Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "OpenSSH Trademark Infringement"
2001 Feb 16
0
Regarding Trademark Dispute.
I received the following e-mail in response to an e-mail I had
sent to SSH communications questioning the wisdom of their
requesting OpenSSH to change it's name. Contained in the message
is that statement that SSH Communications did not exert their
trademark rights earlier becuase it's only recently that
OpenSSH has become more visible.
In the United States, this would invalidate the
2001 Feb 16
6
ssh(R) trademark issues: comments and proposal
I'd like to address several issues raised by people in relation to my
notice of the ssh(R) trademark to the OpenSSH group. Also, I would
like to make a proposal to the community for resolving this issue
(included at the end).
First, I'll answer a number of questions and arguments presented in
the discussion.
> "the SSH Corp trademark registration in the US is for a logo
2001 Feb 14
0
TTSSH and the SSH trademark
Hi everyone. I want to point out some facts about TTSSH that may be
relevant to the claims of trademark infringement by OpenSSH. I'll confine
my opinions to another message :-).
I released my product, which has always been named "Teraterm SSH" and is
usually abbreviated to "TTSSH", to the public in May 1998. TTSSH is a free
software Windows client for the SSH1 protocol.
2001 Feb 14
1
More on TTSSH and the SSH trademark
I would also like to mention that when I released TTSSH in May 1998, I had
no concerns about violating any trademarks because I observed that the
name "SSH" was already being used by several different parties for
different purposes --- as the name of Ylonen's original SSH package and
its derivatives, as the name of the protocol, and as a component of names
of other implementations
2014 Mar 09
2
Question about trademarks
I've tried emailing this to centos-tm at redhat.com , but
mailer-daemon at googlemail.com sent me this
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
centos-tm at redhat.com
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain redhat.com by mx1.redhat.com. [209.132.183.28].
The error that
2010 May 01
0
Mutually assured minefields.
The specific standards process used to develop the MPEG codecs
creates patent minefields that royalty-free codecs don't generally
face. Because many knowledgeable people have heard of the problems
faced by these patent-soup standards, they may extrapolate these risk
to codecs developed under a different process where these problems
are less considerable. This is a mistake, and I'll explain
2001 Feb 14
10
SSH trademarks and the OpenSSH product name
Friends,
Sorry to write this to a developer mailing list. I have already
approached some OpenSSH/OpenBSD core members on this, including Markus
Friedl, Theo de Raadt, and Niels Provos, but they have chosen not to
bring the issue up on the mailing list. I am not aware of any other
forum where I would reach the OpenSSH developers, so I will post this
here.
As you know, I have been using the SSH
2009 Oct 10
3
Theora patent question
Does the reason Theora is relatively safe from patent infringement
lawsuit have more to do with it actually not being encumbered, or is
it because its use is decentralized?
For example, FreeType is not patent-free, nor is Linux, yet they
succeed because on the one hand, they are open source, and those who
maintain them do not guarantee anything regarding patents, it is up to
each individual user
2010 Mar 28
2
Status of s3tc patent in respect to open-source drivers and workarounds
Hi radeonhd, nouveau, mesa3d developers,
Firstly, thank you all very much for all the important work you do.
I've been working as a part-time developer on the "Spring RTS" project
(open-source game engine) which runs on linux (and other os). Some time
ago I tried the engine on the open-source ATI radeonhd driver, which I
understand to be partly based on mesa 3d, and all textures
2010 Apr 30
2
Steve Jobs about theora
I guess you've all read it already, but here it goes:
"All video codecs are covered by patents. A patent pool is being
assembled to go after Theora and other ?open source? codecs now.
Unfortunately, just because something is open source, it doesn?t mean
or guarantee that it doesn?t infringe on others patents. An open
standard is different from being royalty free or open source.
Sent
2011 Jan 19
1
Printer Configuration Centos 5
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body style="font-size: 12px; background-image:
url("http://202.131.101.226/stationary/xcelris.jpg");
margin: 100px 0px 0px 10px; color: rgb(0,
2001 Apr 27
0
SRP unencumbered license statement available
For those of you who were following the discussion about the new draft
and implementation of SRP-based password authentication in OpenSSH, I
promised to have Stanford issue the IETF an official, explicit,
statement reiterating the unencumbered royalty-free licensing terms.
The new statement is now available from the IETF's IPR page.
Tom
2004 Aug 06
0
No subject
fast enough, and data transfer costs for video servers are low enough, and
video codecs such as RealVideo 10 and VP6 are good enough that online video
is practical today.
For people who already have DSL, cable modem, or other broadband Internet
connections, the biggest barrier to their being able to view any movie
Hollywood has ever produced simply by pointing and clicking at some link on
the
2006 Oct 03
2
Xen is affected by the trademark desease
Hi folks
XenSource published a trademark policy[1]. I don't think we will be able
to follow it if we want to support installation of different versions at
the same time.
Bastian
[1]: http://www.xensource.com/company/legal.html
--
There are some things worth dying for.
-- Kirk, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3201.7
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was
2001 Feb 15
0
The SSH trademark issue part #1
Hi,
I usually stay away from issues like this, basically because I'm not a
lawyer (and don't want to be one), and I don't have a real interest in
these issues.
Quoting Tatu :
> We also have a trademark pending on the Secure Shell mark
This seriously undermines the IETF standard draft. It's the same as
registering 'milk' as a trademark. Both Secure and Shell are
2004 Dec 03
1
CentOS-3 errata - updated httpd fixes trademark issue
A new version of httpd is available for CentOS-3 i386
This fixes a missed trademark issue in previous build.
https://bugzilla.caosity.org/show_bug.cgi?id=710 refers.
Updated files are :-
updates/i386/RPMS/httpd-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2.i386.rpm
updates/i386/RPMS/httpd-devel-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2.i386.rpm
updates/i386/SRPMS/httpd-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2.src.rpm
yum update httpd will be
2007 Jan 01
1
Centos trademark issue
I found an old ROM BIOS chip in my drawer with label Centos(r) Copyright
1994 on it. Then I found http://www.centos.com.tw/ on the net.
Has anyone checked if you can use the name centos without any fear of
litigation?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070101/3918e0cc/attachment-0001.html>
2010 Jul 20
1
Registered / trademark signs
Colleagues,
What is the easiest means to embed a:
? (registered)
or
? (trademark)
sign in text in a graphic. I would like to use mtext and avoid plotmath, if possible. Ideally, the sign should be superscripted but I can easily sacrifice that.
Optimally, I need a solution that works in both OS X and Windows (? XP) and with R versions ? 2.11
Thanks in advance.
Dennis
Dennis Fisher MD
P <
2004 Oct 20
0
CentOS-3 errata - updated squirrelmail removes trademark issue
An updated squirrelmail has been released for CentOS-3 that removes a
trademark problem.
https://bugzilla.caosity.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682
Updated file is :-
squirrelmail-1.4.3-0.e3.1.centos.1.noarch.rpm
in updates/i386/RPMS/
These are
2008 Jun 28
0
Bug#391935: updated trademark policy
There's an updated trademark policy available here:
http://xen.org/about/legal.html
It also includes an email address for questions.
I won't try to interpret the 8-page document myself.
Hope this helps,
Diego