similar to: 3.6p2 build errors on buffer_get with latest portable/SNAP

I have built the freshest CVS versions of openssh and still observe the same strangest behavior I encountered when trying to scp from a SuSE 7.2 to RedHat 7.1 system -- I built openssl-0.9.6e on RedHat as well-- and updated a lot of stuff; but still: ssh succeeds, and scp fails, leaving the following message in /var/log/secure: Aug 5 11:50:44 pdb-pc-6 sshd[4609]: fatal: buffer_get: trying to

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=243 Summary: fatal: buffer_get Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.0.1p1 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy: marco at linuxpro.nl

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=243 ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-05-15 21:17 ------- could you please provide full debugging output from the server and information on what authentication methods are tried? when does this happen? it looks like you have malformed entries in .ssh/authorized_keys ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1084 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED ------- Comment #2 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2006-10-07 11:42 ------- Change all RESOLVED bug to CLOSED with the exception

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=243 stevesk at pobox.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From stevesk at pobox.com 2002-07-18

Don't all IDEs have a debugger that can set a breakpoint and call functions from the program to see what they print? If you can't set breakpoints or call dump() on an LLVM value, you're going to have more problems than just this assertion. I don't think it's worth annotating all assertions with extra information, but this one probably happens often enough to deserve it. If

hello.. i am running openssh-3.7.1p2. on linux.It is working successfully..and daemon is running &client also connecting.But the problem is with the mips architecture when i connecting this server from remote syytem.?i got an error of buufer_get:trying to get more bytes 1 than buffer0.And client is not connecting from remote system.My out is as follows on my server ?in sshd main before

hello.. i am running openssh-3.7.1p2. on linux.It is working successfully.and daemon is running &client also connecting.But the problem is with the mips architecture when i connecting this server from remote syytem. i got an error of buufer_get:trying to get more bytes 1 than buffer0.And client is not connecting from remote system.My out is as follows on my server in sshd main before

Hi all, This is a client side only implementation of reversed dynamic (SOCKS) TCP forwarding, which means it is compatible with any existing servers have 'remote forward' capability. To establish such forward, use "ssh -R [BIND_ADDRESS:]PORT ...". The server will listen on that port and address and accept SOCKS traffics. Hope this will be useful for you. There was an

Hi, I would like to follow up on the recent discussion on the mailing list about requirements for new backends[1] by submitting the following proposal for a staging area for new LLVM backends. This proposal incorporates ideas from Owen, Chandler, and others who chimed in on the original thread, and I hope the LLVM developers will be able to come to a consensus on this proposal or a modified

Hi there, I have a weird problem with OpenSSH 2.9.9p2 on Solaris 8. Whenever I try to use ssh, scp or sftp to connect to the Solaris box, the connection is closed by the server and the following msg logged thru syslog: "sshd[542]: fatal: buffer_get: trying to get more bytes 129 than in buffer 39" I tried from an RH 7.1 client (2.9.9p2), from a Solaris 8 client (2.9.9p2), and an OpenBSD

On 06/04/10 05:12, Curtis Faith wrote: > I concur. I've run into this exact assert at least 10 different times in the last two weeks since I started with LLVM as I'm learning the particulars of the typing system for function calls in particular. > > It would be nice if it would tell you what expected signature was, what the value of i was so you know which parameter went wrong,

Hello all, I''m not sure who Camping''s steward is at this point(zimbatm? _why?), but I haven''t seen much activity in quite some time. I really like Camping, and I understand open source projects can fall by the wayside. So, I''d be willing to take over maintenance and releasing. I have experience maintaining my own open source projects, and a history of

Thanks for forwarding Jeffrey's tip Paul. Unfortunately, coming mostly from the application programming side, I haven't seriously used a command line debugger since the Apple IIe days in the early 80s (geez, i guess that makes me kinda old as far as programmers go). So I'm not familiar with gdb even at an intermediate level. Not that gdb isn't ubiquitous for tools development or

I have add the ssh key to my .ssh/authorized_files. When I enter the command, the errors are as follow. [root@mandrake91 .ssh]# rsync mandrake82::XXXXX /rsynctest --recursive -e ssh buffer_get: trying to get more bytes 129 than in buffer 46 rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so far) sync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(165) There is no errors when I

Hi, Here is the situation, I hope somebody can help me. Our Email server running ubuntu 8.04.1 and dovecot 1.0.10 rebooted, and when it came back up the dovecot config had changed. Prior to the reboot, users stored their emails and folders in /var/mail/~username. Then the config became /var/mail/username for the main Inbox and /home/~username/mail for Folders. Now, none of the folders

Hi, Now that --enable-experimental-targets build flags have been added to the build systems. What needs to be done in order to get the R600 backend added as an experimental target? I've posted an updated version of the backend to llvm-commits[1], that addresses many of the criticisms of the backend, but I haven't received any feedback, and I feel like the submission process has stalled.

Hi, I would like to try to keep the staging area discussion going. There seems to be a general consensus that a staging area for backends and also new features would be acceptable for the LLVM project. What actions are required to make the staging area a reality? Is more discussion needed? Is anyone willing to volunteer to be the "Code Owner" for the staging area, to help move the

here's an up-to-date patch, should apply to both openbsd and non-openbsd versions of openssh. i did only test ipv4 addresses. Index: channels.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/ssh/channels.c,v retrieving revision 1.191 diff -u -r1.191 channels.c --- channels.c 24 Jun 2003 08:23:46 -0000 1.191 +++ channels.c 25 Jun 2003 12:14:19

This is the 1st revision of the Advisory. This document can be found at: http://www.openssh.com/txt/buffer.adv 1. Versions affected: All versions of OpenSSH's sshd prior to 3.7 contain a buffer management error. It is uncertain whether this error is potentially exploitable, however, we prefer to see bugs fixed proactively. 2. Solution: Upgrade to OpenSSH