Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[Bug 1767] New: Inconsistend wildcard expansion in 'ls *'"
2008 Jul 21
2
sftp needs a long time for sending a filelist
Hello all
Im using sftp 1:4.7p1-8ubuntu1.2
in a batchjob
Ive noticed that sftp needs a long time for sending a filelist.
The timespan increases exponential if many files are on the
remoteserver.
for example "ls -la *.txt" needs 10 seconds for 2000 files
but needs 50 seconds for 4000 files.
For 150.000 Files i have to wait 15 minutes for example
but the
2011 Nov 11
3
[PATCH v2] Add mdadm-create, list-md-devices APIs.
This adds the mdadm-create API for creating RAID devices, and
includes various fixes for the other two patches.
Rich.
2002 Feb 06
2
SFTP Status Bar..
This is the LAST version I plan on doing.. If I hear no feed back good
or bad. Then I'll assume I've wasted my time on a feature that people
whine about but don't care to try. This is against 3.0.2pX so it
should be VERY easy for anyone to test.
- Ben
diff -ur openssh-3.0.2p1/misc.c openssh/misc.c
--- openssh-3.0.2p1/misc.c Tue Jul 3 23:46:58 2001
+++ openssh/misc.c Wed Feb 6
2002 Dec 05
2
[Bug 452] sftp does not abort when commands given via -b fail
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452
------- Additional Comments From spin at avalon.net 2002-12-06 03:15 -------
Forgot to mention that this is 3.1p1-6 RedHat RPM.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
2011 May 30
0
Syncing a write protected folder
Hi,
I've already asked in IRC, but i somehow can't belive this isn't
possible.
I have the folowing testcase (local, on an ext3 fs, no xattr):
.
??? [dr-xr-xr-x] dir1
??? ??? [-r--r--r--] text.txt
??? [drwxr-xr-x] target
and what i want after using 'rsync <some options> dir1 target' is:
.
??? [dr-xr-xr-x] dir1
??? ??? [-r--r--r--] text.txt
??? [drwxr-xr-x]
2004 Oct 04
1
[LLVMdev] cfrontend-1.3.source: Compilation error
This is a forward of a question from the SourceForge LLVM forum. If
anyone has experience with Cygwin and building the C front-end there,
please reply and CC Alex.
--- Post by Alex Vinokur below ---
===============
Windows 2000
GNU gcc 3.3.3 (cygwin special)
===============
./configure
./make
I have got compilation error
-------------------------------
make[1]: Entering directory
2007 Dec 28
1
Odd behavior with --detect-renamed
Hello,
I'm totally new to this list, so I hope I don't break all the rules. :)
I've looked through the archives (and google), and I really can't find the
answer to my question.
I'm trying out the 'detect-renamed'-patch, and I've encountered some odd
behavior. I've applied the patch to both rsync-2.6.9 and rsync-3.0.0pre7,
and it's the same behavior.
2007 Nov 19
1
rsync-ing from two locations with same filenames (at different versions)
Hello,
I would like to have a full repository, say, holding files
full/a.txt (version 1)
full/b.txt (version 1)
full/c.txt (version 1)
and a repository of updates, for example
new/b.txt (version 2 - newer)
Then, I would like to call
rsync [flags] new/ full/ destination
to get
destination/a.txt (v.1)
destination/b.txt (v.2)
destination/c.txt (v.1)
This simple case works
2002 Sep 17
0
Bug Report rsync 2.5.5 --delete and soft links to parent directories causes MAXSYMLINKS error
I have found an unwanted feature of rsync 2.5.5. It has to do with
soft links and the --delete option in archive mode. The following shows
how to reproduce the error.
Provide a soft link that refers to a parent directory.
%> /bin/ls -lR /tmp/src
/tmp/src:
total 16
16 drwxrwxr-x 2 wke sys_admin 239 Sep 17 16:18 dir1/
/tmp/src/dir1:
total 32
16 lrwxrwxrwx 1 wke
2005 Mar 03
1
Why does "rsync -av" always claim (incorrectly?) that it is updating write protected directories?
Hi,
I usually run "rsync -av" so I can see all the files that have
been modified.
However, "rsync -av" always claims to be updating write
protected directories, even when they have not been changed. I do not
understand why.
Here is an example using rsync version 2.6.3 on FreeBSD 5.3.
I get similar results with rsync 2.6.0 on Gentoo Linux.
--------
$ mkdir dir0
$ touch
2000 Apr 03
1
2.0.7pre3: smbclient issues
My systems: rh61, 2.2.14 + smbfs-nls.patch.
I refer to 2.0.7pre3 as 2.0.7
=== 1) "ls" of an empty dir
1a)
1.9.18 doing "ls" to an empty samba dir:
smb: \> ls
49550 blocks of size 16384. 33754 blocks available
1b)
2.0.7 doing "ls" to an empty samba dir:
smb: \> ls
ERRDOS - ERRbadfile (File not found.) listing \* <=======
2008 Sep 09
3
directories not correctly recognized rsync-3.0.4
Hi,
I'm running rsync-3.0.4 on my UNIX system. I've just updated from rsync-2.6.9.
I'm facing a general problem with the execution of files during a transfer process.
The situation: 2 Directories (dir1 and dir2) on one machine with a some files in dir1 which shall be translated to dir2.
rsync does not correctly recognize dir1 and dir2 as directories. It tries to transfer dir1 as a
2004 Mar 25
1
Per-directory .cvsignore too aggressive
I have noticed that the contents of per-directory .cvsignore files apply
outside their subtrees when using --cvs-exclude in rsync 2.6.0. In the
results below, notice how dir1/.cvsignore is applying to a file in dir2.
There is no ~/.cvsignore, and the CVSIGNORE variable is unset.
% ls -AFR
.:
dir1/ dir2/
./dir1:
.cvsignore file1
./dir2:
file2.foo
% cat dir1/.cvsignore
*.foo
% /usr/bin/rsync
2003 Feb 25
2
Difference in behaviour with --backup
When I do
rsync -av --backup --backup-dir=/dir1/dir2/Backup \
/dir1/dir2/dir3 machine:/dir1/dir2/dir3
I get /dir1/dir2/Backup/dir3/...
/Backup/dir3/dir4/...
i.e. the tree under 'dir3' (my source tree) gets created
under .../Backup. This is fine.
But when I do the same thing with a single file like
rsync -av --backup --backup-dir=/dir1/dir2/Backup \
/dir1/dir2/file
2005 Mar 31
1
exclude_dir option for VFS recycle module
Hello all,
I am testing the VFS recycle module, and have a question.
The module is working the way I hoped with the exception of the
exclude_dir option. I have an entry like:
exclude_dir = dir1 -- files I place in dir1 are not sent to the recycle
location. However, if I have a folder beneath dir1 like dir1/dir2, files
in dir2 get sent to the recycle location. I've tried using wildcards in
2004 Mar 22
2
orphan dirs and files with --delete
rsync (2.5.[67]) --delete fails on dirs with the w bit cleared. (example below)
Rsync will sync a dir with w bit clear, but will not remove it with --delete.
This is not a big problem, but it will create situations where there are
'orphaned' files.
Has anyone else had this problem?
It looks like a change would be needed in robust_unlink (util.c). This function
would have to do a chmod
2002 Feb 14
1
HP/UX 11 bug
glob(3) on HP/UX 11 always strips a trailing slash from a pathname. This
breaks the differing semantics of
rsync directory host:/foo/bar
rsync directory host:/foo/bar/
Here's a patch which, at least, doesn't seem to do any harm on Solaris
or Linux and fixes the problem on HP.
Cheers,
Mark
--- util.c.OLD Tue Jan 29 15:25:08 2002
+++ util.c Tue Jan 29 15:30:03 2002
@@ -542,6 +542,7 @@
2002 Oct 18
1
Patch: sftp client support of "ls [flags] [path [localfile]]" feature
Hello,
I just downloaded OpenSSH 3.5p1. This version has some great improvement in
sftp client.
But I still miss the FTP's "ls [flags] remote-path [localpath]" feature to
redirect the output of ls/dir
to a local file.
The following are the diff outputs against 3.5p1 to enable this feature.
*** sftp-int.c.orig Wed Sep 11 20:34:15 2002
--- sftp-int.c Fri Oct 18 13:39:46 2002
2007 Dec 09
3
OT: Rsync question
Hello All,
I have an off topic question about rsync and was
wondering if i can get some kind person help with it.
I have two servers with each server have three same
directories on them /dir1/ /dir2/ /dir3/ . How would i
achieve this by using rsync?
I have tried rsync -avrt --delete server_ip:/dir1/
/dir2/ /dir3/ /dir1/ /dir2/ /dir3/
this does not do anything except give errors.
Someone on IRC
2006 Jun 11
0
Application construction issue (conceptual)
I was wondering if someone can give me some assistance in approaching this
issue:
First, the background: I have an app that i originally did in PHP that I''m
redoing in Rails. It can be used by multiple clients that have no relation
to each other. The client information is in a database and is determined by
the hostname. Clients then have several users related by client_id. The