similar to: TO SYMMETRY AND ASYMMETRY-----NOW ADD SUPERSYMMETRY

Hi! On z/OS, there is the need to convert strings from EBCDIC to UTF-8 and vice versa. Using the POSIX iconv functions has some challenges, so I created a small wrapper around this functionality to get the same result on all platforms. This functionality is required for reading and writing GOFF object files and can also be used in the frontend. I put up the code on Phabricator

Hi! Implementing the Memory::allocateMappedMemory() function on z/OS, I see a failure in the AArch64 COFF test case. The test case has 3 sections. For each section, Memory::allocateMappedMemory() is called to reserve memory. If the distance between the pointers gets too large, then the test case fails. It can be reliable produced with a distance of 1MB between the pointers. An easy way to

My understanding is that dynamically linking should pose no problem, but I am no lawyer. On Linux, glibc is also under LGPL license, and LLVM usually links against it. (There is really no need for us to depend on libiconv. If it is deemed to risky, then I can dropped it.) From: Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> To: Kai Peter Nacke <kai.nacke at de.ibm.com> Cc:

As part of IBM’s ongoing efforts to improve the z/OS ecosystem, our current plans involve adding support for the z/OS platform to LLVM and Clang. Our goal is to have a viable C and C++ LLVM compiler and runtime library that generates code for, and runs on z/OS. Long term, we expect to have a compiler and library that supports the platform more fully. We intend to support the native character

Hubert Tong <hubert.reinterpretcast at gmail.com> wrote on 10.06.2020 23:51:54: > From: Hubert Tong <hubert.reinterpretcast at gmail.com> > To: Kai Peter Nacke <kai.nacke at de.ibm.com> > Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Date: 10.06.2020 23:52 > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: Adding support for the z/OS > platform to LLVM and clang

Hi All, I'm trying to implement a quasi symmetry model for data on twin pairs. A crosstabulation of twin 1 by twin 2 (assumed symmetrical) stratified by another variable. There is a good paper on this by Phil (?) McCloud and Darroch in Biometrika (1995) which explains the method, but I've not done this before so am not clear how to code these models. Any help would be greatly

Does anyone know if any R package has a function that will conduct Hollander's test of bivariate symmetry? (Hollander, Biometrika, 1971) Either the exact test or an asymptotic version would be sufficient for my purposes. Thanks. Joe Boyer Statistical Sciences Renaissance Bldg 510, 3233-D Mail Stop RN0320 8-275-3661 cell: (610) 209-8531 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear R users, I am not good in R-language programming. So, i need your help. I want to convert my lower-triangle value of symmetry matrix into a vector with their row and column name. I found a function called "sm2vec" in "corpcor" package but it give only a vector of values but not row and column names. But i also want ROW and COLUMN name together with their corresponding

Is there a good reason why arguments to 'attach' and 'detach' differ so much? Yes, I know this is the documented behaviour, it just seems to violate the principle of least surprise. Examples: file = "foo.RData" df = data.frame(x=1:10,y=1:10) attach(file) # attaches the RData file 'foo.RData' attach(df) # attaches the object df Not surprising in an

Hello everybody, I'm studying descriptive statistics with R and I want to know how to calculate the asymmetry and kurtosis coefficients of a sample using R. I'll appreciate some help. Thanx, Talita Perciano Costa Leite Graduanda em Ci?ncia da Computa??o Universidade Federal de Alagoas - UFAL Departamento de Tecnologia da Informa??o - TCI Constru??o de Conhecimento por Agrupamento de

Hi all, Has anyone tested for FA in R? I need to seperate out the variance due to measurement error from variation between individuals (following Palmer & Strobeck 1986). Andy Higginson Animal Behaviour and Ecology Research Group School of Biology University of Nottingham NG7 2RD U.K. This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain

On Nov 11, 2013, at 10:44 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: >> "Unlike sqrt in libm, however, llvm.sqrt has undefined behavior for >> ..." >> >> to "... produces an undefined value", with a link back to >> ##undefined-values. > > I'm not sure that helps, because it will prevents sqrt + -fno-math-errno (a readnone sqrt)

On Nov 11, 2013, at 9:30 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> Hi Hal, all. >> >> I'm not sure why llvm.sqrt is 'special'. Maybe because there is a >> SSE >> packed sqrt instruction (SQRTPS) but not e.g. a packed sin >> instruction >> AFAIK. > > This seems relevant:

Please help, I tried a program on S-plus, and it worked. Also I tried the same program on R but not worked. Here is the programme. I put it in a function form. The model and assumption are at the bottom. where counts<-c(22,2,2,0,5,7,14,0,0,2,36,0,0,1,17,10) which is name.data, i is row size and j is the column size. symmetry function(i, j, name.data) { row <- (c(1:i)) col <-

> -----Original Message----- > From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Kai Peter Nacke > via llvm-dev > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 8:51 AM > To: Corentin <corentin.jabot at gmail.com> > Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: Adding support for the z/OS platform to LLVM and > clang > > > > 2) Add

----- Original Message ----- > > On Nov 11, 2013, at 9:30 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> Hi Hal, all. > >> > >> I'm not sure why llvm.sqrt is 'special'. Maybe because there is a > >> SSE > >> packed sqrt instruction (SQRTPS) but not e.g. a packed sin > >>

Hi Hal, all. I'm not sure why llvm.sqrt is 'special'. Maybe because there is a SSE packed sqrt instruction (SQRTPS) but not e.g. a packed sin instruction AFAIK. As mentioned in a recent mail to this list, I would like llvm.sqrt to be defined as NaN for argument x < 0. I believe this would bring it more into line with the other intrinsics, and with the libm result, which is

----- Original Message ----- > Hi Hal, all. > > I'm not sure why llvm.sqrt is 'special'. Maybe because there is a > SSE > packed sqrt instruction (SQRTPS) but not e.g. a packed sin > instruction > AFAIK. This seems relevant: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2007-August/010248.html Chris, et al., does the decision on how to treat sqrt predate our

Hello everyone, The particular motivation for this e-mail is my desire for feedback on how to fix PR17758; but there is a core design issue here, so I'd like a wide audience. The underlying issue is that, because the semantics of llvm.sqrt are purposefully defined to be different from libm sqrt (unlike all of the other llvm.<libm function> intrinsics) (*), and because autovectorization

Hi I want to du a sensitivity analysis using Latin Hypercubes. But my parameters have to fulfill two conditions: 1) ranging from 0 to 1 2) have to sum up to 1 So far I am using the lhs package and am doing the following: library(lhs) ws <- improvedLHS(1000, 7) wsSums <- rowSums(ws) wss <- ws / wsSums but I think I can't do that, as after the normalization > min(wss) [1]