similar to: caching

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1015 Summary: terminal resize doesn't work for ssh caching Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.9p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1016 frederik at ofb.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|ssh caching sometimes hangs |ssh caching doesn't forward |on logout or login |X11 connections ------- Additional Comments From

Thanks Frederick. Mark, if you have any examples to share, they would also be gratefully received. Paul On 14/11/16 14:53, frederik at ofb.net wrote: > Hi Paul, > > OK I tried not to make the examples too fancy. > > Please let me know what you think. They should probably be amended to > support the Windows platform, but I think that task would be much > easier for someone

Ah, thank you for that explanation. I somehow didn't catch that my Bugzilla account had been disabled by a human. "Common pattern is to post ... something copied from a generic bug report" - that sounds very annoying. Frederick On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 11:54:11AM +0100, peter dalgaard wrote: > Unfortunately, the spammers in question appear to be human (of sorts). > >

No problem. Another suggestion would be to simply validate user input like most websites, and reject invalid submissions immediately, rather than blocking the user's account. I don't know what kind of spambots you are up against, but unless they are very intelligent I doubt they'll be able to understand a message like "You submitted a bug with no body text, please enter something

>>>>> <frederik at ofb.net> >>>>> on Tue, 24 May 2016 15:15:17 -0700 writes: > Thank you, Martin. I linked to your message in a comment here so maybe > other people will know about that useful technique: > http://singmann.org/installing-r-devel-on-linux/#comment-161 > However, when I try it, I get an error: > $ make

Hi Just taking a bit more of a look at this today (currently fixated on making sure I can build some good regression tests). The best thing you can do is to keep reminding me like this :) Paul On 09/12/16 11:19, frederik at ofb.net wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Thanks for your efforts. Do you have an idea when my patch(es) might > be committed? Is there anything I can do to help move this

Great. Thanks! Paul On 14/11/16 13:41, frederik at ofb.net wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Thank you, for some reason I didn't seem to get an email notification > for your bugzilla comment! > > I will try to send you something shortly. > > Frederick > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 08:55:20AM +1300, Paul Murrell wrote: >> Hi >> >> The current status is that

Hi Frederik, >>>>> <frederik at ofb.net> >>>>> on Tue, 7 Jun 2016 15:20:05 -0700 writes: > ... I just realized that setGraphicsEventHandlers or > getGraphicsEvent could have an 'onIdle' callback, to be > called somewhere in the polling loop of gevents.c:163 - I > think this would solve my problem #2 in a minimally

>>>>> Keith O'Hara <keith.ohara at nyu.edu> >>>>> on Tue, 24 May 2016 12:47:43 -0400 writes: > svn checkout https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/ <target-directory> yes, indeed. thank you, Keith. and from then on only cd <target-directory> svn up (which is short for 'svn update'). Another hint: Then do *not*

Hi The current status is that I am keen for people to contribute some testing code (see https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16951) There were also some getGraphicsEvent() changes/fixes suggested by Richard Bodewits (cc'ed), for which I am also seeking test code. Paul On 13/11/16 09:00, frederik at ofb.net wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Just checking in to see what the

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 08:13:21PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 10 January 2017 at 17:48, frederik at ofb.net wrote: > | Hi R Devel, > | > | I just ran into a corner case with 'strptime'. Recall that the "%OS" > | conversion accepts fractional seconds: > | > | > strptime("17_35_14.01234.mp3","%H_%M_%OS.mp3")$sec > |

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3176 Bug ID: 3176 Summary: can't figure out how to test StrictHostKeyChecking accept-new Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.3p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh

>>>>> Gabriel Becker <gmbecker at ucdavis.edu> >>>>> on Wed, 21 Feb 2018 07:11:44 -0800 writes: > Hi all, > For the record this approach isnt 100% backwards compatible, because > names(mergeddf) will e incompatibly different. Thatx why i claimed > bakcwards compatable-ish exactly. > That said its still worth considering

I agree with Martin's summary of the situation, and with the updated NEWS entry. I'm not familiar with Subversion, can you tell me the command to use? (I tried "svn co https://svn.r-project.org/R/" but it seems to be downloading all branches) Frederick On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 04:30:11PM +0200, Martin Maechler wrote: > >>>>> peter dalgaard <pdalgd at

>>>>> Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> >>>>> on Thu, 19 May 2016 10:26:44 +0200 writes: >>>>> <frederik at ofb.net> >>>>> on Wed, 18 May 2016 15:03:31 -0700 writes: >> Readline <= 6.2 shouldn't require the SIGWINCH patch, so >> if older versions have trouble finding

Dear R Devel, Sorry for sending so many emails, but I haven't heard that anyone is working on the patches I created. A few weeks ago I wanted to do something to contribute to R because I use it a lot. I picked the most annoying bugs I could find, and created two of the simplest patches I could create, but all I've had in response from the R core team (aside from briefly banning my

Hi Frederik, On Mon, 2017-01-16 at 18:20 -0800, frederik at ofb.net wrote: > Hi R Devel, > > I wrote some code which depends on 'strptime' being able to parse an > incomplete date, like this: > > > > > base::strptime("2016","%Y") > [1] "2016-01-14 PST" > > The above works - although it's odd that it gives the month

Hi Frederick, It looks like I didn't overwrite the patch.diff file after the last edits. Here's the correct patch (attached and copied below): Index: src/library/base/R/merge.R =================================================================== --- src/library/base/R/merge.R (revision 74280) +++ src/library/base/R/merge.R (working copy) @@ -157,6 +157,14 @@ }

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 06:28:46PM -0700, frederik at ofb.net wrote: > I think this is a good idea. Is there a reason why it got no interest? > Slippery slope? What's the next step? Can it get committed? > Or maybe others were also just occupied trying to figure out how > Joshua's second message had timestamp earlier than his first message? As a new subscriber, I guess my