similar to: [Bug 3] sshd does not properly daemonize itself

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 70000 matches similar to: "[Bug 3] sshd does not properly daemonize itself"

2001 Nov 10
1
[Bug 3] sshd does not properly daemonize itself
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3 ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2001-11-11 05:51 ------- isn't your software distribution program broken if it exec()s sshd without closing filedescriptors that might cause it break? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
2002 Aug 04
0
[Bug 3] sshd does not properly daemonize itself
http://cvs-mirror.mozilla.org/webtools/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3 stevesk at pobox.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From stevesk at
2002 Sep 28
0
Portability patch for regression tests
Hi All, As threatened, I have rolled up the various portability patches for the regression tests. Assuming all is well, running the tests is as simple as "make tests", although some platforms (eg AIX) require "SUDO=sudo" first. I took the tests from OpenBSD CVS written by Markus and incorporated the patches written by Roumen Petrov and myself as well as various suggestions
2000 Apr 26
1
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix-dev&m=95669367427640&w=2 (fwd)
-- | "Bombay is 250ms from New York in the new world order" - Alan Cox | Damien Miller - http://www.mindrot.org/ | Email: djm at mindrot.org (home) -or- djm at ibs.com.au (work) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 19:55:56 -0600 (MDT) From: Theo de Raadt <deraadt at cvs.openbsd.org> To: djm at cvs.openbsd.org, markus at cvs.openbsd.org, provos at
2002 Mar 22
3
[Bug 179] sshd sends channel data after sending EOF
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-03-22 22:37 ------- hm, sshd is not sending channel data after
2001 Oct 22
2
[Bug 3] sshd fails to close open file descriptors when forking
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2001-10-23
2003 Jan 26
1
[Bug 132] connects to 1.2.2? vintage sshd sometimes gets "Server lies" about host key size off by 1 bit
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|markus at openbsd.org |openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are
2002 Mar 18
0
[Bug 173] New: sshd does not listen on tcp-socket, though GatewayPorts yes
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=173 Summary: sshd does not listen on tcp-socket, though GatewayPorts yes Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.1p1 Platform: UltraSparc OS/Version: SunOS Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo:
2002 Oct 17
0
[Bug 416] problems with sshd starting up and hostkeys
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-10-18
2002 Oct 15
0
[Bug 414] New: sshd initially ignores -e (log_stderr) if -i (inetd_flag) is given
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414 Summary: sshd initially ignores -e (log_stderr) if -i (inetd_flag) is given Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All URL: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix- dev&m=102469253706346&w=2 OS/Version: Linux
2002 Nov 05
2
[Bug 414] sshd initially ignores -e (log_stderr) if -i (inetd_flag) is given
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414 ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-11-06 07:01 ------- Created an attachment (id=164) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=164&action=view) proposed patch what about this? (more in line with the rest of the code). ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the
2001 Jul 04
0
Sneek peak at what was commited.
For those following the portable CVS tree.. I'd suggest holding off for a day or so unless you really want to get dirty. I just commited 32 patches from the OpenBSD tree, but have not worked out all the issues (due to Linux brain damage <sigh..Faster OpenBSD gets SMP..the happer I'll be>). The two things that need to be finished integrated in the configure.in is KRB5 and
2000 May 09
1
2.9: remote port forwarding doesn't work
Hello, I'm running OpenBSD 2.9 (-rOPENBSD_2_9) on i386. Remote port forwarding doesn't work. Attached are 2 logs of ssh -v -R2828:localhost:22 localhost and sshd -p 2222 -d Note that server tries to forward to Connection to port 2828 forwarding to 0.0.0.0 port 0 requested. instead of localhost port 22 as it should. what ssh, what sshd and /etc/sshd_config are also attached. Thanks
2003 May 12
0
[Bug 502] sshd fails when "Compression yes" set on HPUX
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502 ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2003-05-12 19:12 ------- Is there an older libz in you library path? Mark Janssen reported an identical problem (all the way down to the number after "alloc") which was solved by recompiling zlib. See: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix-dev&m=104487220204506
2007 Jan 17
0
login_get_lastlog - nss enviornment - works in shell env, doesn't work when sshd calls it.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello to every one! Maybe this is not exactly the right place, but I don't know where to ask, so... I have a FreeBSD-6-STABLE machine, setuped with custom nss lib which reads from pgsql database. It seems to be working just fine except that I can't login trought ssh, when trying the normal method. When I do $>ssh host.com tcsh I get
2003 Sep 16
3
OpenSSH 3.7.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=106375452423794&w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=106375456923804&w=2 Does this affect FreeBSD? - -Justin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/Z7QbdYQBw9Ox1VgRAsb2AJ0eZxI/s3Q5KJQxvgROLM8FnU1kiQCfSsma XcJ/R/6s9yQJwBTYDeWI2+Y= =BoVH
2003 Nov 13
1
SSHD password authentication issue in 4.9-RELEASE and 5.1-RELEASE
Wonder if you guys could help me out...have a security problem with sshd wich enables a user to do a password login tough the sshd_config states PasswordAuthentication no My config works fine in both gentoo and openbsd 3.3 but users are able to login with tunneled clear text passwords in both 4.9 and 5.1 Im lost.tried everything I can think of. Here is the config:
2000 Nov 29
0
Snapshot
I have just uploaded a new snapshot to http://www.mindrot.org/misc/openssh/ Snapshot production is now automated - new snapshots will be made at about 4:30 am (Australian Eastern time) and will be available from the URL above. This snapshot consists of mainly minor fixes over the previous. The race when sshd exits which was causing data loss (as evidenced by "ssh localhost dd
2002 Feb 18
4
[Bug 120] sshd fails pty chown() when run as non-root userid
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120 ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-02-19 04:29 ------- can you allocate ptys as non-root? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
2003 Jun 04
3
[Bug 396] sshd orphans processes when no pty allocated
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2003-06-05 00:09 ------- sending signals could be dangerous, depending on the permissions of the sending process, e.g. a root-owned sshd sending to a setuid process. but i'm not sure. we had similar code there before. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the