similar to: Suggestion: Disable PrivilegeSepartion by default

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Suggestion: Disable PrivilegeSepartion by default"

2002 Apr 24
1
hostbased authentication and the root account
We have a problem using hostbased authentication in combination with the root account. We use hostbased authentication to hop from a 'management server' where we use strong authentication to several systems in a cluster. The management server is defined in shosts.equiv and the public key of this server is defined in ssh_known_hosts. This setup works for all users except for the root user
2002 Jul 14
3
[Bug 125] with BSM auditing, cron editing thru ssh session causes cron jobs to fail
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125 ------- Additional Comments From jrj at purdue.edu 2002-07-14 13:31 ------- Created an attachment (id=131) Update of bug #2 patch to 3.4p1 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
2002 Dec 10
2
OpenSSH 3.5p1 and BSM for Solaris
Can someone help me get BSM working with Solaris 8 and OpenSSH 3.5p1? I saw the patch here for OpenSSH 3.4p1, but do not know how to apply it to OpenSSH 3.4p1 nor do I feel comfortable modifying to work with OpenSSH 3.5p1: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org Is this patch needed to fix the BSM crontab issue only, or is it required for BSM auditing in general? Jeff
2005 Aug 29
4
Conflict between LDAP and Privilege Separation?
Hi all. OpenSSH_4.1p1, OpenSSL 0.9.7g 11 Apr 2005 on Solaris 8 using host-based authentication. With "PrivilegeSeparation yes" and "UsePAM no" everything works as desired. If I enable PAM, I am able to connect, but just before it gives me a shell, it disconnects. If I leave PAM enabled and disable PrivilegeSeparation, it works. Is this a current limitation, or is there
2002 Apr 11
3
[Bug 2] sshd should have BSM auditing on Solaris
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 Michael.Gerdts at alcatel.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Michael.Gerdts at alcatel.com ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are
2004 Sep 01
2
openssh-3.9p1: no pam_close_session() invocation
Hello, I would like to point to this problem again as I have not seen a reply to my original posting: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix-dev&m=106458208520320&w=2 and the problem still exists in version 3.9p1. After closing a ssh-session the pam_close_session() function is not invoked. Enabling PrivilegeSeparation (UsePrivilegeSeparation yes) does not help. Could someone
2002 Dec 19
1
OpenUsePrivilegeSeparation on Compaq V5.1A with C2/SIA Security
I'm using OpenSSH_3.5p1 (server protocol 2.0 ) on a Compaq device V5.1A with C2 Security (SIA) configured. I must set UsePrivilegeSeparation to no to get this working. Does anyone have PrivilegeSeparation working on a Compaq device with C2 Security configured? Source device: ssh user at destination ( produces these errors) sshd: /var/tcb/files/__db_lock.share: Permission denied sshd:
2006 Mar 10
1
PrivSep and PAM environment variable setting
I think I've seen this come up before, but I couldn't find an answer in the archives. I'm trying to use the PAM "pam_mail.so" module on Linux to set the MAIL environment variable (so I don't have to try to do it in various shell init scripts), but the MAIL setting doesn't get passed through unless I disable PrivilegeSeparation. Is there a way to have PAM set
2002 Jul 03
2
--{enable/disable}-suid-ssh removed, rhosts auth gone when UID != 0
Hi, According to ChangeLog someone "(bal)" removed -{enable/disable}-suid-ssh from configure (dating from 2002/06/07). Don't know the reason, probably this has something to do with PrivilegeSeparation. Consequence is: Users with UID != 0 are no longer able to allocate privileged ports, sshd answers "Rhosts Authentication disabled, originating port will not be
2005 May 03
5
[Bug 1029] SIGTERM and cleanup of wtmp files
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1029 Summary: SIGTERM and cleanup of wtmp files Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.0p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: senthilkumar_sen
2005 Jan 24
15
[Bug 125] add BSM audit support
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125 alex.bell at bt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alex.bell at bt.com ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the
2003 Dec 02
1
Sun Kerberos Password Expiration Problems with OpenSSH 3.7.1p2
I am running Solaris 8 with the Basic Security Module (BSM) loaded and Sun's Enterprise Authentication Mechanism (SEAM) installed. Our servers are using Sun One Directory Services (LDAP) for authorization and Sun's Kerberos 5 implementation for authentication. We have been using OpenSSH 3.4p1 with OpenSSL 0.9.6f and everything has been working fine. We are updating our OpenSSH and OpenSSL
2014 Dec 04
3
Adding Solaris Audit to sshd (and sftp-server)
Hi Damien, I'm working with the Solaris team that is integrating openssh into upcoming Solaris releases. I'm looking for advice from the upstream community. You were suggested for that advice. If there are other mailing lists you'd like me to ask, I'm happy to do so, or if you'd like to forward, please feel free to do so. The --with-audit=bsm (audit-bsm.c) configuration
2003 Jan 03
1
OpenSSH, Solaris 8, and BSM works with BSM patch, but must disable privilege separation
To get BSM working on Solaris 8 with OpenSSH, I did this: Download John R. Jackson's OpenSSH 3.5p1 BSM patch here, and save as "patch.tar.gz": http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125 (NOTE TO OpenSSH DEVELOPERS, can you incorporate this patch into the next version of OpenSSH?) Installing the OpenSSH 3.5p1 BSM patch: ?-------------------------------------- Turning on Sun BSM
2011 Mar 08
3
This is supposed to predict a time series?!
Hello, I just ran the predict.StructTS function using the AirPassengers data and got a ridiculous result. Here's what I ended up with: http://24.210.155.111/PredictWhat!.pdf Who wrote this? Am I seriously supposed to think this function would accurately predict a time series? -AnalogKid
2004 Dec 20
6
[Bug 125] add BSM audit support
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #647 is|0 |1 obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2004-12-20 16:24 -------
2005 Jan 26
1
OpenSSH and BSM
All, I've recently received a requirement to implement OpenSSH on a Solaris server with BSM enabled. Checking through the list archive suggests that the patch Darren's patch is almost ready but requires testing & perhaps fine-tuning. Can someone please let me know what the status is and if any assistance is required with testing I'm happy to offer an extra pair of hands. Thanks
2006 Sep 30
1
audit-bsm.c lacks <errno.h>
#include <errno.h> was removed from includes.h in July: ---------------------------- revision 1.113 date: 2006/07/12 12:22:46; author: dtucker; state: Exp; lines: +1 -2 - stevesk at cvs.openbsd.org 2006/07/11 20:07:25 [scp.c auth.c monitor.c serverloop.c sftp-server.c sshpty.c readpass.c sshd.c monitor_wrap.c monitor_fdpass.c ssh-agent.c ttymodes.c atomicio.c includes.h
2009 Dec 13
4
any use of flash causing "stack level too deep"
Is there any way to clear what''s in there? This happens any time flash[] is in my code. It can be setting or reading a value. I''ve tried commenting out all uses of flash in my code to get a few different pages to load, thinking this would clear the values, but no luck. If I get into the debugger, a p flash or pp flash will give a ''Stack level too deep'' error
2007 Jun 02
1
Problem with the command "StrucTS" that fits a basic structural model for time series
Hi everybody, I'am very interested with the basic structural model of time series. So I used the command "StructTS" but I failed to obtain a desirable output, in fact when I write in R Console the following lines: > x=(1,2,3,4,5,2,25,14,12,13,11,6,9,24,12,13,14,12,12,14,11,12,14,15,20,21,22,23,21,25,28) >(fit <- StructTS(x,type = "BSM")) I obtained the following