similar to: force SSH1 and SSH2

Here is a patch to add the missing scp -1 and -2 options to eliminate confusion for users familiar with the commercial version of SSH. This patch and others are maintained on the secure nfs (SNFS) web page: http://www.math.ualberta.ca/imaging/snfs/ -- John Bowman University of Alberta diff -ur openssh-3.0.2p1/scp.c openssh-3.0.2p1J2/scp.c --- openssh-3.0.2p1/scp.c Sun Oct 21 18:53:59 2001 +++

Hi, I have made a patch which improves scp utility. It adds two new features: rate limit and resume support. With rate limit it's possible to limit transfer speed. Resume allows to continue file transfer where it was last interrupted. Also the progress meter was improved. Here is my patch, please send comments about it and what I can do better if there is something to fix. ---

[Please Cc: me, I'm not on the list] fsh (http://www.lysator.liu.se/fsh/) is a program that keeps an ssh tunnel open and multiplexes multiple batch sessions through that single connection, avoiding slower public key crypto for things like cvs. fsh includes an utility called fcp that can multiplex file copies through this single connection. It relies on scp for the actual file copying,

Hi. This functionality was just added in 2.2.0p1. The patch is self-explanatory. Charles --- scp.c.orig-2.2.0p1 Tue Aug 29 19:11:30 2000 +++ scp.c Sat Sep 2 15:14:58 2000 @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ extern int optind; fflag = tflag = 0; - while ((ch = getopt(argc, argv, "dfprtvBCc:i:P:q46S")) != EOF) + while ((ch = getopt(argc, argv, "dfprtvBCc:i:P:q46S:")) != EOF)

Hi, The following patch does two things (which you may choose to take separatly if you don't like one or t'other). Firstly, I add a -1 and -2 option, since a) it's convenient b) people keep asking for it c) it's hardly a big fix, nor does it break backwards compatibility and d) I don't accept any slippery slope arguments. Secondly, I check for and ignore filenames with \n in

Hi! I am running Debian with the following package version: Package: ssh Version: 1:1.2.3-1 Severity: normal The "-L" option, to use a non-privileged port, is missing in "scp". Here is a simple patch that implements this option. Etienne -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Etienne M. Gagnon, M.Sc. e-mail: egagnon at

The scp -S patch didn't seem to go in cleanly; here are some fixes against the 0830 snapshot: --- scp.c~ Wed Aug 30 01:11:30 2000 +++ scp.c Fri Sep 1 12:54:14 2000 @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ extern int optind; fflag = tflag = 0; - while ((ch = getopt(argc, argv, "dfprtvBCc:i:P:q46S")) != EOF) + while ((ch = getopt(argc, argv, "dfprtvBCc:i:P:q46S:")) != EOF) switch (ch)

Hi, Several people have asked that scp support the -1 and -2 options, so I wrote this patch. Cheers, Matthew -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: scp.diff Url: http://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/attachments/20010722/7e096fab/attachment.ksh -------------- next part -------------- -- "At least you know

Hi there, I have a need to have scp pass the -P option to ssh to "bypass" the packetfilters that doesn't allow connections to return to arbitary "priviledged" ports, ie. ports <1024. See attached context sensitive diffs against 2.2.0p1 to please integrate. Thanx Hendrik Visage -------------- next part -------------- *** 1.1 2000/10/11 13:31:45 --- scp.c 2000/10/11

OpenSSH still has this feature, SSH-1.2.27 no longer has it. Admittedly it can be useful sometimes, even though I'd prefer this to be done using a trivial shell wrapper, which would be the UNIX way of doing things. Not being able to call OpenSSH's ssh by another name (say ``ssh1'') can get in the way when having to maintain two versions of ssh in parallel because the ``ssh ->

I'm fond of the "-a" (archive) option of cp, and I'm a heavy user of scp, so I guess it's inevitable that I would eventually add support for "-a" to scp. :-) Actually, it's a "-L" flag for preserving symlinks, and a "-a" flag that is shorthand for "-Lpr". Please let me know if I'm not doing this right.... I made a great

I'm curious how to go about submitting a suggestion that affects both the original BSD version and the portable release. A few days ago I sent off a BSD-relative patch to openssh at openssh.com. Is this the right thing to do? I didn't hear anything back, but it's only been 3 days, so I'm probably just being too antsy. In the meantime, maybe someone else out there would like to

I don't know if anyone would be interested in this but I'm including a patch to allow for offsets when transferring files with SCP. It's pretty simple and assumes the user knows what they are doing (for example, if transferring with a wild card the offset would apply to all files). -A is the number of bytes offset from the beginning of the files. -Z is the number of bytes inset

Hello, I was searching for this information virtually everywhere, but as I couldn't find it - I'm asking here. I was wondering, why setting the Compression Level was removed in SSH2, and if on, is always set to 6. In SSH1 it was possible to set the Compression Level from 1 to 9. I have made some tests with Compression Levels using scp: SSH1, compression 9 (highest available for

At work we have a large collection of scripts to move log and config files around. These depend on commercial (F-Secure) ssh/scp, as it supports the -u option to delete the source file after (successful) copying. That is the sole reason we can't run openssh on our 150+ unix boxes. I have attached a patch below, which adds the -u option to delete the source file after copying, provided there

Hi! Attached is a patch that lets scp accept options -1 and -2 to conveniently choose the protocol version, as it is already possible with ssh. Ciao Thomas -------------- next part -------------- ? confdefs.h Index: scp.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/openssh/scp.c,v retrieving revision 1.97 diff -u -r1.97 scp.c --- scp.c 21 Jun 2002

I noticed the "XXX: what should this be?" w.r.t. COPY_SIZE in sftp-client.c. I made up the following quick patch to allow a new command-line argument, "-B" (for 'buffer' size) to specify this value. I haven't done any strict benchmarking yet, but -B65535 is faster than -B8192 which is much faster than -B16. PS again, I am not on this list, so please CC me any

Here is a patch to scp made against openssh-2.1.1p2 that adds the -L option to scp. The -L option tells scp to use nonprivilaged ports (by passing ssh the -P option). The non-free ssh's scp has this option, and it is required under some firewall setups (like mine) for scp to function. Please let me know if there are any problems with this patch, or if there is anything I can do to help get

Hi there, I've written some enhancements to scp.c and pathnames.h to enable the scp to arbitrarily set the remote scp path. (eg $ scp -e /usr/bin/scp foo user at bar:foo) I did read the "scp: command not found" FAQ entry but I'm not quite sure why we can't do this, unless it's because enhancements to scp are no longer a priority. Any other reason why it "is the

This isn't related to the snapshot, but mention of it reminded me to submit these changes. I added a few things, and made a couple small changes; here's a list of what the patch includes: - adds a "-1" argument to ssh and ssh.1 to force protocol1, similar to the existing "-2" argument. - adds "-1" and "-2" to scp and scp.1 as well. - adds