similar to: [Offtopic] tinydns -some help needed

Well, I have written that onboard network controller doesn't work... It's not true anymore. A small howto: 1) add pci network card 2) install with "linux all-generic-ide pci=nommconf" 3) update to the latest distro kernel 2.6.9-42.0.3 4) get http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/e1000/e1000-7.3.20.tar.gz 5) do have kernel-headers, rpmbuild ... etc. 6) rpmbuild -ta

Well, I have written that onboard network controller doesn't work... It's not true anymore. A small howto: 1) add pci network card 2) install with "linux all-generic-ide pci=nommconf" 3) update to the latest distro kernel 2.6.9-42.0.3 4) get http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/e1000/e1000-7.3.20.tar.gz 5) do have kernel-headers, rpmbuild ... etc. 6) rpmbuild -ta

Good morning: We're about to start moving our public DNS to in-house managed servers. My first thought was "Linux + BIND" and we're done. Someone in another business unit's IT dept. has suggested tinydns be used. >From what I could find, it looks like this software hasn't really had any community drive behind it in a while. The latest RPMs on rpmforge are for red hat

On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Greg Zartman <gzartman at koozali.org> wrote: > I'm workign to setup Samba4 and my current centos server deployment uses > TinyDNS/DNSCache for the DNS. Understanding that it is best to use Sambas > internal DNS for AD, I'm wondering how others are doing DNS? I really > don't want to use BIND. > > Should my DHCP server send

Hello listmates, Somehow or other my DNS services that are part of the ndjbdns-1.06-1.el7.x86_64 package would not start properly at startup. When I then start them up using systemctl: systemctl start dnscache systemctl start tinydns they start just fine. >From the log I got the following for tinydns: Oct 24 15:01:43 ns99 tinydns[1867]: tinydns: version 1.06: starting: Oct-24 2014 15:01:43

Hi all, tinydns starts up fine, selinux reports no issues (now after a day of clearing errors). If I turn selinux back to permissive in /etc/sysconfig/selinux, and reboot, tinydns responds to queries. If I turn selinux back to enforcing and reboot, tinydns does not respond. Monitoring /var/log/messages shows no errors from iptables/shorewall or selinux. The only way I can find an error is

Is there a tinydns or dns wizard that could give me some hints, please? I am setting up and testing tinydns, but have some problems figuring out how to route. I do get dnscache to listen on tinydns. Also I do not understand why it will not answer the given ip (127.0.0.1) to the name server. 1. Both services are up running and seems to be working fine, so why no reply, (on the first

I have used tinydns for many many years now and it has always worked very well. I like its simplicity: 1 text file is converted into a cdb database, there's no master/slave environment (all nameservers are equal) and synchronisation is done by rsync. Tinydns is run by runit, a supervise system. I'm looking at NSD now and I think I can use NSD the same way I use tinydns. The only

List: Sorry for posting to this list but could not find step by step instructions anywhere nor get any concerned list to respond. Newbie to DNS technicals but can work with instructions if given in ./configure for complete idiots ;-) 1. I have taken a static IP from my ISP 203.134.221.162 and the ISP has put up an entry in APNIC whois (please check the same)...to me it seems incomplete, as it

Hello all, I'm looking to setup a new CentOS box for a buddy of mine who wants to do hosting on a server via CoLo, Years ago I whipped up a CP of my own on a Debian box he colo'd running a basterdized qmail/tinydns and custom built httpd/mysql/etc (I was young). It worked ok but time to move on and I don't have time to maintain all those packages. I also don't have time to write

Hi, Maybe I am missing something simple, but I can't get users authenticated using password lookups, as opposed to auth_bind. This is how the log looks like when using password lookup: dovecot: auth(default): new auth connection: pid=2449 dovecot: auth(default): client in:

I just ran into this today with x86-64: Cannot yet select: 0x3cbc180: f64 = ConstantFP <1> As far as I can tell, DAGCombiner comes along and sees an sint_to_fp of the constant 1 and hapilly folds it into a ConstantFP<1>. ISel then blows up because there's no pattern for it. Does this look familiar to anyone? I don't see any relevant bugs in the database.

On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 17:02:09 +0100 richard lucassen via nsd-users <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> wrote: > The problem is (was) that I used "include:" statements in nsd.conf > to load zone information. Apparently nsd does not reread the include > files upon a SIGHUP. I scripted everything into 1 file and a HUP > rereads the zone info now. Wrong, I made a mistake it

On Sep 24, 2008, at 5:11 PM, David Greene wrote: > I just ran into this today with x86-64: > > Cannot yet select: 0x3cbc180: f64 = ConstantFP <1> > > As far as I can tell, DAGCombiner comes along and sees an sint_to_fp > of the > constant 1 and hapilly folds it into a ConstantFP<1>. ISel then > blows up > because there's no pattern for it. > >

Does anyone know of a card that actually works with CentOS 4 that supports Raid10? I don't think CentOS support software raid 10 from the installer. Thanks, -Drew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050812/ab215629/attachment-0002.html>

On Thursday 25 September 2008 19:12, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Sep 24, 2008, at 5:11 PM, David Greene wrote: > > I just ran into this today with x86-64: > > > > Cannot yet select: 0x3cbc180: f64 = ConstantFP <1> > > > > As far as I can tell, DAGCombiner comes along and sees an sint_to_fp > > of the > > constant 1 and hapilly folds it into a

Jan Stary <hans at stare.cz> wrote: > On Jan 01 00:05:09, jamie at catflap.org wrote: > > Jan Stary via nsd-users <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 31 11:43:56, paul at nohats.ca wrote: > > > > Why not go to xml and use xml2man / pandoc ? > > > > > > Because it is a terrible manpage format > > >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hey, I am trying to get spf working and it just doesn't want to take. On my Tiny/DJB server it was easy. Anyway here is my entry. $ORIGIN net. itadmins 14400 IN SOA ns1.itadmins.net. hostmaster.itadmins.net. ( 2012102201 16384 2048 1048576 2560 ) 14400 IN A 178.15.51.221 14400 IN

I was trying to figure out why my false-positive spam messages were being tagged as "personal" by thunderbird, and I noticed a possible problem. According to DJB: http://cr.yp.to/proto/maildir.html > New flags may be defined later. Flags must be stored in ASCII order: e.g., "2,FRS". Looking at my maildir, I am seeing flags out of order, such as "2,Sdae"

greetings, can someone(s) in authority please come up with a plan(s) of action in regards to this list medium? unfortunately this list has pretty much reached the point of no return and has become virtually useless. - rh -- Robert - Abba Communications Computers & Internet Sales/Service www.abbacomm.net