similar to: Network Card Priority

Im assuming, that because I never filled out a support ticket with these people that someone else has done so using my email address. Anyone else experiencing anything like this? Or is this normal from the CentOS mailing list? The topic in the email is a topic ive responded to on the list, but have not visited any website to fill in any support requests... If someone is using my email address

Hey All, I read on the list here not to long ago a work around for the following error on CentOS for installing the scalix mail server... Error: unsupported OS release: CentOS release 4.2 (Final) on x86_64 Someone posted a fix where you could edit a file changing the name of the OS or something to fix this. Anyone remember which file it was I could edit and what I needed to edit it too

Thank You for your Email. Please be advised that I am currently out of the office on holidays and will be returning on Wednesday August 9th 2006. If this email is of urgent nature please email sales at nucleus.com and someone will respond as soon as they can. You can also contact sales via telephone at 209-0000 and ask for the sales department. The first available rep will be glad to assist

Hello, It appears there is a limit in the number of criteria that can be put into the Aggregate sum function. (It looks like it is 32). My code is; HSfirst=aggregate(count,

>> The problem is performance. While Samba is not terribly slow it's still >> too slow. Copying large files takes about half a minute/meg on an > >i find that samba running on FreeBSD is also pathetically slow: 10 to 20 >k per second. adding "socket options = TCP_NODELAY" speeds this up by a >factor of ten to twenty, on a 10mb/s LAN with NE2000 cards. it

hello, i was just trying to install the ogg package on my old 486 (~70 mhz iirc) machine, but was not able to compile the libvorbis-package because of: gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 6 i think that this is not really a problem of vorbis, but of my old gcc-version (2.7.2.3). however, before upgrading gcc (and who knows, what else needs to be upgraded, too) i would like

FYI -------- Original Message -------- Subject: rsync exclude file - directory name without directory contents Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 22:28:37 GMT Newsgroups: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.unix.admin When using rsync to maintain incremental backups significant space can be saved on the backup server by excluding directories that have non-critical or transient data such as /tmp, /proc,

This is an x86_64 system that I just updated from 4.2 to 4.3 (including the csgfs stuff). When I watch the bootup on the console, I see an error: lvm.static: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/liblvm2clusterlock.so: undefined symbol: lvm_snprintf This error comes immediately after the "Activating VGs" line, so it appears to be triggered by the vgchange command in the clvmd startup

We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 965/5000P chipset. Here is the test summary: Bug has been fixed: ========================== 1).VMX domains fail to reboot bug has been fixed. Issues: ========================== 1) VBD driver does not work well http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=831 2) Only one vCPU is found in SMP xenU guest OS

New issues (0) ================================================= No new issue. Fixed issue ================================================= 1) save&restore hvm guest will cause dom0 crash http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=962 2) xen0 hang when destroying a XenU guest http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=963 3) Build HVM PV driver failed

New issues (2) ================================================= 1) HVM guest can not boot up with qcow image. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=991 2) Disk I/O performance of IA32-pae HVM guest is very slow http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=992 3) xen0 hang or crash when destroy VMX guest if not enable "debug=y"

Hi,All We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 915/E8500 chipset. Two platforms (PAE/32E) test all are based on SMP, It means that we boot up SMP guest OS in VMX. Here is the test summary: New issue (1) ================================================ 1) Fails to restore VMX guests http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=929 Issues List (3):

New issues (0) ================================================= No new issue. Old issues (4): ================================================= 1) IA32E/PAE: 32bit Vista RTM network doesn''t work. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=840 2)time latency is a negative number on window guest when vcpu > 1 http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=895 You

We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 915/E8500 chipset. Three platforms (32/PAE/32E) test all are based on SMP, It means that we boot up SMP guest OS in VMX. Here is the test summary: New issue ================================================ No new issue Issues List: ================================================ 1) IA32E/PAE: 32bit Vista RTM network doesn''t

New issues (2) ================================================= 1) Data corrupted after copied into a 32bit win2k3 guest on 64bit hypervisor with rtl8139 http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1025 2) pcnet network of 32bit win2k/64bit hypervisor is not stable. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1026 Fixed issues (1)

We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 915/E8500 chipset. Here is the test summary: Issues: - Cannot boot Four VMX at same time on IA32 host - Cannot boot Windows XP SP1/SP2 on IA32e host - Create IA32-PAE VMX on IA32e host will make VMX kernel panic - Create IA32 VMX on IA32e host will make VMX hang - Destroying VMX with 4G memory may make xend hang on IA-32e IA-32: -

New issues (0) ================================================= No new issue. Old issues (3): ================================================= 1).time latency is a negative number on window guest when vcpu > 1 http://losvmm-bridge.sh.intel.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=991 You can reproduce it on SMP windows, it will not happen on UP Windows 2) IA32E/PAE: 32bit Vista RTM network

We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 915/E8500 chipset. Here is the test summary: Issues: - Cannot boot Windows 2000 - Only one CPU is detected in SMP dom0 - Destroying VMX with 4G memory may make xend hang on IA-32e IA-32: + Build&Boot UP xen0 without problem + Can bootup unmodified IA-32 2.4/2.6 linux in VMX domain + Can bootup unmodified IA-32 WindowsXP SP1/SP2 in

We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 915/E8500 chipset. Here is the test summary: Issues: - Only one CPU is detected in SMP dom0 - Destroying VMX with 4G memory may make xend hang on IA-32e IA-32: + Build&Boot UP xen0 without problem + Can bootup unmodified IA-32 2.4/2.6 linux in VMX domain + Can bootup unmodified IA-32 WindowsXP SP1/SP2 in VMX domain + Can bootup

We have tested latest xen on VT platform with Intel 915/E8500 chipset.Here is the test summary. issues: - No bocking issues. IA-32: Build&Boot SMP xen0 without problem Can bootup unmodified IA-32 2.4/2.6 linux in VMX domain Can bootup unmodified IA-32 WindowsXP SP1/SP2 in VMX domain Can bootup VMX & XenU with different memory size(VMX:128MB,256MB,512MB.XenU:256MB)