similar to: /dev/random

A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text Size: 7366 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/attachments/20031015/02b75f40/attachment.ksh

Hello, I have some questions about removing the instrumented instructions at runtime. Assume I instrument some instructions by using some transformation passes. At runtime, I just need those instrumented instructions at the beginning, and I would like to remove instrumented instructions at runtime to reduce overhead. Does anyone know how to do this by using LLVM? Thanks, Bo -- View

Hi! How do i create consistent snapshots of VM''s from Dom0?. What are the backup methods or snapshot/snaprestore methods that are followed for Xen Virtual environments?. thoughts/ideas?. -- I have the simplest of tastes; I am easily satisfied with the best. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com

Dear all We are using a definition of rules which has perfectly worked with SuSE8.2 and vmware and a local samba on some clients. The systems got an update to 9.2. Now we got a very strange problem which probably could belong to an firewall definition problem. After booting of the system the samba connection to vmware works perfect but a few hours later it isn''t possible to copy a

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=830 Summary: ??iptables????????? Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org ReportedBy: higkoohk

> Assume I instrument some instructions by using some transformation passes. > At runtime, I just need those instrumented instructions at the beginning, > and I would like to remove instrumented instructions at runtime to reduce > overhead. At the beginning of what? You mean at the time of program starup? Then after detecting/collecting whatever you want, you would like to remove

good day to you i have compiled evertything related to ip tables as modules, but still i get this error when trying to use /etc/shorewall/routes can someone tell me the spicific module i need to have? here are my info intranet linux # shorewall version 2.4.2 intranet linux # uname -a Linux intranet 2.6.12-gentoo-r10 #10 SMP Sun Sep 11 15:01:49 SAST 2005 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+

Forgive the long post, just looking for input/advice/alternate opinions.. Like many I think that going through the exercise of framing user requests in Cucumber terms(Features, Scenarios..) really helps facilitate necessary conversations and avoid time wasted implementing the wrong thing(e.g. as a requirement/specification tool). However, I''m a bit confused when it comes to

Roger Marquis wrote: > [snip] > >It takes all of 2 seconds to generate a ssh 2 new session on a >500Mhz cpu (causing less than 20% utilization). Considering that >99% of even the most heavily loaded servers have more than enough >cpu for this task I don't really see it as an issue. > >Also, by generating a different key for each session you get better >entropy,

In a few weeks, no SIP call is going to terminate unless they are signed properly, as mandated by law. We are in the business of Stir-Shaken, signing calls, as an FCC-approved provider. A big differentiator between our service and the rest: we are the only ones who don't need to receive the calls in our servers to sign them. We do this over a MySQL call, easily connectable to Asterisk via

Hi, maybe someone could help me out here: I have a broken disk with serveral partitions (1-3 primary, 4 extended and 5-6 logical). I am able to get access to the primary partions and already recovered the data. I can see all partitions using fdisk -l /dev/hdc. But I cannot mount the logical ones: mount -t ext3 /dev/hdc5 /mnt mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on

I am looking for a decent provider of SIP Trunks but it has to pass the Stir Shaken token to the next carrier. Does anybody know about any? Sipstation from Sangoma, does not support Stir Shaken. ( Case #01466843 / 0013000000G8PLG / MAIN / Open [ ref:_00D306mPe._5004U1BlBLF:ref ]) Although it's mandatory, somehow they think it's ok. Go figure. -------------- next part -------------- An

On 01/08/2013 03:45 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > It's seems like a quiet and peaceful day, lets stir things up a bit :) > > How crazy would it be for us to start using basic C++'11 language features (but not C++'11 library features) in LLVM: things like auto, rvalue-refs, lambdas, etc? I think that we can keep things well defined with a few simple requirements: language

I need to point out the this is factually misleading and materially false: "I think this, being the basis of your whole argument, is the fallacy. S/S is forcing people to take responsibility, for sure, but carriers won't just let their customers leave because they don't want to sign calls. It will force them to make sure they know who their customers are, and make it impossible for

On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 17:34:10, Andre Lucas wrote: > Subject: /dev/urandom > On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 09:24:01AM -0700, SysProg - Nathan Paul Simons wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Ben Taylor wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Max Shaposhnikov wrote: > > > > why ssh1.27 doesn't requre /dev/urandom on solaris? > > > > i think the

> > There is a big confusion here about Stir Shaken. It is NOT a provider > issue. Un fact, all providers are whasing their hands and modifying their > swihtches to pass-through the Signature. They cannot sign the call because > then the become the responsible party for the call before the FCC, and > liable for any illegal call. Every owner of a PBX that sends calls to the >

Check out Twilio From: asterisk-users [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Federico Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2023 11:49 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> Subject: [asterisk-users] Question about Sip Trunks who support Stir Shaken I am looking for a decent provider of SIP

Telnyx, 382com, voicetel and as others mentioned BandWidth. I have contacts at 382 and voicetel if you want an intro. On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 11:50 PM Federico <federico at digitalipvoice.com> wrote: > I am looking for a decent provider of SIP Trunks but it has to pass the > Stir Shaken token to the next carrier. Does anybody know about any? > Sipstation from Sangoma, does not

It's seems like a quiet and peaceful day, lets stir things up a bit :) How crazy would it be for us to start using basic C++'11 language features (but not C++'11 library features) in LLVM: things like auto, rvalue-refs, lambdas, etc? I think that we can keep things well defined with a few simple requirements: language features must be supported by MSVC 2010 and later, some version of

On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:44:12 -0400, Matthew Fredrickson wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 2:34 PM Saint Michael <venefax at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> There is a big confusion here about Stir Shaken. It is NOT a provider issue. Un fact, all providers are whasing their hands and modifying their swihtches to pass-through the Signature. They cannot sign the call