similar to: CuteFTP and sftp.

I have Centos3.3 installed, vsftpd, apache2, ports 20&21 open on router, firewall disabled at this time : /etc/passwd looks like this --- ftpadmin:x:502:502::/var/www:sbin/noligin uncommented the lines in /etc/vsftpd/vsftpd.conf : chroot_list_enable=YES chroot_list_file=/etc/vsftpd.chroot_list I can access ftp from within network no problem, but using external ip it will validate login

System = CentOS / Apache 2.0 / HTML files location = /var/www/html Nat'd IP - ports 80, 20, 21 already opened & routed to internal ip. I desperately need the quick & dirty solution. I need a setup where one user can ftp from another desktop (windows) to upload new website files. I currently have CuteFTP, but will use anything needed at this point. I need to try to test this today.

Hi all! Here is my problem: I have installed RedHat Linux version 6.0 on a computer and I want to share its resources via samba. Unfortunately, my computer - which is running WfWg 3.11 for Eastern Europe and the trumpet winsock TCP/IP stack is not able to see the samba server. Other computers, running Win95, Linux and WfWg with M$ TCP/IP stack perform OK. I have tried the following combinations:

Out of the box on Solaris 2.7 using the internal entropy system. I am able to login but as soon as I get past the password prompt it dies because it claims the RNG is not initialised. Transcript: [..] debug: got SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT You have entered the land of dragons and mystical creatures. This server does not exist.

I have setup an OpenSSH_3.5p1 ssh/sftp server on my SunOS 4.1.4 box. I can ssh to it just fine. The problem is SFTP from certain clients. I can SFTP to it using my OpenSSH_3.5p1 sftp client. I can SFTP to it from MacSFTP from MacSSH.org, version 1.0.5. However, I have several clients that cannot connect. I have had them try CuteFTP Pro v2, v3, WS_FTP Pro v7.62, PuTTy pSFTP. None are able to

I dug through the list archives to see if this had come up before, and I see that a bug <http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393> was submitted and subsequently closed (basically rejected) in 2002. The basic issue, for those of you who don't feel like following the bug URL, is that when one has ssh servers behind a NAT, each of which responds to a different port on the NAT IP,

Hi, quick patch to ssh-copy-id to make it set the file modes more correctly. Thanks, Matthew --- contrib/ssh-copy-id.orig Thu Sep 27 21:47:44 2001 +++ contrib/ssh-copy-id Thu Sep 27 21:47:52 2001 @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ exit 1 fi -{ eval "$GET_ID" ; } | ssh $1 "test -d .ssh || mkdir .ssh ; cat >> .ssh/authori zed_keys ; chmod g-w . .ssh .ssh/authorized_keys" +{ eval

Outside the known 'Hang-on-exit' bug and the Solaris 'PAM_TTY_KLUDGE' required. *WHAT* other issues *MUST* be address before 3.0 which is approaching fast? Those running NeXTStep I need conformation that it works under NeXT. My current Slab is packed in a storage unit due to a fire in my apartment complex (happened above me so I'm wrapping up dealing with that crap =). -

I''ve written a little ruby/rails hangman-ish app to keep my wife occupied at work that I think list members might also find interesting. I''m new to this list so I wanted to see if it would be considered bad form to post the link before I did. There aren''t any ads so I''m not getting anything out of more visitors, but I still didn''t want to take the

Things that are still outstanding: 1) Solaris/Redhat/HPUX session.c patch. I've not seen a ya or na on Kevin's pam patch from the Solaris group. 2) Odd Redhat/Debian scp/ssh issues. .. I'm baffled, and I can't replicate the bug. Nor have I seen anything remotely like it reported. 3) SCO.. Is it happy yet for compiling? =) Completed: 1) mdoc2man.pl .. Commited into

Comments from the rest of the Solaris group? - Ben ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 11:20:33 +0100 From: Volker Paulsen <paulsen at orbiteam.de> To: mouring at etoh.eviladmin.org Subject: Linker flags in 2.5.1p1... While I'm compiling 2.5.1p1, I've got the following remarks: Host: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Compiler: cc Compiler

When doing a simple configure of OpenSSh 2.5.2p2 on a Sparc running RedHat 6.0 I get: ... updating cache ./config.cache creating ./config.status creating Makefile sed: file conftest.s1 line 1: Unknown command: ``^'' creating openbsd-compat/Makefile sed: file conftest.s1 line 1: Unknown command: ``^'' creating ssh_prng_cmds sed: file conftest.s1 line 1: Unknown command:

I just installed opensolaris build 130 which i downloaded from genunix. The install went fine....and the first reboot after install seemed to work but when i powered down and rebooted fully, it locks up as soon as i log in. Gnome is still showing the icon it shows when stuff hasn''t finished loading....is there any way i can find out why it''s locking up and how to fix it?

This is just portable todo list. From the sounds of it Markus has his own to do list. But can everyone review and let me know if there is anything missing from this list. (Note.. I'm not looking for 'SSH should support XYZ feature.' unless it's directly related to portability.) Or if there is anything on this list that has been completed. (Namely Tru64 SIA support?) Thanks.

Ulrik wrote: Message: 2 Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:59:14 +0200 (CEST) From: "Ulrik S. Kofod" <usk at cybersite.dk> To: centos at caosity.org Reply-To: usk at cybersite.dk Subject: [Centos] network card / kudzu When I have installed centOS, Kudzu says my network cards have been removed, and right after it finds them again and asks me to configure them? It looks like it is the

I could actually go for once, but haven't seen any annoucement... Thanks, --paulr

Known issues: 1) Linux 'sleep 20' -- Unfixable before 2.5.0 (known work around) 2) HP/UX signal issue -- Patched and HP/UX 11 works in v2 3) SCO 2/ Native Compiler -- Unfixable before 2.5.0 (known work around) 4) NeXTStep -- Resynced, MAX_GROUPS vs NGROUPS unresolved (not major) 5) DG/UX regcomp/regexec -- Fixed. 6) Cray signal issues -- ??? 7) Solaris '$PATH' issue -- ??

I've tried to run a Tukey post-hoc but keep getting this weird error, whether the aov was significant or not. treat_code is a dummy variable, but that shouldn't matter. Any suggestions? Thanks Amy > summary(aov(EtoH~treat_code, mydata)) Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) treat_code 1 16.44 16.44 11.027 0.001014 ** Residuals 287 427.91 1.49 --- Signif.

Either this never made it to the list or no one cares about Tru64. This is the last time I'll send this patch to the list. If no one steps up and finishes it or provides me with enough information to fix any remaining bugs (one being complaint that 'ssh site cmd' does not work right). If there is no activity on this for a week. I'll post it to bugzilla and will ignore any

I was discussing with Don about a private topic..and while skimming the code I noticed that during a 'ssh mouring at site ls' the /etc/environment is *ONLY* read if the remote machine is an AIX box. This is undocumented and I'm wondering if someone using AIX could explain WHY it exists in the session.c:do_child()? No other OS has this. I don't see why AIX should require it.