similar to: X11 forwarding after su'ing

>From netdev@oss.sgi.com: ----- Forwarded message from jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> ----- X-Original-To: sebek@localhost X-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 03:25:37 +0200 (CEST) Subject: (Long) ANNOUNCE: IMQ replacement WAS(Re: [RFC/PATCH] IMQ port to 2.6 From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca To: "Vladimir B. Savkin" <master@sectorb.msk.ru> Cc:

Hello i have some problems on 2.6.14 kernel dummy and iproute :) i have server with 2 nics : eth0 <> inet eth1 <> lan dummy0 (i want to shape incoming traffic from lan machine on this interface) my config: tc qdisc del dev dummy0 root tc qdisc add dev dummy0 root handle 1: htb tc class add dev dummy0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbit ceil 100kbit tc class add dev dummy0

No. Network Manager is always disabled on our builds since at least Cent5 days. The network stack has always been able to be managed properly without relying on Network Manager. Is that now an absolute requirement? It never has been prior. On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 6:26 PM Strahil Nikolov via CentOS <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > Have you tried to use NetworkManager ? > After

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1413 Bug ID: 1413 Summary: Inconsistent EBUSY errors when adding a duplicate element to a map Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

Requirement is a very strong word , but you should consider using it and here is a short demo why: - By default, RHEL uses NetworkManager to configure and manage network connections, and the /usr/sbin/ifup and /usr/sbin/ifdown scripts use NetworkManager to process ifcfg files in the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ directory. [root at system ~]# ls -l /usr/sbin/ifup lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 22 21

Have you tried to use NetworkManager ? After all ,anything network related should be done by it. [root at system ~]# nmcli connection add con-name dummy0 ifname dummy0 type dummy ? Connection 'dummy0' (9fdd74fa-c143-4991-9bac-0e542704ac89) successfully added. [root at system ~]# reboot Shared connection to glustera closed. [root at system ~]# uptime 03:23:44 up 0 min, ?1 user, ?load

A site I administer has dual T1''s. We have this set up according to NANO-HOWTO[1] using Julian''s routes patch on a late model 2.4 kernel. All is well, has been working well for a long time. Recently one of our T1 providers went belly up and we got something better. Now we have a /28 where previously we only used one IP per interface. Present interfaces: eth0 - T1#1, single

Whilst ip= command is documented to support dns0:dns1 options as arguments 7 and 8, the -d parser in ipconfig does not. This breaks bringing up static ip configuration with dns nameservers set in the ip= command. Testcase: $ ip link add name dummy0 type dummy $ sudo /usr/lib/klibc/bin/ipconfig -d 10.245.237.7::10.245.237.1:255.255.255.0:ottawa:dummy0:none:8.8.8.8:8.8.4.4 IP-Config: dummy0

Commit-ID: b86cd0ef3f225b0e68a7c49de2460829f6bfe2be Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=b86cd0ef3f225b0e68a7c49de2460829f6bfe2be Author: Dimitri John Ledkov <xnox at ubuntu.com> AuthorDate: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 22:18:23 +0100 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Sun, 28 Jul 2019 20:12:38 +0100 [klibc] ipconfig: Implement

Hello, I am using shorewall for about a day now :) and so far so good (it looks like a really great software). I have a question though I could not answer from the docs. I have a large set of hosts which will be used to limit access to SSH. Is there a way to ''group'' these under an alias and use it afterwards for setting rules? I thought about using an action.something for

Hello, I am having big problems with Xen virtual network interfaces. First I tried typical bridge support, no luck. The packets sent from dom0 to domU seemed to disappear somewhere. Then, to debug the problem I have set up a simple point-to-point link and still have the same problem. I am using Xen 3.0.4-1 and Linux 2.6.16.x in both dom0 and domU. I have tried kernel 2.6.16.35 and 2.6.16.41. I

Hello! I am using xen some years now and it just runs without any problems. But now one customer needs a stupid WinXP domU and I am trying to get this running for about two weeks... I am using 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 kernel, set up a dummy network auto dummy0 allow-hotplog dummy0 iface dummy0 inet static address 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.0.0.255 xend-config: (network-script

Hello all, I have been running xen for a while now with two interfaces: dummy0 for host only communication, and eth0 for the outside network. my script looks like this: (/etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge-more) ------------------------------------------------------------------ #! /bin/sh dir=$(dirname "$0") "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=dummy0

Hi chaps, host = laptop dom0 = debian testing domU = various problem = providing wireless to my domUs references = http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-5-manual/Virtualization-en-US/ch-virt-laptop-configurations.html That ref has been good so far in that a CentOS instance has got an IP with dummy0. host machine:- cat /etc/issue && cat /etc/network/interfaces Debian

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have a linux system with 4 ethernet interfaces, eth0 goes to the internet, eth1, eth2, and eth3 are NAT''d LANs. I want to use an ingress filter to prioritize bandwidth (downstream from internet) to various IPs. I want to sett it up something like this.... eth0 <--[NAT]--> dummy0 <---> dummy1 <---> eth1,eth2,eth3 dummy1

I am trying to configure load balancing for a couple of CentOS4 servers. In order to make it work, I need to add a hidden networking device on each server with the virtual IP. I found the following instructions on linuxvirtualserver.org for doing this, but they don't work. echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward ifconfig dummy0 0.0.0.0 up echo 1 >

Hello all, I have been running xen for a while now with two interfaces: dummy0 for host only communication, and eth0 for the outside network. my script looks like this: (/etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge-more) ------------------------------------------------------------------ #! /bin/sh dir=$(dirname "$0") "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 netdev=dummy0

Hi all, I am running Xen 3.0.2-2 (taken from XenSource) with Linux kernel 2.6.16 (taken from Debian Sid), I compiled Xen and 2 kernels (dom0 and domU). Here is the ascii-art of my setup: ------------ ------------- | LAN |------------------------| waste | 192.168.0.94/24 ------------ ------------- | ·····························

hello ! i try to use a network technology on one single host, which wasn`t designed for that. to give a short overview of what i`m talking about: AoE is just like a "networked blockdevice" (just like nbd/enbd) - but without tcp/ip. AoE kernel driver is the "client end" (see this like an iSCSI initiator) - and an etherblade storage appliance is the "server end"

Hi Folks: I have a strange problem with multiple (2) NICs on a CentOS 5.5 dom0 setup running xen 3.4.3 and have been struggling to fix it for some time. I could not find anything by googling or searching through this list but that is probably because I couldn''t figure out the correct search terms. After I configure my bridges the command "system network restart" fails for eth1