similar to: [Bug 518] _PATH_STDPATH can get redefined in includes.h if paths.h exists

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=518 Summary: _PATH_STDPATH can get redefined in includes.h if paths.h exists Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.5p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Build system AssignedTo:

Hello, Rsync 2.6.9 Mac OS interacting with Windows servers. My Rsync command: rsync -rvz --exclude-from=exclude.txt source destination. I copy large files from server A to server B excluding multiple directories which rsync quickly and beautifully executes. What I end up with at destination is these folders. 01_us_eng... 2_ASSETS 3_web 4_print I manually then move the

Can I define a variable in globals like this: [globals] timeout=60 and then in another context, redefine that same variable and only have the new value affect the call that hit that particular extension ? [example] exten => _9NXXXXXX,1,DBget(blah/blah) exten => _9NXXXXXX,102,Goto(3) exten => _9NXXXXXX,2,SetVar(#timeout=20) exten => _9NXXXXXX,3,Dial(${PSTN},${EXTEN:1},${timeout})

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1243 Summary: Multiple including of paths.h on AIX 5.1 systems. Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.4p1 Platform: All OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Build system AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org

>Why not exclude 2_ASSETS from the first run, and then do a second run to >rsync the _contents_ of 2_ASSETS to the target 01_us_eng directory? > >Add /01_us_eng/2_ASSETS/ to the exclude.txt file. > >rsync -rvz --exclude-from=exclude.txt source destination >rsync -rvz source/01_us_eng/2_ASSETS/ destination/01_us_eng/ > >(perhaps add some variation of the exclude.txt file

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1243 Kieron Curtis <cartmanltd at hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cartmanltd at hotmail.com --- Comment #2 from Kieron Curtis <cartmanltd at hotmail.com> 2007-05-31

I'm writing a package, and would appreciate advice on controlling the help documentation cross-references for a redefined generic. I wanted to define a cbind equivalent for an object that mostly behaves like a data frame. base::cbind dispatches to a data frame method if _any_ parameter is a data frame, so I defined a new S3 cbind and cbind.default to handle dispatch on first object only.

I''m trying to fully understand the subtleties of using alias_method_chain to refine method behavior versus redefining a method and calling super. I have a simple data model (a music collection) that I often use to evaluate web frameworks, and I''m trying to get it working on Rails 1.2.0RC1. Specifically, I have three classes which subclass a common Artist class: - Band

On 03/27/2014 06:31 PM, Herv? Pag?s wrote: > On 03/27/2014 02:13 AM, Ulrich Bodenhofer wrote: >> [...] >> >> For the time being, it seems I have three options: >> >> 1) not supplying the sort() function yet (it is not yet in the release, >> but only in my internal devel version) >> 2) including a dependency to BiocGenerics >> 3) leaving the

[cross-posted to R-devel and bioc-devel] Hi, I am trying to implement a 'sort' method in one of the CRAN packages I am maintaining ('apcluster'). I started with using setMethod("sort", ...) in my package, which worked fine. Since many users of my package are from the bioinformatics field, I want to ensure that my package works smoothly with Bioconductor. The problem

I have a Fedora Core 6 system on which I have built ruby 1.8.6 and rubygems 1.1.1 from source, and installed rails 2.0.2 using rubygems. When I create a new rails app, I get lots of errors that look like they''re coming from internal ruby libraries. Lots of methods redefined, as if I have some duplicate code somewhere. I also get errors when generating a simple model (see below.) I

Full_Name: Thomas Vogels Version: 0.64.1 OS: AIX 4.2 Submission from: (NULL) (198.133.22.70) R_problem_buf is defined, not just declared, in S.h: #define R_PROBLEM_BUFSIZE 4096 char R_problem_buf[R_PROBLEM_BUFSIZE]; This is bad since every time S.h is included this buffer is defined. The linker will eventually complain about multiple definitions of this symbol. Solution: declare

I fully agree, Michael, that this would be a great thing to have! I have often wondered why R and the standard packages are still sticking so much to the old-style S3 flavor though S4 is part of standard R. I acknowledge that backward compatibility is important, but, as far as I got it, redefining a function or S3 generic as an S4 generic should not harm existing functionality (if done

Hi rsync list! I have a problem with the exclude-from and include-from options. I want sync all jpeg files to an external server - exclude HK and texts folders and jpg inside this folders. My folder structure are: /products/ANYNAME/pictures/EU /products/ANYNAME/pictures/HK /products/ANYNAME/texts ... my include-from file: */ *.JPG *.jpg my exclude-from file: */HK/ */texts * my rsync

I'm running SIP between my Lucent TNT acting as a gateway, and an asterisk server. We have a PRI coming into the Lucent. Basically the problem I'm having is mostly on inbound calls but some outbound calls as well. I hear echo and sometimes some weird artifacting on calls coming in from the lucent. Everything routed over IAX to VoIP Jet or Nufone sounds fine. It seems like every 3

Hi! I'm messing about with an old Toshiba Tecra laptop. i've got wireless working well using NetworkManager and WEP. But I'm interested in finding out if it is possible to get WPA/TKIP or other WPA variants to work with that driver. According to dmesg, boottime diagnostics include: eth0: Hardware identity 0005:0004:0005:0000 eth0: Station identity 001f:0001:0008:000a eth0: firmware

Does Asterisk work with Lucent or any other PBX phone systems????

Hello. I am porting Splus library to R, which use S "graphics.h" and "device.h", the library makes a number of high resolution plots using these. Does anyone have an experience with similar porting? I don't really want to rewrite all C code, so any recommendation would be helpful. Thanks. --------------------------- Vadim Kutsyy vadim at kutsyy.com

On 03/27/2014 02:13 AM, Ulrich Bodenhofer wrote: > I fully agree, Michael, that this would be a great thing to have! I have > often wondered why R and the standard packages are still sticking so > much to the old-style S3 flavor though S4 is part of standard R. I > acknowledge that backward compatibility is important, but, as far as I > got it, redefining a function or S3 generic as

Currently, RTP IP have to be the same as SIP IP. But, SIP RFC allows RTP to use different IP as SIP ip. Is there any way to configure it? GUI or CLI? or , will we support it in future? Thanks. -- Rgds, -- Rgds, Hans Yin Web: homeofhans.homeip.net Email: hansyin at gmail.com MSN: hansyin at hotmail.com Skype: hans_yin_vancouver