There are no operator methods currently defined JMC> for "vector" classes, either combined with each other JMC> or with a non-S4 object.
1999 Oct 13
1
dataframe transposition
Dear R-helpers, I wonder if I could impose upon you for forther assistance, this time with dataframes: hopefully this will be of general interest, as I personally have found them hard to get to grips with. I was trying to transpose rows and cols and move col1 to the names. Then all sorts of things go wrong. Although the end result looks the same, page() shows the structure to be quite
2002 Oct 02
0
How to mount NT share & maintain NT share permission via SMB for LTSP user??
When a regular user (say, "jmc") logs onto my Linux (LTSP, Samba, DHCP) server via his LTSP terminal I need an NT drive share to be mounted with the permissions that NT intends. Our NT file print server has a directory named "private" which contains subdirectories for each user. Each user has NT read/write permissions to his/her private subdir and no others. I need for each
2007 Oct 29
5
Stuck Voicemails?
This question is about 1.2.x asterisk. Please no flames, or "you should upgrade to 1.4". Does anyone know what might be the cause for 'stuck voicemail's in 1.2.6asterisk? By stuck, I mean the phones show a voicemail, and if you log in you get "you have 1 new voicemail", and if you delete it it says 'deleted', however it remains. Going into the mail
2004 Mar 01
1
glm logistic model, prediction intervals on impact af age 60 compared to age 30
Dear R-list. I have done a logistic glm using Age as explanatory variable for some allergic event. #the model model2d<-glm(formula=AEorSAEInfecBac~Age,family=binomial("logit"),data=emrisk) #predictions for age 30 and 60 preds<-predict(model2d,data.frame(Age=c(30,60)),se.fit=TRUE) # prediction interval
2003 Sep 18
0
non-numeric binary ops?
Has there been a recent change in the behavior of binary operators? In SparseM it was, until quite recently ok to do scalar multiplication but now, > A*4 Error in A * 4 : non-numeric argument to binary operator > 4*A Error in 4 * A : non-numeric argument to binary operator > A%*%A An object of class "matrix.csr" Slot "ra": [1] 1 1 1 Slot "ja": [1] 1 2 3
2010 Oct 11
2
Why WOL? ( WAS: Re: Getting Wake on lan to work )
On a semi-related subtopic, Why do I want WoL? What concrete examples are there where it's useful? I understand what it is and how it works but the "why" has eluded me. -- Drew "Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be understood." --Marie Curie
2008 Sep 09
2
[LLVMdev] Integer questions
On Sep 8, 2008, at 4:30 PM, OvermindDL1 wrote: >> The Verifier pass is recommended; it catches a lot of >> invalid stuff and be configured to abort, print an error to >> stderr, or return an error status and message string. >> >> It doesn't catch everything though; codegen's error >> handling today is usually an assertion failure, assuming >>
2000 Jan 05
0
Statistical Software Prize
Dear colleagues: This summer, the ASA will award a new prize for statistical software. This note is to encourage you to apply or nudge someone you know to apply. The award is for software that contributes to better use of computing in statistical research and applications, written while the applicant was a student. There is a $1,000 prize plus the opportunity to give an invited talk at the
2016 Apr 02
0
Upgrading Samba 3 to Samba 4 - Domain Controller unreachable
[global] server max protocol = SMB2 # Line above added by lbarone - March 30, 2016 name resolve order = host wins lmhosts bcast write list = @domainadmins passwd chat = *new*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *updated* admin users = machine,add,lbarone, at domainadmins smb ports = 139 lock directory = /var/cache/samba preserve case =
2016 Apr 02
0
Upgrading Samba 3 to Samba 4 - Domain Controller unreachable
OK, I've tried commenting the line out. Ran /etc/init.d/samba reload, but no change. Should I try a full server reboot then? On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On 02/04/16 17:37, Luke Barone wrote: > >> [global] >> server max protocol = SMB2 >> # Line above added by lbarone - March 30, 2016 >> name
2006 Oct 24
2
as.missing
(I'm not sure if this is a request for a feature, or another instance where a feature has eluded me for many years.) Often I have a function which calls other functions, and may often use the default arguments to those functions, but needs the capability to pass along non-default choices. I usually do this with some variation on foo <- function(x, foo2Args=NULL or a list(foo2defaults),
2016 Apr 02
0
Upgrading Samba 3 to Samba 4 - Domain Controller unreachable
OK, I'm rebooting the server now. Removed that line first. SELinux and App Armour are not installed on the servers. Tested with the firewall down (iptables), ulimit is not being reached, still lots of memory and hard drive space available... Since it's the weekend, no one else is in the building except for me. On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>
2002 Aug 07
0
FW: [R] [ and setMethod conflict?
John Chambers suggested that I forward this thread (first posted to r-help) along to r-devel... Thanks, Kevin -----Original Message----- From: John Chambers [mailto:jmc@research.bell-labs.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2002 6:31 PM To: Bartz, Kevin Cc: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: Re: [R] [ and setMethod conflict? Definitely something funny going on, but perhaps a little less sweeping
2016 Apr 02
0
Upgrading Samba 3 to Samba 4 - Domain Controller unreachable
On 02/04/16 18:46, Luke Barone wrote: > OK, this is working with the Windows 7 clients now. Looks like it was > just a reboot. Now I have an issue with the Windows 10 clients... I'll > open a new thread about that... > > On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Luke Barone <lukebarone at gmail.com > <mailto:lukebarone at gmail.com>> wrote: > > OK, I'm
2005 Nov 19
6
[LLVMdev] LLVM + GCC Integration Proposal
FYI: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-11/msg00888.html It remains to be seen how well this will be accepted, but it gives some insight on what is being worked on. In any case, this probably won't have a large impact on the LLVM community, other than potentially more people working on it. -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/
2008 Jun 03
2
Please, read and reply it to me.
How do you do? I am a deaf and I am working at Gallaudet University as IT technician. For troubleshooting computer problem, I fixed over 4000 computers with different CDs such as Windows XP SP2, Dell 32bit Diagnostic Tools, Windows Memory Tester, Acronis True Image, ERD 2005, and others. Everyday, I brought many different CDs to different building for services. Really, I wanted to develop
2005 Nov 19
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM + GCC Integration Proposal
If copyright is assigned to the FSF, would they change the license to GPL? Also, would they be allergic to the VC++ suppport that currently exists? After all, if they're not careful, going down this route may result in a gcc that can be bootstrapped with VC++ :) Chris Lattner wrote: > > FYI: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-11/msg00888.html > > It remains to be seen how
2005 Nov 19
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM + GCC Integration Proposal
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005, Jeff Cohen wrote: > If copyright is assigned to the FSF, would they change the license to GPL? We would work something out. That is a huge 'if'. > Also, would they be allergic to the VC++ suppport that currently exists? > After all, if they're not careful, going down this route may result in a gcc > that can be bootstrapped with VC++ :) I