similar to: [Bug 384] OpenSSH should store an SSH_SERVER variable for cluster hosts

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "[Bug 384] OpenSSH should store an SSH_SERVER variable for cluster hosts"

2002 Aug 13
0
[Bug 384] New: OpenSSH should store an SSH_SERVER variable for cluster hosts
http://cvs-mirror.mozilla.org/webtools/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=384 Summary: OpenSSH should store an SSH_SERVER variable for cluster hosts Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P4 Component: ssh
2012 Oct 10
2
ssh over udp (or: -L option listening for traffic with a UDP service?)
All, A bit of background: I work on a QA API on a network that is very choppy (a lot of network interrupts), and we use ssh to do a large part of this automation. This leads to some problems: ssh connections seem to be sensitive to network state, becoming unusable if the choppiness reaches a certain threshold, and either timing out or disconnecting if this happens. Anyways, I stumbled across
2006 Aug 25
2
RFC: non-root ssh tun access
The attached patch is against openssh-4.3_p2 to allow non-root users to vpn in over ssh. root access is still needed on client side (or an sudo solution). Currently, I have it working with an sudo command to configure a tap interface on the server side. eg to ssh into my gentoo server: # ssh -fw any:any user at ssh_server.box "sudo /etc/init.d/net.tap0 restart" Then, configure the
2002 Sep 04
4
Determining Local IP Address within .profile
Hi ! I haven't found an easy solution to determine the local IP to which the remote SSH client is connected to the local SSHD. We use MC/Serviceguard which can create many Interfaces where a remote client could connect and we like to know within .profile which interface the client has connected to. I've looked at the sourcecode and maybe the following could do something I described :
2007 Apr 04
5
sshkey
Hello all, How are you using the sshkey type? Are you using it to list hosts and keys in a class that nodes include in order to manage /etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts or something else? How does any of this relate to the sshrsakey and sshdsakey facts on the host? I read some stuff about this on the Virtual Resources page but it''s too vague for my simple mind and I''d be reluctant to use
2011 Jul 10
1
Problems In New "Pro Puppet" Book
I should first say that I''m a complete beginner to Puppet so some of what I saw below could be incorrect. "Pro Puppet" is a pretty good book so far but it really should have had another editing step to correct the problems I''ve mentioned below. Here are the problems I''ve found so far. Some of these are embarrassingly trivial but some are true mistakes. I
2008 Nov 13
5
ogg dirac granulepos in oggz tools
Hi, I'm wondering if the Dirac granulepos parsing in liboggz and display in the oggz tools is currently correct, as I'd like to do a release of these soon. A couple of days ago David Schleef mentioned there were some problems. David, is that currently true (ie. since David Flynn's recent updates to support Dirac), and if so could you please explain what the problems are, or point me
2008 Nov 14
6
[Schrodinger-devel] ogg dirac granulepos in oggz tools
2008/11/14 David Flynn <davidf+nntp at woaf.net>: > On 2008-11-13, Conrad Parker <conrad at metadecks.org> wrote: >> I'm wondering if the Dirac granulepos parsing in liboggz and display >> in the oggz tools is currently correct, as I'd like to do a release of >> these soon. > > I believe it is -- although if correct support in the rest of the >
2008 Aug 16
2
Fwd: final changes to mimetypes rfc
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > The IETF has a final draft of our RFC at > ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/authors/rfc5334.txt (yes, it goes > from 3534 to 5334 - funny!). Didn't we decide YUV4MPEG should be 8 octets as well? -r
2008 Jun 06
3
How Ogg mappings translate into the codecs parameter in Ogg media types
Hi all, I am trying to set up the codecs table in the wiki and we have played a bit with Dirac to find out what existing tools write into the header. The Schroedinger implementation by Fluendo uses (or used to use) "KW-DIRAC" as the identifier in the Ogg header. "BBCD" is the identifier of each of the Dirac data packages. More recently, I read that the Dirac Sequence header
2009 Jun 08
1
Ogg Skeleton
> any new fields. However, I cannot even find Dirac in oggz > http://git.xiph.org/?p=liboggz.git;a=blob;f=src/liboggz/oggz_auto.h; There's dirac.[ch] in the tools directory, though I haven't looked at what's in there. Not sure why it's segregated like that.
2008 May 29
3
How Ogg mappings translate into the codecs parameter in Ogg media types
2008/5/29 Ralph Giles <giles at xiph.org>: > On 28-May-08, at 6:20 PM, Conrad Parker wrote: > >> /* TODO: this should check against 42 for the relevant version numbers */ >> if (op->bytes < 41) return 0; > > I gather this means the USE_THEORA_PRE_ALPHA_3_FORMAT #if should instead be > based on the length of the header packet. I'm not sure why you're
2008 Nov 21
6
ogg dirac granulepos in oggz tools
2008/11/21 David Flynn <davidf+nntp at woaf.net>: > On 2008-11-21, Conrad Parker <conrad at metadecks.org> wrote: >> 2008/11/15 David Flynn <davidf+nntp at woaf.net>: >>> On 2008-11-14, Conrad Parker <conrad at metadecks.org> wrote: >>>> It seems oggz chop, merge and sort will need some attention to deal >>>> with the Dirac
2009 Jun 05
2
Ogg Skeleton
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 4:30 AM, ogg.k.ogg.k at googlemail.com <ogg.k.ogg.k at googlemail.com> wrote: > It holds the granulerate, so it'd allow this for those codecs that use the > granule shift way of encoding their granules (except for those pages > where no packet ends, as these will have no granpos set). BTW, we need to add another field out of the remaining reserved bits
2008 Nov 21
2
[Schrodinger-devel] ogg dirac granulepos in oggz tools
2008/11/15 David Flynn <davidf+nntp at woaf.net>: > On 2008-11-14, Conrad Parker <conrad at metadecks.org> wrote: >> It seems oggz chop, merge and sort will need some attention to deal >> with the Dirac granulepos and dependency ordering, so let's leave them >> for the next release. > > ok. -- may be worth having them 'warn' if they are operating
2008 May 24
5
How Ogg mappings translate into the codecs parameter in Ogg media types
Hello list, We have recently introduced the codecs (optional) parameter on the Ogg media types for easier identification of encapsulated codecs in conditions were it's not feasable to examine the streams directly. I received a comment from the IESG that we should have some sort of list to describe how Ogg mapping strings translate to codec parameter strings, so I went ahead and compiled a
2008 Feb 28
2
Re: Updating the Ogg mapping for Dirac
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:53 AM, Ralph Giles <giles@xiph.org> wrote: > On 27-Feb-08, at 10:44 PM, Conrad Parker wrote: > > > Sure: I'm thinking about Ogg demuxers and seeking implementations. > > These need to know the framerate in order to be able to interpret the > > granulepos in terms of time. If they did not have to extract that from > > the
2008 Dec 18
1
[PATCH] liboggz: add dirac.c as a source, not as a lib
Hi, this patch adds dirac.c as a source file to the oggz tools, rather than a lib. The previous would try to compile at link time, and would not include the right -I flags, and this will fail when including config.h in dirac.c (which will be needed when someone else posts a patch to get liboggz to build on win32). I'm not toally sure why dirac.c isn't just in the sources in liboggz rather
2010 Jan 25
2
Dirac question
Hi again, could someone tell me why there is links to Dirac on the Xiph wiki? The BBC takes care of Dirac, not Xiph? Is Xiph just a promoter? Secondly, how would one choose to save the video in a lossless format with Dirac, is there some interface (like a switch) in an application for this to be achieved? -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
2010 Jun 01
3
Fwd: Skeleton 4.0 draft, help with Dirac fields please!
Chris Pearce wrote: > Hi Guys & Gals, > > I need you guys to decide whether we want to include extra granulepos > fields to Skeleton 4. Given the underwhelming discussion regarding this, > I'm guessing the need and/or desire for these fields isn't really there. I haven't commented mostly because I don't know what Monty's plans for a "grand unified