similar to: CVS Tags

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 60000 matches similar to: "CVS Tags"

2015 Mar 17
1
strategies to run two NT4 domains or merge them on one samba host
Hi, we currently run one samba v3.0 domain "DOMAIN30" with WinXP domain members and Win7/8 accessing the file server without domain membership. Then we run a second samba v3.5 domain "NEWDOMAIN" with WinXP/7/8 domain members. Which was migrated from a NT4 PDC to samba 3.0 and to v3.5 eventually. Neither domain has anything fancy about it: users and joined workstations,
2018 Jun 13
1
r-base-dev not installing in Ubuntu 16.04
On 13 June 2018 at 20:54, Robin Lovelace wrote: | I have recently re-installed R on my Ubuntu system to get R 3.5 and found | this to have worked: | | # you may need to remove incumbent repos e.g. with: | sudo apt-add-repository --remove ppa:marutter/rrutter | | # add new repos | sudo apt-add-repository ppa:marutter/rrutter3.5 # for base R | sudo apt-add-repository ppa:marutter/c2d4u4.5 # for
2004 Aug 10
2
Newbie about Mbox or Maildir
Hi, Thanks in advance. I am not sure if my system is setup to use 'mbox' or 'maildir'. How do I find this out? I am running an OpenBSD (v3.5) box with an Intel P3 motherboard. I have installed the OpenBSD port of Dovecot (0.99.10) and have manually started dovecot and configured the ssl certificates as per the documentation. As far as I can tell there is no problems but I am
2010 Aug 22
1
Is "samba3_vscan" compiled anymore, by anyone?
I'm looking at the RPM's over at http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.5/, and noticing that the "samba3-vscan" package is not being built for any OS. Is this deliberate? If so, perhaps it can be deleted from the SRPM? It no longer builds correctly for Samba v3.5, and is a years old virus scanning tool in any case. It's therefore probably unsuitable for virus scanning of any
2012 Aug 04
1
[bisected] nouveau: "Failed to idle channel x" after resume
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 18:25 +0300, Aioanei Rares wrote: > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Martin Nyhus <martin.nyhus at gmx.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:18:42 +0200 Martin Nyhus wrote: > > > after resuming from suspend nouveau starts writing Failed to idle > > > channel x (where x is 2 or 3) to the log and X appears to stop and > > >
2002 Nov 02
3
OpenSSH CVS
Hello I am trying to get some fixes that are in the OpenSSH CVS 3.5 branch I am having trouble figuring out the CVS tags that you guys use, could someone please tell me what the CVS tag for the 3.5 branch is and what you use as standards?? like cvs co -r OpenSSH_V_3_5 openssh should work but doesnt so what do you use as your tags.... Thanks again Donnie Cranford Senior Unix Systems Admin
2016 Feb 25
1
Building with LLVM_PARALLEL_XXX_JOBS
> Which combination of cmake/ninja versions are you using (latest are > v3.4.3 and v1.6.0)? > With this combination I could reduce build-time down from approx. 3h down to 01h20m. $ egrep -i 'jobs|ninja' llvm-build/CMakeCache.txt //Program used to build from build.ninja files. CMAKE_MAKE_PROGRAM:FILEPATH=/opt/cmake/bin/ninja //Define the maximum number of concurrent compilation
2016 Mar 01
2
Building with LLVM_PARALLEL_XXX_JOBS
> On Mar 1, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Chris Bieneman <cbieneman at apple.com> wrote: > > There are a few notes I'd like to add to this thread. > > (1) we have a number of places throughout out CMake build where we use features from newer CMakes gated by version checks. Most of these features are performance or usability related. None of them are correctness. Using the latest
2016 Mar 01
2
Building with LLVM_PARALLEL_XXX_JOBS
For faster builds and rebuilds you should definitely read: https://blogs.s-osg.org/an-introduction-to-accelerating-your-build-with-clang/ https://blogs.s-osg.org/a-conclusion-to-accelerating-your-build-with-clang/ Hope this helps! On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 9:17 PM, ChrisBieneman via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On Mar 1, 2016, at 10:01 AM, Mehdi Amini
2017 Dec 30
3
No tags in the Git mirrors
On 2017-12-30 21:27, Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev wrote: > Hello > > We are not planning to use git tags there (at least until the git > migration would happen). Please use the release branches. To me it doesn't matter if it's a tag or a branch, but, as far as I can see, there are no branches for point releases. For example, there's a branch release_50, but no branch
2018 Jun 13
3
r-base-dev not installing in Ubuntu 16.04
Hello All, When I try to install r-base-dev on my Ubuntu 16.04 it gives me the following error r-base-dev : Depends: dh-r but it is not installable E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. I added the following two repos deb https://mirrors.ebi.ac.uk/CRAN/bin/linux/ubuntu xenial-cran35 deb http://uk-mirrors.evowise.com/ubuntu/ bionic-backports main restricted universe but
2017 Sep 14
2
special latin1 do not print as glyphs in current devel on windows
This is a follow-up on my initial posts regarding character encodings on Windows (https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2017-August/074728.html) and Patrick Perry's reply (https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2017-August/074830.html) in particular (thank you for the links and the bug report!). My initial posts were quite chaotic (and partly wrong), so I am trying to clear things up a
2007 Apr 02
0
[LLVMdev] CVS Branches To Discard?
Reed, Can the "see" branch be renamed "SVA", for Secure Virtual Architecture? This is the new name of the LLVA system and project. It uses LLVM as the instruction set and compiler infrastructure. Thanks, --Vikram http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ On Apr 2, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Reid Spencer wrote: > All, > > We are considering removing some
2007 Apr 02
1
[LLVMdev] CVS Branches To Discard?
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 13:30 -0500, Vikram S. Adve wrote: > Reed, > > Can the "see" branch be renamed "SVA", for Secure Virtual > Architecture? This is the new name of the LLVA system and project. > It uses LLVM as the instruction set and compiler infrastructure. Yes, we can do that. I'll add it to the conversion script. > > Thanks, > >
2014 May 12
3
[LLVMdev] Point Releases - tags
I've just read about the 3.4.1 point release, but there seems to be no way to track these in the Git archives, no tags, no branches. Am I missing something? Bas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140512/295256a1/attachment.html>
2007 Apr 02
5
[LLVMdev] CVS Branches To Discard?
All, We are considering removing some branches and tags in the conversion process from CVS to SVN. We don't want to do this in a vaccuum, so please read carefully. A deficiency in the cvs2svn script causes it to bloat the Subversion repository (significantly, as in 10x) in the conversion of branches and tags. We can minimize the impact of this by only keeping branches and tags that we really
2005 Aug 15
1
CVS branches?
Just curious about the use of branches in CVS on Alioth. I see the r2_0_1, v2_0_* and v2_1_0 branches, but what does the trunk represent? (sorry if this has been covered before, but I didn't see it in the archives.) -- - Charles Lepple
2013 Dec 15
0
[Bug 58378] [NV86] Distorted graphics on NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G after upgrade the kernel to 3.7.0 version
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58378 --- Comment #31 from Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- You really need to figure out how to do things inside the git tree and not do some sort of crazy export. That will speed things up by an order of magnitude. To get the list of nouveau changes between 3.4 and 3.5: git log v3.4..v3.5 -- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau To do a bisect
2013 Dec 15
0
[Bug 58378] [NV86] Distorted graphics on NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G after upgrade the kernel to 3.7.0 version
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58378 --- Comment #35 from Andreas Loew <awl1 at gmx.net> --- Follow-up question note that I am digging deeper into git... ;-) >From the commits in the v3.4..v3.5 range, only two of them: 9bd0c15fcfb42f6245447c53347d65ad9e72080b (dated Jun 26, 2012) and e9bf5f36b09f8ec6c168ef58ee7d4890545ede1c (dated Jun 27) when looking at the global
2012 Jul 25
9
Regression in kernel 3.5 as Dom0 regarding PCI Passthrough?!
Hi! i notice a serious regression with 3.5 as Dom0 kernel (3.4 was rock stable): 1st: only the GPU PCI Passthrough works, the PCI USB Controller is not recognized within the DomU (HVM Win7 64) Dom0 cmdline is: ro root=LABEL=dom0root xen-pciback.hide=(08:00.0)(08:00.1)(00:1d.0)(00:1d.1)(00:1d.2)(00:1d.7) security=apparmor noirqdebug nouveau.msi=1 Only 8:00.0 and 8:00.1 get passed through