similar to: find canonic host name

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "find canonic host name"

2010 Feb 01
1
"phishing" (was: [patch] Automatically add keys to agent)
[ Sorry, I did not see the renamed thread until I'd already replied on the old one. Calling this a phishing attack is exactly right. ] On 2010-01-30, Joachim Schipper wrote: > If I understand you correctly, you argue that connecting to malicious > hosts is currently secure, and will remain secure, but that it will > become easier to convince people to send the passphrase for
2008 Jan 03
2
scp -q behavior different than documented
Hi The man page says -q disables the progress meter, but it also disables all other output. $ scp -q badhost:/bin/ls . $ scp badhost:/bin/ls . ssh: badhost: Name or service not known I would like -q to disable the progress meter as documented (I don't see the point of a -q flag if all it does is discards stderr, since I can already do that with my shell), but you might prefer to update
2008 Nov 11
3
exponential of a matrix
Is the matrix exponential available in some package? The cannonical reference is "Nineteen dubious ways to take the exponential of a matrix". (Love that title) Terry T.
2008 Jan 07
7
[Bug 1427] New: scp -q behavior different than documented
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1427 Summary: scp -q behavior different than documented Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.7p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: scp AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org
2004 Mar 29
1
--from-files broken with remote sources
Using rsync 2.6.0 on both ends, I ran rsync -v --files-from files andrew@pimlott.net: . and got an error from the remote rsync. The reason is that the remote rsync is run as rsync --server --sender -vvR --files-from=- --from0 . which conflicts with a check in options.c that rsync must have two non-option arguments when --files-from is used. I tried again with the latest nightly
2013 Aug 05
2
RemoteForward and dynamically allocated listen port
Specifying a RemoteForward of 0:example.com:1234 dynamically allocates the listen port on the server, and then reports it to ... the client! Where it is practically useless. Was this someone's idea of a joke? Presumably not--there are some technical obstacles to reporting it to the remote process. I'd like to help solve that problem. The natural way to me would be to extend the syntax
2008 Feb 18
4
newbie (me) needs to model distribution as two overlapping gaussians
Recently, I have been working with some data that look like two overlapping gaussian distributions. I would like to either 1) determine the mean and SD for each of the two distributions OR 2) get some (bayesian ?) statistic that estimates how likely an observation is to belong to the left-hand or right-hand distribution In case I'm using the wrong language, my data looks something like
2005 Apr 20
1
message status changed from new to old on read
Hi. I'm new to IMAP, but just tried uw-imapd and then dovecot in conjuction with offlineimap. I'm using Debian package version 0.99.14-1 and have my mail in mbox format. One of the first things that annoys me about both programs is that as soon as you read a mailbox over imap, the imapd changes all "new" messages to "old". It seems to have the assumption that the
2001 Jan 18
2
ssh-add bug
There is an amusing bug in ssh-add that causes it to go into an infinite loop. I am using openssh 1.2.3, and noticed that when I ran "ssh-add < /dev/null" in my X startup scripts, but didn't have ssh-askpass installed, ssh-add started spewing errors into my .xsession-errors and didn't stop. I found that what happens is: ssh-add forks and attempts to exec ssh-askpass. The
2008 Apr 04
2
[LLVMdev] llvm.org Downtime on Tuesday, March 8
Dear All, The LLVM network services (llvm.org web site, SVN server, etc.) will be offline starting at 10:30 am Central Time on Tuesday, March 8. We are moving the machine hosting these services to the server room where it will be a dedicated server machine from Tuesday henceforth. I expect the move will take less than 15 minutes. I will email the list about an hour before the move as a
2010 Nov 24
8
hard links across snapshots/subvolumes are actually a bad idea.
I''ve been thinking about this for a while, from a perspective of how to make it work by allocating i-node numbers from a global pool, but yesterday I realized that offering the feature would be a bad idea because it violates the semantics of file systems. I will be happy to expand on that point if anyone disagrees with it. dln -- "It is merely a matter of persistence." --
2012 Oct 04
2
[LLVMdev] Interprocedural Register Allocation
Hi Jakob, On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk>wrote: > > On Oct 4, 2012, at 2:27 PM, "Madhusudan C.S" <madhusudancs at gmail.com> > wrote: > > Basically, the PrologEpilogInsertion pass will add a bit mask to >> MachineModuleInfo describing which registers are clobbered by the function >> being compiled. Later,
2000 Oct 03
1
find canonic host name [SECURITY VULNERABILITY]
I reported a bug recently to the debian bug tracking system but I just checked this mailing list and it seems it was already mentioned here. However the thread seemed to have died. This is worrisome because it's rather a severe security vulnerability. OpenSSH seems to have changed behaviour to canonicalize host names _before_ looking up keys in known_hosts. This is BAD. AWFUL. TERRIBLE. This
2004 Mar 26
1
--link-dest mostly useless on a server without chroot
When using the rsync server without chroot, the --link-dest and --compare-dest options are almost useless. This is because sanitize_paths is called on the link-dest directory, stripping out leading dots and slashes. Thus, the only possiblitiy for a link-dest directory is under the target directory, which is generally not useful. There doesn't seem to be an easy fix. sanitize_paths is
2012 Nov 02
2
[LLVMdev] Interprocedural Register Allocation
On Oct 31, 2012, at 1:41 PM, Madhusudan C.S <madhusudancs at gmail.com> wrote: > I have spent last 4 weeks trying to figure out how to implement > Interprocedural Register Allocation. I must admit that I was really > overwhelmed with LLVM's codebase while trying to figure this out :) > There is so much to know! I think I have reached a point where I > have some sort of
2008 Apr 04
0
[LLVMdev] llvm.org Downtime on Tuesday, March 8
March or April? ;) -Tanya On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > The LLVM network services (llvm.org web site, SVN server, etc.) will be > offline starting at 10:30 am Central Time on Tuesday, March 8. We are > moving the machine hosting these services to the server room where it > will be a dedicated server machine from Tuesday henceforth. > > I
2015 Oct 15
2
Operand bundles and gc transition arguments
As part of adding `"deopt"` operand bundles, we're aiming to change RewriteStatepointsForGC (called RS4GC henceforth) from rewriting existing `gc.statepoint` calls to transforming normal LLVM calls and invokes into `gc.statepoint` calls and invokes (i.e. to do PlaceSafepoints + RS4GC in one step). This will make `gc.statepoint` an artifact of the gc lowering strategy that only
2016 Jul 25
2
sendmail getting domain\user as email userId
On 25/07/16 16:31, Data Control Systems - Mike Elkevizth wrote: > Hi Mark, > > I'm not sure why a DC ignores the "winbind use default domain = yes" > setting. Its not the only setting that a DC ignores and the only real hint > of DCs acting weird is the line in the introduction of the wiki about > setting Samba up as a DC that calls these "idiosyncrasies in
2004 Mar 26
1
exclude confusion: what does it match against?
The exact filename tested against include/exclude patterns is not always obvious, and the documentation is somewhat ambiguous about it. This bites particularly when using patterns starting with '/'. I just spent an hour being confused by this. Here are some suggested edits to the documentation. Current: The filenames matched against the exclude/include patterns are relative to
2014 Sep 03
5
[PATCH v4 0/4] virtio: Clean up scatterlists and use the DMA API
On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 16:42 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > But there aren't any ACPI systems with both virtio-pci and IOMMUs, > right? So we could say that, henceforth, ACPI systems must declare > whether virtio-pci devices live behind IOMMUs without breaking > backward compatibility. I don't know for sure whether that's the case and whether we can rely on that not