similar to: Information leakage in sshd

Hi, Thought I'd just forward this here, because I don't have time to look into it right now, and am off skiing next week. I'd guess that we should be checking for username = ``root'' before going off to do password checks, and rejecting it on that basis first. Cheers, Phil. -- Mind-numbingly stupid UK law alert! Act now to stop it! http://www.stand.org.uk/ --------------

When I repeated restarting VM or define and undefined VM during my recently test, memory leakage of xend is detected. Our elementary conclusion is that the python memory management mechanism causes this problem, but I do not know how to further locate the exact lines. Can anybody here give me any suggestions? Thx. Yong an Liu

Are you still facing the problem ? If so, Can you please provide the workload , cmd_log_history file, log files , etc ? Regards Rafi KC On 06/23/2017 02:06 PM, shridhar s n wrote: > Hi All, > > We are using GlusterFS 3.10.2 (upgraded from 3.7.0 last week) on > CentOS 7.x . > > We continue to see memory utilization going up once every 3 days. The > memory utilization of

Hi All, We are using GlusterFS 3.10.2 (upgraded from 3.7.0 last week) on CentOS 7.x . We continue to see memory utilization going up once every 3 days. The memory utilization of the server demon(glusterd) in ?server is keep on increasing. In about 30+ hours the Memory utilization of glusterd service alone will reach 70% of memory available. Since we have alarms for this threshold, we get notified

So one of my coworkers is doing a little research on SSH usage in the wild using netflow data. One of the things he's trying to do is determine a way to differentiate between data transfers and interactive sessions. We thought of a couple of ways but we wanted to float them here and see if there are methods incorporated to defeat thi sort of traffic analysis. The first idea is to look at

On 10/29/2020 2:53 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 01:17:14PM -0700, si-wei liu wrote: >> On 10/15/2020 6:11 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 02:15:32PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> On 2020/10/14 ??7:42, si-wei liu wrote: >>>>>> So what I suggest is to fix the pinning leakage first and do the

This looks like a case of FAQ 7.42: https://cran.r-project.org/doc/FAQ/R-FAQ.html#Why-is-R-apparently-not-releasing-memory_003f On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Daniel Raduta <datudar at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I am experiencing a very noticeable memory leak when using large lists of > large data. The code below creates a list of matrices, yet the memory does > not

Dear All, <<OS and software>> R-1.81 j2sdk1.4.0_03 SJava_0.66-1 Windows NT4.01 I try to run R from Java with SJava and I seem to have the same problem as discussed before in this mail list a few month ago: https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2003-May/031960.html https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2003-May/031962.html

Hi, I've recently deployed dovecot on our servers, to replace courier-imapd. I'm delighted with its features and performance, but there's a major problem - it's leaking pop3-login processes. We have about 60 client machines, each collecting mail once every two minutes. In this configuration, the number of pop3-login processes increases by about ten an hour - apparently without

editors note: just now found something about IdentitiesOnly that might do the trick. there's some other stuff in here too. about preventing info leakage [keys for other sites] from appearing in the client<-->server key negotiation with ssh-agent and IdentityFile. ssh/config:IdentityFile - seems to indicate that only the specified key will be tried, and if that key fails, no other keys

We have been fighting with intermittent connections here and have noticed that tinc seems to use up its supply of file descriptors. After a whole bunch of Nov 8 03:51:23 tserver tinc.calgary[23909]: Could not set up a meta connection. Nov 8 03:51:23 tserver tinc.calgary[23909]: Still failed to connect to other. Will retry Nov 8 03:51:33 tserver tinc.calgary[23909]: 10.38.9.1:8193: Connection

On 2020/10/30 ??3:45, Si-Wei Liu wrote: > This reverts commit 7ed9e3d97c32d969caded2dfb6e67c1a2cc5a0b1. > > Signed-off-by: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu at oracle.com> > --- > drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------ > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-) I saw this has been reverted there

Hi, all: I'm using R 1.7.0 on WinXP under SDI mode. However, very often after I closed all R windows, my CPU usage was still 100%. By checking the task manager, I found there are one or several "Rgui.exe" still running and took all the CPU. I had to close them one by one manually. This happened to me with R 1.6.1, R 1.6.2 also and also on Win2K. Rememeber there was a

Pinned pages are not properly accounted particularly when mapping error occurs on IOTLB update. Clean up dangling pinned pages for the error path. As the inflight pinned pages, specifically for memory region that strides across multiple chunks, would need more than one free page for book keeping and accounting. For simplicity, pin pages for all memory in the IOVA range in one go rather than have

Pinned pages are not properly accounted particularly when mapping error occurs on IOTLB update. Clean up dangling pinned pages for the error path. As the inflight pinned pages, specifically for memory region that strides across multiple chunks, would need more than one free page for book keeping and accounting. For simplicity, pin pages for all memory in the IOVA range in one go rather than have

Hi, Was this ever resolved? I'm curious, I'm also in a situation where there may be many (very many) JITted functions over the history of an application (which may be running for many days) Thanks On Mar 20, 2009, at 7:34 AM, George Giorgidze wrote: > Hi, > > In my application I am JITing thousands of functions, though I am > doing it sequantially and running only

Hi, I've spotted a possible memory leakage/violation in the latest R v2.1.1 patched and R v2.2.0dev on Windows XP Pro SP2 Eng. I first caught it deep down in a nested svd algorithm when subtracting a double 'c' from a integer vector 'a' where both had finite values but when assigning 'a <- a - c' would report NaNs whereas (a-c) alone would not. Different runs

Hello, I am experiencing a very noticeable memory leak when using large lists of large data. The code below creates a list of matrices, yet the memory does not free up after removing that item and performing a garbage collection. Is there a something I can do to prevent this memory leak? Any help would be greatly appreciated. By the way, if you execute the code, please run it in a new R session.

This message is a few years old so I cannot reply to the original, but it is still of current research interest. > So one of my coworkers is doing a little research on SSH usage in the > wild using netflow data. One of the things he's trying to do is > determine a way to differentiate between data transfers and interactive > sessions. We thought of a couple of ways but we wanted

Hi ! Is anyone working on getting -R (remote port forwarding) working with protocol 2 ? I might be interested in helping but don't want to duplicate any previous work. -Jarno -- Jarno Huuskonen - System Administrator | Jarno.Huuskonen at uku.fi University of Kuopio - Computer Center | Work: +358 17 162822 PO BOX 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland | Mobile: +358 40 5388169