similar to: Hlp with server load

John Morton wrote: > ReplayGain enabled players usually have some sort of clipping > management for just that sort of thing. Doesn't that help? I just had to study what the clipping prevention option does in the Winamp plug-in - http://www.xs4all.nl/~walterln/replaygain/dsp_replaygain.txt. I thought it was simply preventing clipping of the original waveform (ogg file). I see now that

To vorbis expert group: Sorry to drop this message but I need help :-( I got the linear pcm data from windows waveio api or vorbis codec. I think the data is signed. My goal is to construct a db scale(ppm) to display the volume while playing just like the old tape deck. The original amplitude is expressed in turn of voltage. I have no idea how to coverted it in digital

ReplayGain is not much good for FM broadcasting, and debatable for streaming too. There is a limit on the peak volume that can be broadcast on an FM signal so it is best to have a song volume of 100% broadcast with 100% FM deviation. If an average song volume is very low, for example, but has some loud peaks in it, ReplayGain will increase the volume to the extent that the peaks will be way too

Hi John A trimer/vcut type application is possible but unfortunately not a fade/normaliser. Not without decoding/encoding. I asked about this a couple of years ago. Unlike MP3, the Ogg Vorbis format doesn't store a global gain setting per frame. I have often downloaded MP3 files from mp3.com and other sources for broadcasting, and with the type of music I need, it is often not normalised

> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Fabio Muzzi [mailto:liste@kurgan.org] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Mai 2005 11:33 > Cc: samba@lists.samba.org > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Performance problem when writing large files! > > > Hello Josef, > > Tuesday, May 24, 2005, 8:39:27 AM, you wrote: > > JFlc> We encounter following problem. If somebody on the >

Olá pessoal, estou realizando uma ANOVA com medidas repetidas e estou utilizando a função "Anova" do pacote "car". Medi o biovolume de algas a cada dois dias durante 10 dias (no banco de dados abaixo só coloquei até o 4° dia). Tenho 2 tratamentos ("c","t") e o experimento foi realizado em tréplicas ("A","B","C"). > Pa2

I can't figure out why this function wont work. #Custom Function used fallInBand <- function(x){ #Assume the bands fall go up form 0 to 100 in intervals of 5 then from 100 to 1000 in intervals of 100. #returns the location (band number) if (is.na(x) == FALSE) { if(x < 100) {#bands of 5 if((x %% 5) >=0){#falls within the band Result = as.integer(x/5)+1

> From: luk > > I got the following results when I run radomForest with below > commands: > > qair <- read.table("train10.dat", header = T) > oz.rf <- randomForest(LESION ~ ., data = qair, ntree = 220, > importance = TRUE) > print(oz.rf) > > Call: > randomForest.formula(x = LESION ~ ., data = qair, ntree = > 220, importance =

I am running Icecast2 and Ices2 on Redhat Linux 9. I have two ices running with two different configuration sending to Icecast and the cpu load for each is around 7.0. The playlist contains ogg files encoded using Ogg Encoder Decoder 1.2.8b from (www.mediatwins.com) with 64kbps, 44.1KHz, VBR. The <encode> </encode> is the same for both configurations and here it is:

Source: xen-api Version: 1.3.2-15 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[1]: Entering directory `/?PKGBUILDDIR?' > omake phase1 > omake: Symbol `FamErrlist' has different size

Hi, I have a v2000 compaq laptop. The realtek network and USB on this machine was not working. After adding to grub.conf "acpi=off apci=off noacpi noapic" the v2000 realtek started working and the USB worked fine... Fantastic! So I thought I would try those same options on my r4000 laptop. they had no effect.... This AMD turion 64 4000+ rating laptop is still running SLOWWW...

Thanks, I'll take a look at this. Mike On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 12:28 AM, David Su?rez <david.sephirot at gmail.com>wrote: > Source: xen-api > Version: 1.3.2-15 > Severity: serious > Tags: jessie sid > User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130529 qa-ftbfs > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages

All of our Kafka clusters are fairly write-heavy. The cluster in question is our second-heaviest ? we haven?t yet upgraded the heaviest, due to the issues we?ve been experiencing in this one. Here is an iostat example from a host within the same cluster, but without the RAID check running: [root at r2k1 ~] # iostat -xdmc 1 10 Linux 3.10.0-327.13.1.el7.x86_64 (r2k1) 05/27/16 _x86_64_ (32 CPU)

I did some additional testing - I stopped Kafka on the host, and kicked off a disk check, and it ran at the expected speed overnight. I started kafka this morning, and the raid check's speed immediately dropped down to ~2000K/Sec. I then enabled the write-back cache on the drives (hdparm -W1 /dev/sd*). The raid check is now running between 100000K/Sec and 200000K/Sec, and has been for several

After a couple hours last night.... doing a "killall -SIGUSR1 cpuspeed" bumps up the /proc/cpuinfo information for cpu mhz to 2393 Mhz. I did notice a little increase after that. However, the machine is still sluggish. I did a "hdparm -c 1 /dev/hda" but really did not notice any difference. I tried to download fglrx64_6_8_0_8.16.20-1.x86_64.rpm from ati (also 8.20.8) and get

I?ve posted this on the forums at https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=57926&p=244614#p244614 - posting to the list in the hopes of getting more eyeballs on it. We have a cluster of 23 HP DL380p Gen8 hosts running Kafka. Basic specs: 2x E5-2650 128 GB RAM 12 x 4 TB 7200 RPM SATA drives connected to an HP H220 HBA Dual port 10 GB NIC The drives are configured as one large

Hi, LLVM 2.1-pre1 test results: Linux (SUSE) on x86 (P4) Release mode, but with assertions enabled LLVM srcdir == objdir # of expected passes 2250 # of expected failures 5 I ran the llvm-test suite on my desktop while I was also working on that PC, so don't put too much trust in the timing info. Especially during the "spiff" test the machine was swapping

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download