similar to: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and action t aken.

Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content. Place = ; ; Sender = samba@samba.org Subject = Delivery Time = November 21, 1999 (Sunday) 01:12:30 Policy = Anti-Spam Action on this mail = Quarantine message Warning message from administrator: Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail. -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has taken action on the message, please refer to the contents of this message for further details. Sender = saulo@capebe.org.br Recipient(s) = samba@samba.org; Subject = [Samba] Samba HP-UX 10.20 Scanning Time = 12/12/2002 17:54:32 Engine/Pattern = 6.150-1001/410 Action on message: The attachment CPD_ CAPEBE.vcf matched file blocking settings. ScanMail has taken

related to RST-based close in one case? can someone investigate or dup? ----- Forwarded message from marco.ortisi at flashcom.it ----- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:49:30 GMT From: marco.ortisi at flashcom.it To: Kevin Steves <stevesk at pobox.com> Subject: Re: bug on openssh 3.5p1 Excuse me for delay...i have much work in this time...then >can you post to the list? i don't have

Excuse me in advance for my poor english I have noted a small bug on OpenSSH 3.5p1. When user root is not permitted to log in a system (PermitRoot no) and a correct password is submitted for it to server, a RST packet is issued from server to client: [root at xxx root]# ssh victim root at victim's password: Permission denied, please try again. root at victim's password: Permission

When sshd is not running as root on linux with pam we recieve error like this fatal: monitor_read: unsupported request: 24

syslinux-bounces at zytor.com Reason the mail was blocked: Lottery Hoax Scanned by ScanMail for Lotus Notes 2.6 with scanengine 6.860-1001 and patternfile lpt$vpn.840

We're seeing an issue with 1.2.12 where over-quota rejection messages are appearing in the logs with <> as the sender. The sender of the original message sees the appropriate sender (postmaster@) on the rejection, but as the message makes its way through the postfix/amavis chain, I can see that the sender address is missing. Aug 20 10:55:56 inet1 amavis[21822]: [ID 702911

Hi, I'm having a problem getting my Windows machines to access shares in Samba. When they browse to the Samba box it sometimes gives them an error saying that they don't have permission or that the server is unavailable. However this doesn't always happen and other times it lists the shares. When I try to access the shares it just prompts for the username/password over and over.

Does anyone have any experience with running asterisk on multi-processor computers (dual or quad)? Does asterisk on the latest Linux distros take advantage of the extra processors, or does it predominately utilize a single processor?

I have two mailer procedures in the same app and same mailer (Rails 3.1/1.9.2). The first one fails with the message below, the second works fine. Both these results are through irb. Anyone have an idea as to why? Also, in my application.rb I do have: ActionMailer::Base.default :from => "WaveLineup <system-+T6PWOEcvEy41k5uCYKmRQ@public.gmane.org>" defined. FAILS def

This is the SMTP Server program at host orange.fr. I''m sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be be delivered to one or more recipients. It''s attached below. For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster> If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The SMTP Server

Hi, I''m having a problem with Milter-Sender (v0.62) in the fact that I''m not able to tune the GreyListRejectCount the way that I want to. Namely I''m having a problem setting the GreyListRejectCount to any value higher than a single digit, or at least that''s what I think is happening. I''ve been ""fighting this problem for a while on my server

sending mail to samba-unsubscribe@us5.samba.org is looping/bouncing ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Medi Montaseri medi@CyberShell.com Unix Distributed Systems Engineer HTTP://www.CyberShell.com CyberShell Engineering ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Forwarded

Sender, E-mmunity has detected virus(es) in your e-mail attachment(s). Method: Mail Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:20:53 -0700 (PDT) From: rsync@samba.org To: jfparadis@mec.ca Subject: Let's be friends Virus Name: W32.Klez.E@mm File Attachment: sola a.pif Attachment Status: deleted

What''s the directors'' take on ading DKIM or SPF functionality into ActionMailer. Is that a function that is better addressed via a plugin, or would an extension or a monkeypatch of this class be an appropriate avenue of pursuit? Steven --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on

Incident Information:- Database: d:/lotus/domino/data/mail1.box Originator: samba@samba.org Recipients: sphraprc@spower.com.sg Subject: Mail Delivery (failure sphraprc@spower.com.sg) Date/Time: 10/03/2005 07:10:01 PM This is a system-generated notification from Singapore Power Ltd. Your message sent to sphraprc@spower.com.sg has been filtered because it contains either virus attachment or

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > tags 448788 moreinfo Bug#448788: postfix/postgrey: "Sender address rejected: " are not filtered out There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. Delivery failed for the following recipients(s): jtai@altera.com The message you sent contained an attachment which the recipient has chosen to block. Usually these sort of attachments are blocked to prevent malicious software from being sent to the recipient in question. The name(s) of the blocked file(s) follow:

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: qdory0m2 at mail.ru account is disabled ------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------ Return-path: <logcheck-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org>

This is the mail system at host mail1.ardenthealth.com. I''m sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. It''s attached below. For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster. If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The mail