similar to: Bug in openssh-1.2.2p1 scp program?

Hi, This patch fixes a couple of small items in 1.2.pre14: 1. It's ssh-askpass, not scp that was moved to $(libexecdir)/ssh. 2. Make sure that $(libexecdir) exists. --- openssh-1.2pre14/ChangeLog~ Mon Nov 22 08:11:23 1999 +++ openssh-1.2pre14/ChangeLog Mon Nov 22 09:48:15 1999 @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ - EGD uses a socket, not a named pipe. Duh. - Fix includes in fingerprint.c - Fix scp

Hi, This patch fixes a couple of small ``problems'' in 1.2pre17 Makefile.in: 1. Avoid making an empty $(libexecdir)/ssh directory. 2. Don't try to uninstall $(mandir)/man1/slogin.1 twice. --- openssh-1.2pre17/Makefile.in~ Thu Dec 9 00:48:58 1999 +++ openssh-1.2pre17/Makefile.in Thu Dec 9 06:51:41 1999 @@ -92,9 +92,9 @@ -rm -f $(mandir)/man1/slogin.1 ln -s ssh.1

Hi, After fixing the --with-tcp-wrappers problem I decided to look closer at configure.in and found that --with-md5-passwords didn't work either. This patch fixes both problems (remember to run autoconf.) diff -ur openssh-1.2pre14.orig/configure.in openssh-1.2pre14/configure.in --- openssh-1.2pre14.orig/configure.in Mon Nov 22 06:11:05 1999 +++ openssh-1.2pre14/configure.in Mon Nov 22

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have just uploaded openssh-1.2pre15 to http://violet.ibs.com.au/openssh/ Changes: - Merged big source cleanup from OpenBSD CVS. All the source now conforms to: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=style&apropos=0&sektion=9&manpath=OpenBSD+Current&format=html - Added BSD compatible install program - More

Hi, This patch adds a BSD compatible install script (copied from gcc-2.95.2) to 1.2pre14. The script has a X-style license. The script will be used if configure doesn't find a proper install program on the system. Remember to run autoconf and set execute (755) permissions for install-sh when the patch has been applied. -- Niels Kristian Bech Jensen -- nkbj at image.dk --

Howdy, It seems that even when specifying the --with-tcp-wrappers configure flag, the LIBWRAP define in config.h never gets #define'd and -lwrap never gets added to LIBS in the Makefile. To make sure I wasn't dealing with a stale configure file, I ran autoconf on configure.in to roll a new configure. I also don't see anything wrong with the --with-tcp-wrappers defined in

openssh-1.2pre12 is available at http://violet.ibs.com.au/openssh/ Changes: Merged many OpenBSD changes Cleanup of askpass support More solaris support Shadow password support Build fixes RPM spec file fixes RPM init script fixes Detailed changelog: 19991115 - Merged OpenBSD CVS changes: - [ssh-add.c] change passphrase loop logic and remove ref to $DISPLAY, ok niels - Changed to

Okay - We went around and around on the idea that adding an option to restrict scp to only allow files to be copied to a certain directory (or below) based on a different startup param. I was told to use all sorts of different options, parameters, methods, etc... All because no one wanted to modify the scp code, for whatever reasoning. I'm sitting here laughing right now, seriously

It's needed to enumerate both UFS1/2 since they have different magic numbers and super block offsets. Besides, UFS2 can be installed in the 0-64k range like BTRFS, whereas UFS1 can't. UFS2 has no cow feature unlike BTRFS. Signed-off-by: Raphael S.Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> --- extlinux/main.c | 79 ++++++++++--- extlinux/ufs.h | 26 ++++

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1989 Bug #: 1989 Summary: SCP wihout a source path Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.3p2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: scp AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs

It's needed to enumerate both UFS1/2 since they have different magic numbers and super block offsets. Besides, UFS2 can be installed in the 0-64k range like BTRFS, whereas UFS1 can't. Signed-off-by: Raphael S.Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> --- extlinux/main.c | 71 +++++++++--- extlinux/ufs.h | 26 ++++ extlinux/ufs_fs.h | 307

On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 10:58:30AM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Why "slash": /.thunderbird in case of your example? Because if you do not > specify absolute path beginning with / the ssh daemon prepends your > relative path with its `pwd` it runs in, and its `pwd` is "/") I'm not sure I understand what you're saying here... Are you saying that if I run

Hi, I'm having trouble finding the correct syntax to scp between two remote hosts with non-defaults ports. <scp -P 1234 user at remotehost:/sourcefile -P 4321 user at remotehost:/destfile> No matter what i've tried i cant get scp to connect both servers with different ports. Is this even possible? The workaround i've found is to use <ssh... "scp..."> Thanks,

On Windows, ?scp C:/foo/bar remotehost:? will attempt to connect to a remote host ?C? and access file ?/foo/bar?. There is currently no syntax or flag to allow copying files that start with a drive name. This patch changes the behaviour (only on Cygwin) by considering that a single letter followed by a colon is a Windows drive name and thus an absolute path. This is also more consistent with the

A few people have commented that the synopsis in 'man 1 scp' is a bit difficult for humans to parse. I attach a diff between the distributed version and mine: (I suppose this should really go to the OpenBSD maintainers, but I wanted a little feedback about whether this was better or not.) Thanks, Andrew Stribblehill Systems Programmer, IT Service, University of Durham --------------

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=852 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2004-09-11

Attached is a small patch that should fix most of the problems reported. I am adding a recommendation to use GNU make to the INSTALL document. Regards, Damien -- | "Bombay is 250ms from New York in the new world order" - Alan Cox | Damien Miller - http://www.mindrot.org/ | Email: djm at mindrot.org (home) -or- djm at ibs.com.au (work) -------------- next part -------------- Index:

I hear you - but it seems that the choice is between (a) limiting "scp" functionality to address the security vulnerability, and (b) killing "scp" altogether. I'd much prefer (a), even if it means I lose "scp remotehost:foo\* .". Especially, since (almost always) I have equal privileges on both local and remote hosts, so in that case I just originate that

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size="2">Jing Li,<br /> <br /> Thank you for contacting us. This is an automated response confirming the receipt of your ticket. One of our agents will get back to you as soon as possible. For your records, the details of the ticket are listed below. When replying, please make sure that the ticket ID is kept in the

Hello! I have just installed a legal copy of a two--disk game using Wine. The first problem when trying to run the installed game was "Anti-piracy protection: no CD/DVD drive found". It could be prevented by mapping CD directly onto the root directory of a new drive. But then the next message showed: "Anti-piracy protection: No disk in CD drive" or something like that. The CD