similar to: 3.6 portable ready.

Hi All. After one false start, I now have a Tinderbox up and running for the OpenSSH portable tree. For those not familiar with it, Tinderbox is a tool for automatically displaying the status of builds and tests. At the moment, I do 1 update and 4 builds hourly. It's not fully functional yet but the basics work. It can be found at http://dodgynet.dyndns.org/tinderbox/OpenSSH_Portable/ (I

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418 dirk.meyer at dinoex.sub.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Miscellaneous |Build system ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the

http://www.mindrot.org/~djm/openssh/openssh-newpam-20030123.tar.gz Is a snapshot of the new PAM-via-KbdInt authentication support from FreeBSD's OpenSSH tree. Please test this now. I can only surmise by the silence that has greeted my previous requests for testing that the code works perfectly. -d

There are a couple of noteworthy changes in tonight's snapshot: 1. New UsePAM directive There is a new sshd_config directive, UsePAM for systems built using "configure --with-pam". This allows one to switch off all PAM calls from sshd. This is handy if one builds with PAM but wants to use the sshd's ability to run as a non-root user. Previously this was impossible if one

TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:11 - starting RELENG_4 tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:11 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_4 src TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:11 - /usr/bin/cvs returned exit code 1 TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:11 - ERROR: unable to check out the source tree TB ---

TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:12 - starting RELENG_4 tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:12 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/pc98 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_4 src TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:12 - /usr/bin/cvs returned exit code 1 TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:12 - ERROR: unable to check out the source tree TB ---

TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:11 - starting RELENG_4 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:11 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_4 src TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:11 - /usr/bin/cvs returned exit code 1 TB --- 2003-08-09 16:00:11 - ERROR: unable to check out the source tree TB ---

TB --- 2008-08-27 11:26:00 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-08-27 11:26:00 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2008-08-27 11:26:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-08-27 11:26:30 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-08-27 11:26:30 - /usr/bin/csup -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s /tinderbox/RELENG_7/amd64/amd64/supfile TB --- 2008-08-27

We are heading into a lock here. So we need to get people to test their respective platforms if they wish them to be supported out of the tar file. So if you have any patches you need to ensure your platform works speak up. We are looking at a lock on the 17th. I believe I have an AIX/Cray patch and a Tru64 patch sitting in my mailbox that I'll be looking at soon and more than likely

TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:14 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:14 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:14 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:32 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:32 - /usr/bin/csup -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s /tinderbox/RELENG_7/sparc64/sparc64/supfile TB ---

TB --- 2013-11-25 17:30:12 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-11-25 17:30:12 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r243825: Tue Dec 4 09:23:10 UTC 2012 root at farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013-11-25 17:30:12 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2013-11-25 17:30:12 -

TB --- 2012-12-04 23:10:18 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-12-04 23:10:18 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 root at farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-12-04 23:10:18 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2012-12-04 23:10:18 - cleaning

TB --- 2013-11-13 13:00:41 - tinderbox 2.20 running on worker01.tb.des.no TB --- 2013-11-13 13:00:41 - FreeBSD worker01.tb.des.no 9.1-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p4 #0: Mon Jun 17 11:42:37 UTC 2013 root at amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013-11-13 13:00:41 - starting RELENG_10 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2013-11-13 13:00:41 - cleaning the

TB --- 2008-06-03 08:42:30 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-06-03 08:42:30 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2008-06-03 08:42:30 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-06-03 08:43:09 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-06-03 08:43:09 - /usr/bin/csup -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s /tinderbox/RELENG_6/i386/i386/supfile TB --- 2008-06-03 08:43:22

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314 ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2002-10-21 10:40 ------- What existing headers? If the system provides its own readpassphrase() we should need the local copy. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2008-07-08-0003/ http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2008-07-08-0003/logs/xf86-video-nouveau/#build nouveau_bo.c: In function 'nouveau_bo_new': nouveau_bo.c:51: error: 'NOUVEAU_MEM_TILE' undeclared (first use in this function) nouveau_bo.c:51: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once nouveau_bo.c:51: error: for each function it appears in.)

TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - tinderbox 2.20 running on worker01.tb.des.no TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - FreeBSD worker01.tb.des.no 9.1-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p4 #0: Mon Jun 17 11:42:37 UTC 2013 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - starting RELENG_10 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - cleaning the

TB --- 2013-10-31 19:50:43 - tinderbox 2.20 running on worker01.tb.des.no TB --- 2013-10-31 19:50:43 - FreeBSD worker01.tb.des.no 9.1-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p4 #0: Mon Jun 17 11:42:37 UTC 2013 root at amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013-10-31 19:50:43 - starting RELENG_10 tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2013-10-31 19:50:43 - cleaning the

TB --- 2013-02-26 21:23:55 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-26 21:23:55 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58 UTC 2012 mdtancsa at freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2013-02-26 21:23:55 - starting RELENG_9 tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2013-02-26 21:23:55 - cleaning the

On the one hand, yes, they're about things most readers can't do anything about. On the other hand, they do let you know (once the tinderbox has stabilized, this being a new setup with the bugs being worked out of it) whether recent -STABLE will build or not, which can be quite useful even for ordinary users of -STABLE. (You know to hold off on updating if it's failing for your