similar to: Upgrading to CentOS 4.2 from FC2?

Greetings, I *do* still have an FC2 box. Would anyone second this procedure: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=14052&forum=37&post_id=47945 Thanks. Max Pyziur pyz at brama.com

This was my experience with upgrading, your mileage may vary especially if it's in kilometers. This is what I had to do to get my system running again. ############## In order to attempt this upgrade, I had to use "linux upgradeany", a mode not listed for the installer CDs. My first problem was I could no longer boot the system after the upgrade. My grub menu showed my old

Well, after hearing nothing, and being irritated enough with this problem, I did some exhaustive googling and turned up with this: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2004-June/msg00769.html Apparently there are now 2 security policy changes you must make on a 2003 dc instead of just the one like before. Once I had our Win Admin make the change, I was able to smbmount everything again.

Hello all, hopefully someone has run into this before. I was previously running RH9 with Samba 3.0.2a and would normally mount a document folder to a Win2003 server share. Prior to the upgrade, my mount would work fine, but after upgrading to FC2 (Samba 3.0.5) I now receive "Permission denied" when trying to access the succesfully mounted share. In addition, when I try to 'ls

Hi, I have a client that insists on going with software rather than hardware raid1 to save a few dollars. Can Centos 4.2 do Boot and Root on software Raid1? I've heard criticisms of Grub and bootable RAID. Also, if it is not set up to work out of the box, I'd like to try to talk them out of it. I've been down that road before. If I go nonstandard, by the time I actually need

I'm a newbie to dovecot and a little bit less of a newbit to linux. I am in the process of moving my server from RH9 to FC2. The only obstacle remaining is my email. I run sendmail with netscape mail clients - mostly PC's. They all can read their mail but none of the users can send. Depending on the state of the dovecot.conf file, I get the following: Mar 28 16:04:14 corvette

OK, let me try this again. . . . I'm a newbie to dovecot and a little bit less of a newbie to linux. I am in the process of moving my server from RH9 to FC2. The only obstacle remaining is my email. I run dovecot (v0.99.14) POP3 and sendmail (8.12.11-4.6) with Mozilla (1.4.2 and others), Thunderbird (1.0.2) and Netscape (7.1 on PC's, etc) mail clients - mostly PC's (W2K, WXP).

Hello list. I've just read this news (http://distrowatch.com/?newsid=02638) - in my opinion very good idea. What do you think? Regards.

I recently built a CentOS 6 system as my main machine at home. With a bit of help from members of this list, it is now working better than the machine it replaced (RIP). The new machine works so well, that I would like to convert some CentOS 5 machines to CentOS6. I did some research on the web and the new install is still considered the proper way to upgrade CentOS. Same as Fedora and RHEL. The

Ok, no one has said it yet so I will. http://37signals.com/svn/archives2/bezos_expeditions_invests_in_37signals.php?102#comments How is this going to affect Rails? Or is it? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Cutting straight to the chase: When, if ever, does the installer offer an option to upgrade an existing installation, rather than wanting to reformat the disks? More details than you may want: I recently acquired a new PC chassis, with no operating system but with a Serial-ATA disk (which I was not expecting when I ordered it). I set the BIOS for legacy IDE mode and installed RedHat 9, then

greetings - I'm trying to upgrade a centos 3.6 box to version 4. I tried to do an upgrade using yum but that failed and now the Cd installer is not letting me upgrade either. Here's what I did: following the howto, I tried to do the upgrade using yum. I installed the GPG key and upgraded the centos-release and the centos-yumconf packages. When I tried to upgrade yum package I ran

Hi, Does anyone know how to correctly configure RadRails (0.7)? I can''t seem to get 0.7 version of radrails to create a Rails project. All I get is a blank project. I have ensured that my PATH does point to my ruby\bin area. Also any clarification regarding which directory (with an example) should be used for the following preferences setting (are they asking for a file or

Greetings, A friend of mine is running 3.3 He asked what I thought about going to 4.4 I imagine it is best to backup and fresh install and migrate old configs and data What is the wisdom on the list I remember going from beta 3 to 3 a long time ago. Anyone ever upgrade from 3.x to 4.x without problem and how so? I didn't see a lot on the www other than some apt-get info Thanks in

Hi, I use CentOS4 (RHEL4) and it seems that I was using /var/lib/samba for storing the .tdb files. Then I compilled the fedora .src.rpm from samba.org and it points now to /var/cache/samba I will build tonight the .rpm from the .tar.gz and see which directory samba choose for the .tdb files in CentOS4. Anyone can confirm this list of distro/.tdb directory: Fedora: /var/cache/samba CentOS4:

Can I upgrade my Centos 4.1 system with the 4.2 ISO install disc? If so, how do I do it? It seams to want to do a full (i.e. format, wipe out old) install over everything. I do not want to lose my various configurations (e.g. kppp, kde desktop settings, etc) that I have already set up under 4.1. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I have FC 3 running on my "play/test" box. Is CentOS (RHEL) a level above? Can I do an Upgrade or should I do an Install? Todd -- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050730/05888be3/attachment-0001.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was

I try to run lli with "--load=/lib/libpthread.so", but it shows: --------------------------------------------------- [yue at RH9 test]$ ./pthread.ll Error opening '/lib/libpthread.so.0': /lib/libpthread.so.0: symbol _errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference -load request ignored. Creating thread 0 WARNING: Cannot resolve fn

hi, I compile a pthread program using llvmgcc, but when i run pthread.ll, it show: ------------------ [yue at RH9 test]$ llvmgcc pthread.c -o pthread.ll [yue at RH9 test]$ ls pthread pthread.c pthread.ll pthread.ll.bc [yue at RH9 test]$ ./pthread.ll Creating thread 0 WARNING: Cannot resolve fn 'pthread_create' using a dummy noop function instead! ERROR; return code from

On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, yue wrote: > I try to run lli with "--load=/lib/libpthread.so", but it shows: > --------------------------------------------------- > [yue at RH9 test]$ ./pthread.ll > Error opening '/lib/libpthread.so.0': /lib/libpthread.so.0: symbol > _errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time > reference > -load request